Assessment of Industrial Internship’s Instruments for Students of Machine Engineering Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/c4ae8z31Keywords:
Instruments, Industrial, Practice, Mechanical, EngineeringAbstract
very student who is majoring in Mechanical Engineering Education (MEE) at the Faculty of Engineering, Manado State University has to study both theoretical and practical aspects. In the curriculum, students are required to follow the practice of the course must also follow practical activities in the industry. Practical activities need to know the competencies obtained by students while practicing in the industry. The research objective is to design instruments to measure student practical activities in the industry. In this study using the research and development (R&D) method of the Borg & Gall model. The findings obtained in this study are:
(1) the developed instrument products meet the validity requirements, (2) the instrument developed is very practical and effectively used to measure the practical activities of students majoring in MEE in the industry.
Downloads
References
Dkatadata. (2010). Pengangguran Indonesia tertinggi ke 3 di Asia Tenggara. Available at: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/.
2. BPS. (2018). Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka. Available at: https://www.bps.go.id/press/.
3. Hasanah, Syahrul, & Merdekawati E. (2016). Efektivitas pelaksanaan program praktek kerja industry di sekolah menengah kejuruan. J Mekom 3(2):158–166.
4. Bloom BS, Engelhart MD, Furst EJ, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objetives: the classification of educational goals: handbook I: cognitive domain (D. Mckay, New York,USA).
5. Anderson, L. W., & Anderson JC. (1982). Affective Assessment Is Necessary and Possible. Educ Leadersh 39:524–526.
6. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwolh DR. (1981). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives (Longman, New York).
7. Susana N. (2015). Pengelolaan praktek kerja industri. Manajer Pendidik 10(6):579–587.
8. Stevani. (2015). Pengaruh praktek kerja industri (prakerin) dan keterampilan siswa terhadap kesiapan memasuki dunia kerja siswa Administrasi Perkantoran SMK N 3 Padang. J Econ Educ 3(2):185–195.
9. Wena M. (1996). Pendidikan Sistem Ganda (Tarsito, Bandung).
10. Sulistyowati R. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran kewirausahaan dan praktik kerja industry (prakerin) terhadap sikap kewirausahaan siswa SMK Negeri di Surabaya. J Ekon Pendidik dan Kewirausahaan 2(1):85–101.
11. Djojonegoro W. (1998). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Melalui SMK. Jakarta: Jayakarta Agung Offset (Jayakarta Agung Offset, Jakarta).
12. Anwar. (2004). Pendidikan Kecakapan Hidup Konsep dan Aplikasi (Alfabeta, Bandung).
13. Sanjaya W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standart Proses Pendidikan (Kencana Prenada Media, Jakarta).
14. Faizal, A. N., Burhanuddin & S. (2018). Manajemen praktik kerja industri. J Adm dan Manaj Pendidik 1(2):139–149.
15. Arsyad A. (2000). Media Pengajaran (PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta).
16. Kartikawati, S., & Robianto RF. (2016). Pengaruh pelaksanaan praktek industri terhadap motivasi belajar siswa kelas XI IL SMK N 1 Wonosari. J Pendidik Tek Elektro 1(1):26–34.
17. Siregar, R. F., & Tambunan BH. (2017). Hubungan pengalaman praktik kerja laangan industry dengan kesiapan kerja siswa sesuai standar kompetensi kerja nasional Indonesia kelas XII paket keahlian Teknik kendaraan ringan SMK Negeri 2 Medan T.A 2016/2017. J Teknol dan Kejuru 29(1):32–38.
18. Chalpin P. (2006). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi (Terjemahan Kartini Kartono) (PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta).
19. Mawaddah S, Maryanti R. (2016). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Pembelajaran Menggunakan Model Penemuan Terbimbing (Discovery Learning). J Pendidik Mat 4(1):76– 85.
20. Susena. (2005). Pengembangan Kualifikasi Dosen Program Diploma Berbasis Kompetensi. Peningkatan
Karier Dosen Di Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan Program Diploma (Bandung).
21. Hamalik O. (2007). Manajemen Pelatihan Ketanagakerjaan Pendekatan Terpadu. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara (PT Bumi Aksara, Jakarta).
22. Ajayi VO. (2018). Difference between Assessment, Measurement, and Evaluation in Science Education (Benue State University, Nigeria, Makurdi).
23. Ponto H. (2016). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kejuruan (Deepublish, Yogyakarta).
24. Arifin Z. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Rosdakarya, Bandung).
25. Sudijono A. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada. (Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta).
26. Saputra, L. S., Salikun, & Nugroho W. (2014). Buku Pegangan Guru PKN Kelas VIII SMP/MTS: Bu ku Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Jakarta).
27. Ponto H, Tasiam FJ, Wonggo D. (2018). Designing affective domain evaluation instrument for basics Electrical Subject in Vocational High School. Int J Eng Technol 7(25):395–398.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
