Voluntary Tax Compliance: Impact of Justice And Trust In Government Authorities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/96p69948Keywords:
General Justice, exchange with goverment,, - General Justice Self Interest, , Special provisions, tax rate,, Voluntary Tax Compliance,, TrustAbstract
--This study aims to analyze the influence of the tax dimension (general justice, exchange with the government, self-interests, special provisions, tax rate structure) by using trust in government authorities as a mediating variable. The population in this study is the Individual Taxpayer in Riau Province. Sampling technique used is purposive sampling. A total of 300 questionnaires were distributed to Individual Taxpayers in the cities of Pekanbaru, Bengkalis and Bangkinang, as many as 283 data can be processed. The results of the analysis with PLS show the exchange with the government and, self-interests and the tax rate have an important effect on voluntary compliance while general justice, special povicions do not directly influence voluntary compliance. General justice that have a significant effect on trust in the government, while other variables have no effect. The results of the analysis show that trust only mediates the influence of general justice on voluntary compliance.
Downloads
References
1. Allingham, M.G., Dan A. Sandmo. 1972. Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal Of Public Economics 1 (3): 323–338.
2. Alm, J. 1991. A Perspective On The Experimental Analysis Of Taxpayer Reporting. The Accounting Review 66 (July): 577–593.
3. Azmi, A A Che dan Kamala A. Perumal. 2008. Tax Fairness Dimensions in an Asian Context: The Malaysian Perspective. International Review of Business Research and Paper, Vol 4: 11-19.
4. Basri, Y.M 2015 Kepercayaan Dan Kekuasaan Dalam Otoritas Pemerintah Sebagai Determinan Tingkat Kepatuhan Pajak Dan Penggelapan Pajak : Pengujian Assumsi Kerangka Slippery Slope. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 15 Banjarmasin
5. Benk S, Cakmank AF dan Budak T . 2011.An Investigation of Tax Compliance intention : A Theory of Planned Behavior Approach, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences : ISSN 1450-2275 Issue 28 180-188
6. Cahyonowati, N., dan D. Ratmono. 2013 Kepercayaan Terhadap Otoritas Pajak Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Deterrence Factors Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Pribadi , Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. 2 No. 1.
7. Iskandar, Hendar, Opini Pajak “ Membangun Kepatuhan Sukarela Pajak Dan Fenomena Mengemis Kasih” ( Www. Hendariskandar.Com Diposting 2016)
8. Kirchler, E., E. Hoelzl, dan I. Wahl. 2008. Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The ‘slippery Slope’ framework. Journal of Economic Psychology 29 (2): 210–225.
9. Kogler, C., L. Batrancea, dan A. Nichita. 2013. Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology 34 (1): 169–180.
10. Konovsky, M. A., dan R. Cropanzano. 1991. Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal
11. Korsgaard, M. A., D. M. Schweiger, dan H. J. Sapienza. 1995. Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal 38 (1): 60–84.
12. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, dan R. Willis, 27–55. New York: Plenum.
13. Lind, E. A. 2001. Fairness heuristic theory: justice judgements as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In Advances in Organizational Justice, edited by J. Greenberg dan R. Cropanzano. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
14. Lind, E. A., L. Kray, dan L. Thompson. 2001. primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85: 189– 210.
15. Magner, N. R., G. G. Johnson, J. S. Sobery, dan R. B. Welker. 2000. Enhancing procedural justice in local government budget and tax decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30: 789–815.
16. Verboon, P, dan M. van Dijke. 2011. When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The Role of procedural fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (1): 120–130.
17. Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance. An empirical analysis of the ‘‘Slippery Slope Framework’’. Law & Policy, 32, 383–406.
18. Wenzel, M. 2004. The Social side of sanctions: Personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law and Human Behavior 28 (5): 547–567. Worsham, R.
19. www. merdeka.com Kemenkeu risau Tax Ratio RI terus menurun, di download 2017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
