THE EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF BLENDED LEARNING AT SPORT SCHOOLS IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/2p759x77Keywords:
-Effectiveness and Efficiency, Blended Learning, ; Sport SchoolsAbstract
Students in sport schools find it difficult to attend face-to-face learning in class with their teacher. It is because students in sport schools are athletes who often leave the classroom to do training camps or to take part in competitions outside the city for a long time. Blended-learning-based learning can be a solution because this learning can be done anywhere and anytime. The purpose of this study was to look at the effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning-based learning in sport schools. The research method used was an experiment with The One Group Pre-test Post-test design. The data showed that after the blended-learning-based learning, the students’ learning outcomes increased and the students were able to understand the material in relatively short time. Thus, blended-learning-based learning was effective and efficient to be used in sport schools.
Downloads
References
1. Academy of Management. (2008). Academy of Management Perspectives.
2. Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A Review of Leadership Theories, Principles and Styles and Their Relevance to Educational Management. Management.
3. Blei, D. M. D., Edu, B. B., Ng, A. Y., Edu, A. S., Jordan, M. I., Edu, J. B., Newman, D., et al. (2014).
Online learning for latent dirichlet allocation. Naacl.
4. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal.
5. Broglio, S. P., Eckner, J. T., & Kutcher, J. S. (2012). Field-based measures of head impacts in high school football athletes. Current Opinion in Pediatrics.
6. Bullock, A., & De Jong, P. G. (2013). Technology-enhanced learning. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice: Second Edition.
7. Caldwell, B. J. (2015). School Management. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition.
8. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence- Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Structure.
9. Duchi, J., Hazan, E., & Singer, Y. (2011). Adaptive Subgradient Methods for Online Learning and Stochastic Optimization. JMLR.
10. Everard, K. B., Morris, G., & Wilson, I. (2004). Effective school management. Effective School Management.
11. Ghofar, A., & Islam, S. M. N. (2015). Research method. Contributions to Management Science.
12. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet and Higher Education.
13. Hendrianto, D. E. (2014). Pembuatan Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan Berbasis Website Pada Sekolah Menegah Pertama Negeri 1 Donorojo Kabupaten Pacitan. IJNS-Indonesian Journal on Networking and Security ISSN: 2302-5700 (Print) 2354-6654 (Online.
14. Idaho Digital Learning. (2014). 6 Models of Blended Learning. 6 Models of Blended Learning.
15. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education.
16. Kaylani, H. A. (2015). The female athlete. Nuclear Medicine and Radiologic Imaging in Sports Injuries.
17. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management.
18. Marar, M., McIlvain, N. M., Fields, S. K., & Comstock, R. D. (2012). Epidemiology of concussions among united states high school athletes in 20 sports. American Journal of Sports Medicine.
19. McGrath, N. (2010). Supporting the student-athlete’s return to the classroom after a sport-related concussion. Journal of Athletic Training.
20. Meehan, W. P., D’Hemecourt, P., Collins, C. L., & Comstock, R. D. (2011). Assessment and management of sport-related concussions in United States high schools. American Journal of Sports Medicine.
21. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education.
22. Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet and Higher Education.
23. Perry, E. H., & Pilati, M. L. (2011). Online learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning.
24. Piebes, S. K., Gourley, M., & McLeod, T. C. V. (2009). Caring for student-athletes following a concussion. Journal of School Nursing.
25. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review.
26. Register-Mihalik, J. K., Guskiewicz, K. M., McLeod, T. C. V., Linnan, L. A., Mueller, F. O., & Marshall,
S. W. (2013). Knowledge, attitude, and concussion-reporting behaviors among high school athletes: A preliminary study. Journal of Athletic Training.
27. Rosenthal, J. A., Foraker, R. E., Collins, C. L., & Comstock, R. D. (2014). National high school athlete concussion rates from 2005-2006 to 2011-2012. American Journal of Sports Medicine.
28. Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.
29. Schell, C., & Yin, R. K. (2006). Case study as a research method. ERS-RUPRI conference: Exploring Rural Entrepreneurship.
30. Sharples, M., & Pea, R. (2014). Mobile learning. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, Second Edition.
31. Stacey, E., & Gerbic, P. (2008). Success factors for blended learning. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2008.
32. Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K – 12 blended learning. Innosight Institude Report.
33. Story, D. A., & Tait, A. R. (2019). Survey Research. Anesthesiology.
34. Sugimoto, D., Mattacola, C. G., Bush, H. M., Thomas, S. M., Foss, K. D. B., Myer, G. D., & Hewett, T.
E. (2017). Preventive Neuromuscular Training for Young Female Athletes: Comparison of Coach and Athlete Compliance Rates. Journal of Athletic Training.
35. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers and Education.
36. Taylor, M. E., & Sanner, J. E. (2017). The Relationship Between Concussion Knowledge and the High School Athlete’s Intention to Report Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of School Nursing.
37. Thein-Nissenbaum, J. M., & Carr, K. E. (2011). Female athlete triad syndrome in the high school athlete. Physical Therapy in Sport.
38. Tight, M., Symonds, P., & Symonds, P. M. (2016). The Case Study as a Research Method. Case Studies.
39. Tyley, S. (2012a). Blended learning. Fire Risk Management.
40. Tyley, S. (2012b). Blended learning. Fire Risk Management.
41. Valenzuela, D., & Shrivastava, P. (2002). Interview as a method for qualitative research. Presentation.
42. Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. (2012). “Triangulation” Research Method as the Tool of Social Science Research. Bup Journal.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
