Effective Teaching Methods in Modern Times
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ynetev63Keywords:
(Student-centered;, Teacher-centered;, Learning method)Abstract
Effective teaching methods have been the corner stone for the education system. In this research we tried to identify which method is more effective and desirable from the point of view of teachers, students and parents. It aims to enhance teachers’ and students’ ability to know how the educational process could continue effectively. Apart from other researches which focus on only teacher-centered approach or student- centered approach of learning. This research aims to encompass four major teaching approaches, which are high or low technology system in classroom environment on one hand, and student or teacher oriented approach in classroom on the other hand, to determine the most effective teaching method in current times. The research was conducted through a questionnaire to collect data that shows preferences of teachers, students and parents. The research concluded that the most recommended method is the low-tech student centered approach.
Downloads
References
1. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1-18).
2. Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (1994). Methods for effective teaching (Vol. 160). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Coombe, C. (2018). Debates and Discussions. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-8.
4. EDUCAUSE Learning initiative (2012). 7 Things you should know About Flipped Classrooms.
5. Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.
6. García, D. A. L., Sanguino, T. D. J. M., Ancos, E. C., & de Viana Gonzalez, I. F. (2016, July). A Debate and Decision-Making Tool for Enhanced Learning. In TLT (Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 205-216).
7. Garrett, M., Schoener, L., & Hood, L. (1996). Debate: A teaching strategy to improve verbal communication and critical-thinking skills. Nurse educator, 21(4), 37-40.
8. Jhangiani, R. S. (2016). The impact of participating in a peer assessment activity on subsequent academic performance. Teaching of Psychology, 43(3), 180-186.
9. Kennedy, R. (2007). In-class debates: Fertile ground for active learning and the cultivation of critical thinking and oral communication skills. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 19(2).
10. McCarthy, J. P., & Anderson, L. (2000). Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: Two experiments from history and political science. Innovative higher education, 24(4), 279-294.
11. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44- 49.
12. Steven P., Vargo (2012). Teaching by debate. For the Master Teacher Program, a 2-year faculty professional development program conducted by The Center for Faculty Excellence, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, pp. 1-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
