COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS STUDIES IN 6063 ALUMINIUM ALLOY THERMOSYPHON USING IRON (II, III) OXIDE NANOFLUID

Authors

  • DR.N. ALAGAPPAN Department of Mechanical Engineering, Annamalai University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/gv5gyj78

Keywords:

RSM, CFD, ,6063AA TPCT, e3O4 water based nano fluid

Abstract

This study presents a comparison of the results obtained from experiments response surface methodology(RSM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) of the 6063 aluminium alloy two phase closed thermosyphon (TPCT) using Iron (II, III) oxide(Fe3O4) water based nano fluid. A 17 set of experimental reading were taken by response surface methodology. The input responses are heat input, angle of orientation and flow rate of water in condenser section of TPCT. The output response to be compared with RSM and CFD is thermal resistance (Rth). The data derived from experimental were validated by CFD using Volume of fluid (VOF) model. A reasonable good agreement was obtained between the results of the experimental RSM and CFD.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Faghri, A. (1995). Heat pipe science and technology. Global Digital Press.

2. Manohar, M., Joseph, J., Selvaraj, T., & Sivakumar, D. (2013). Application of Box Behnken design to optimize the parameters for turning Inconel 718 using coated carbide tools. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4(4): 620-644.

3. Perincek, O., & Colak, M. (2013). Use of Experimental Box-Behnken Design for the Estimation of Interactions Between Harmonic Currents Produced by Single Phase Loads. Interactions, 3(2).

4. Krishna, D., & Siva Krishna, K. (2013). Removal of chromium from aqueous solution by borasus flabellifer coir powder as adsorbent. Elixir: Chemical Engineering, 56: 13308-1331.

5. Fadhl, Bandar, Luiz C. Wrobel, and Hussam Jouhara. (2013). Numerical modelling of the temperature distribution in a two-phase closed thermosyphon. Applied Thermal Engineering. 60.1: 122-131

6. Xu, Zhi, et al. (2016). Modeling the phase change process for a two-phase closed thermosyphon by considering transient mass transfer time relaxation parameter. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 101: 614-619.

7. Schwertmann, U., & Cornell, R.M. (2008). Iron oxides in the laboratory: preparation and characterization. John Wiley & Sons

8. Cordova, G., Attwood, S., Gaikwad, R., Gu, F., & Leonenko, Z. (2014). Magnetic Force Microscopy Characterization of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs). Nano Biomed. Eng, 6(1): 31- 39.

9. Huminic, G., Huminic, A., Morjan, I., & Dumitrache, F. (2011). Experimental study of the thermal performance of thermosyphon heat pipe using iron oxide nanoparticles. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 54(1): 656-661.

10. Xie, J., & Jon, S. (2012). Magnetic nanoparticle-based thermostics. Theramostics, 2(1), 122-124.

11. Tae-Keun, H., & Ho-Soon, Y. (2005). Nanoparticle-dispersion-dependent thermal conductivity in nanofluids. Journal of Korean Physical Society, 47: 321.

12. Goshayeshi, H.R., Safaei, M. R., Goodarzi, M., & Dahari, M. (2016). Particle size and type effects on heat transfer enhancement of Ferro-nanofluids in a pulsating heat pipe. Powder Technology, 301: 1218-1226.

13. Solomon, A.B., Mathew, A., Ramachandran, K., Pillai, B.C., & Karthikeyan, V.K. (2013). Thermal performance of anodized two phase closed thermosyphon (TPCT). Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 48: 49-57.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 6 (2020): 24 (6) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

ALAGAPPAN, D. (2020). COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS STUDIES IN 6063 ALUMINIUM ALLOY THERMOSYPHON USING IRON (II, III) OXIDE NANOFLUID. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 2920-2932. https://doi.org/10.61841/gv5gyj78