Family-Friendly Support Programs and Work- Family Enrichment among Working Women: The Mediating Role of Organizational Perceptions

Authors

  • Noraini Binti Mohamad , Hipiny Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 93400Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/3v8hzh04

Keywords:

Family-Supportive Organizational Perceptions,, Work-to-Family Enrichment, Family-Friendly Support programs,, Working Women.

Abstract

The study aims to examine the mediating role of family-supportive organizational perceptions (FSOP) between family-friendly support programs (FFP) (flexible work arrangements (FWA), specialized leave options, childcare facilities, financial supports, information and support and others) and work-to-family enrichment (WFE) (developmental-based, affective-based and capital-based) among working women. A quantitative methodology was adopted in this study in which data were gathered through survey questionnaires administered to 163 women employees working in two selected public institutions of higher learning in Sarawak, Malaysia. The hypotheses of the study were analysed using Pearson’s correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and Sobel test. The results revealed that FSOP mediates the effect of the awareness on the availability of FWA and childcare facilities on WFE (affective based), which highlights the important role played by FSOP in determining the outcome of FFP. Hence, the adoption of work-life balance approach has to take into consideration the context in which it operates in as there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach that can meet the real needs of various cultures.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. U.S Bureau of Labor Statistics. Women in the labour force: A datebook. Report No.: 1049. [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2013.pdf

2. Subramaniam AG, Overton BJ, Maniam CB. Flexible working arrangements, work life balance and women in Malaysia. Int J Soc Sci Humanit [Internet]. 2015;5(1):34–8. Available from: http://www.ijssh.org/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=51&id=733

3. TalentCorp. New website launced to promote greater awareness of gender diversity and inclusion in the workforce. TalentCorp [Press Release]. 2013; Available from: https://www.talentcorp.com.my/resources/press-releases/new-website-launched-to-promote-greater- awareness-of-gender-diversity-and-inclusion-in-the-workforce

4. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Labour force survey report, Malaysia, 2015 [Press Release]. 2015. Available from:

https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/pdfPrev&id=TFVqZ2NtWW9iNlJBV0pTQnZUUzBEZz

09

5. Noor NM, Mohd Mahudin ND. Work-life balance policies in Malaysia: Theory and practice. In: Luo L, Cooper CL, editors. Handbook of research on work-life balance. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edwards Elgar Publishing; 2015. p. 207–235.

6. National institute of opulation and family development of Malaysia. The 5th Malaysian population and family survery (KPKM-5) [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://online.fliphtml5.com/zabi/iwsm/#p=51

7. Economic Planning Unit of Malaysia. Eleventh Malaysia plan 2016 – 2020: Anchoring growth on people [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://rmk11.epu.gov.my/book/eng/Elevent-Malaysia-Plan/RMKe-11 Book.pdf

8. Mohamad M bin. Malaysia: The way forward (Vision 2020). Percetakan Nasional Malaysia; 1991. 30 p.

9. Wong A. Malaysian not ready for the new world of work (NWOW). TECHARP [Internet]. 2016 Jan 26; Available from: https://www.techarp.com/news/malaysians-not-ready-for-new-world-of-work-nwow/

10. Fredriksen-Goldswen KI, Scharlach AE. Impact of gender, race/ethnicity, and occupational role. In: Fredriksen-Goldswen KI, Scharlach AE, editors. Families and work: New directions in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 146–166.

11. Swift J. Politics, motherhood, and madame president. In: Marcus-Newhall DF, Halpern AJ, editors. The changing realities of work and family: A multidisciplinary approach. London, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008. p. 221–231.

12. chaner S, Das S. Female labor force participation in Asia: Indonesia country study (Asian Development Bank economics working paper series No. 474) [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/180251/ewp-474.pdf

13. Allen TD. Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. J Vocat Behav [Internet]. 2001 Jun;58(3):414–35. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001879100917743

14. Butts MM, Casper WJ, Yang TS. How important are work–family support policies? A meta-analytic investigation of their effects on employee outcomes. J Appl Psychol [Internet]. 2013;98(1):1–25. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0030389

15. Sutton KL, Noe RA. Family-friendly programs and work-life intergration: More myth than magic? In: Kossek EE, Lambert SJ, editors. Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2005. p. 151 – 169.

16. Cegarra‐Leiva D, Sánchez‐Vidal ME, Gabriel Cegarra‐Navarro J. Understanding the link between work life balance practices and organisational outcomes in SMEs. Pers Rev [Internet]. 2012 Apr 6;41(3):359–79. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00483481211212986/full/html

17. Siu O, Lu J, Brough P, Lu C, Bakker AB, Kalliath T, et al. Role resources and work–family enrichment: The role of work engagement. J Vocat Behav [Internet]. 2010 Dec;77(3):470–80. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001879110001193

18. Coakes SJ, Steed L. SPSS version 14.0 for Windows: Analysis without anguish. Queensland, Australia: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.

19. Fraenkel J, Wallen N. How to design and evaluate research in education. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill; 1993.

20. Carlson DS, Kacmar KM, Wayne JH, Grzywacz JG. Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface:

Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. J Vocat Behav [Internet]. 2006 Feb;68(1):131–64. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001879105000448

21. Kacmar KM, Crawford WS, Carlson DS, Ferguson M, Whitten D. A short and valid measure of work-family enrichment. J Occup Health Psychol [Internet]. 2014;19(1):32–45. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0035123

22. Ahmad A. Association of work-family conflict, job satisfaction, family satisfaction and life satisfaction: A study of married female secretaries. Pertanika J Soc Sci Humanit. 1996;4(2):101–8.

23. Soper DS. Sobel test calculator for the significance of mediation [Internet]. Free Statistics Calculator. 2016. Available from: https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=31

24. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol [Internet]. 1986;51(6):1173–82. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

25. Schaufeli WB, Taris TW. A critical review of the job demands-resources model: Implications for improving work and health. In: Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. p. 43–68. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3_4

26. Baral R, Bhargava S. Work‐family enrichment as a mediator between organizational interventions for work‐ life balance and job outcomes. J Manag Psychol [Internet]. 2010 Mar 30;25(3):274–300. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683941011023749/full/html

27. Greenhaus JH, Powell GN. When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Acad Manag Rev [Internet]. 2006 Jan;31(1):72–92. Available from: http://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.2006.19379625

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Hipiny, N. B. M. ,. (2020). Family-Friendly Support Programs and Work- Family Enrichment among Working Women: The Mediating Role of Organizational Perceptions. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 3798-3812. https://doi.org/10.61841/3v8hzh04