EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF JUDICIAL COMPUTER AND TECHNICAL EXPERTISES BY THE INVESTIGATORS AND THE COURT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/cday9a57Keywords:
criminal procedure, electronic evidence,, electronic criminal case, information, expertise, , expert opinion.Abstract
Scientific and technological progress does not stand still, and today scientists and lawmakers are predicting the prospects of speedy normative consolidation of the procedure for using the latest technical developments, such as video conferencing (video communication), a strain gauge platform for assessing a person's stressful psychophysical state, a system for conducting “electronic” criminal cases, video protocols, electronic referees and judicial expertise. Based on this, this article discusses and analyzes various aspects of the legal regulation of the use of technical and electronic means in the process of proof. In this case, the author draws attention to the types and significance of the conflict of laws governing forensic-computer expertise, including the collection, verification, and evaluation of evidence.
Downloads
References
1. Federal Criminal Code and Rules. West Group, St. Paul, Minn, 2014. –P. 632-634. http://www.interpol.int. http://www.fraund.org
2. Rasulev A. K. (2017). Some questions of improvement of criminal-legal and criminological measures of fight against crimes in the sphere of information technologies and security. Monograph. –T, University. -
p. 20.
3. Kalinina, E.V. (2016). Evaluation of the findings of computer forensics and their use in evidence of fraud, St. Petersburg, p.18.
5. Polyakov, V.V., Shebalin, A.V. (2013). To the question of the appointment of computer-technical
expertise, the object of which is a smartphone, for crimes in the field of computer information, Collection of materials of forensic readings, ed. Yu.L. Boyko, Barnaul, pp. 53-70.
6. Belkin, R.S. (1997). Forensics course, Moscow, Vol.2, p. 61.
7. Mesheryakova, V.A. (2002) Crimes in the field of computer information: the basics of the theory and practice of investigation. Voronezh, p.102. Kolycheva, A.N. (2019). Fixation of evidence stored on Internet resources. Abstract of PhD thesis, Moscow, p.10.
8. Osipenko, A. L. (2009) Network computer crime: theory and practice of struggle. Monograph. - Omsk: Omsk. Acad. Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia. - p. 479
9. Litvin, I.I. (2018). Modern technical means and problems of their application in proving at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. Abstract of PhD thesis, p. 31.
10. Usov, A.I. (2003). Forensic research of computer tools and systems: the basis of methodological support. Moscow, p.15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
