EVALUATION OF HISTORY LEARNING PROGRAM IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL : CASE STUDY AT SMAN 10 BOGOR CITY, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/em914c17Keywords:
-Learning history,, Curriculum 2013,, CIPP ModelAbstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the extent of the quality of history learning in high school. This study uses an Evaluation study using the CIPP Stufflebeam Model. This research was conducted at SMAN 10 Bogor City with data collection techniques using interview, observation, questionnaire and document analysis guidelines which were analyzed using triangulation. the results of this study indicate that history learning for the time being has not been very effective, due to several problems namely: evaluating the context in the implementation of the 2013 curriculum for history learning in secondary schools has not been well socialized to stakeholders, especially teachers as curriculum implementers in the field. in addition, based on input evaluation, it shows that teacher competence strongly supports the success of history learning, process evaluation shows that learning still uses knowledge transfer considering key facts and textbook thinking, while product evaluation looks at the use of the 2013 curriculum which divides history learning into historical subjects Indonesia and historical subjects do not provide maximum benefit, so repetition often occurs on some material. This concludes that in reality students who study history subjects lack understanding history as a continuation to 'real life'. Therefore, it is very much needed handling by making the problem as part of recommendations in an effort to improve teacher competency and professionalism, by optimizing the functions of supervisors and principals as guarantors of the quality of learning in the classroom, especially on historical subjects.
Downloads
References
1. Aman, A. (2013). PENGEMBANGAN MODEL EVALUASI PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN
SEJARAH DI SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i2.1126
2. Anurrahman. (2010). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
3. Anwar, R. (2017). Hal-Hal yang Mendasari Penerapan Kurikulum 2013. Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v5i1.2987
4. Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2012). An introduction to context and its role in evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20024
5. Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (2005). Principle of Instructional Design. Performance Improvement. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140440211
6. Husbands, C. (2011). Facilitating effective student learning through teacher research and innovation. Teacher Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2011.608523
7. Lincon, Y., & Guba, E. (1994). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. In Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
8. Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib.
9. Ministry of Education. (2012). A Policy Framework for Education. Aligning Education and Training to the Constitution of Kenya (2010) and Kenya Vision 2030 and Beyond.
10. Mulyasa, E. (2007). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, Suatu Panduan Praktis. In Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, Suatu Panduan Praktis. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosada Karya.
11. Nuriyah, N. (2014). Evaluasi pembelajaran: Sebuah Kajian Teori. Jurnal Edueksos. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2013-0411OC
12. Scriven, M. (2007). KEY EVALUATION CHECKLIST. Evaluation.
13. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). The CIPP Evaluation Model. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6869-7
14. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
15. Sukardi. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Kepelatihan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
16. Umasih, U. (2012). EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN SEJARAH PADA SMA NEGERI DI DKI
JAKARTA. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v22i2.2122
17. Wirawan. (2012). Evaluasi Teori Model, Standard, Aplikasi dan Prosesi (Contoh Aplikasi Evaluasi Program: Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM), Mandiri Pedesaan, Kurikulum, Perpustakaan, dan Buku Teks. Jakarta: RadjaGrafindo Persada.
18. Zed, M. (2018). Tentang Konsep Berfikir Sejarah. Lensa Budaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Budaya. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.34050/jlb.v13i1.4147
19. arthur, j. (n.d.).
20. james arthur, r. p. (2002). issues in history teaching. london: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
