EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF JUDICIAL COMPUTER AND TECHNICAL EXPERTISES BY THE INVESTIGATORS AND THE COURT

Authors

  • Каdirovа Моkhigul , Khаmitovnа , Department of Criminal Procedure Law and Criminalistics of the Tashkent State University of Law, Tashkent city, Uzbekistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/cday9a57

Keywords:

criminal procedure, electronic evidence,, electronic criminal case, information, expertise, , expert opinion.

Abstract

Scientific and technological progress does not stand still, and today scientists and lawmakers are predicting the prospects of speedy normative consolidation of the procedure for using the latest technical developments, such as video conferencing (video communication), a strain gauge platform for assessing a person's stressful psychophysical state, a system for conducting “electronic” criminal cases, video protocols, electronic referees and judicial expertise. Based on this, this article discusses and analyzes various aspects of the legal regulation of the use of technical and electronic means in the process of proof. In this case, the author draws attention to the types and significance of the conflict of laws governing forensic-computer expertise, including the collection, verification, and evaluation of evidence.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Federal Criminal Code and Rules. West Group, St. Paul, Minn, 2014. –P. 632-634. http://www.interpol.int. http://www.fraund.org

2. Rasulev A. K. (2017). Some questions of improvement of criminal-legal and criminological measures of fight against crimes in the sphere of information technologies and security. Monograph. –T, University. -

p. 20.

3. Kalinina, E.V. (2016). Evaluation of the findings of computer forensics and their use in evidence of fraud, St. Petersburg, p.18.

4. http://www.lex.uz

5. Polyakov, V.V., Shebalin, A.V. (2013). To the question of the appointment of computer-technical

expertise, the object of which is a smartphone, for crimes in the field of computer information, Collection of materials of forensic readings, ed. Yu.L. Boyko, Barnaul, pp. 53-70.

6. Belkin, R.S. (1997). Forensics course, Moscow, Vol.2, p. 61.

7. Mesheryakova, V.A. (2002) Crimes in the field of computer information: the basics of the theory and practice of investigation. Voronezh, p.102. Kolycheva, A.N. (2019). Fixation of evidence stored on Internet resources. Abstract of PhD thesis, Moscow, p.10.

8. Osipenko, A. L. (2009) Network computer crime: theory and practice of struggle. Monograph. - Omsk: Omsk. Acad. Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia. - p. 479

9. Litvin, I.I. (2018). Modern technical means and problems of their application in proving at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. Abstract of PhD thesis, p. 31.

10. Usov, A.I. (2003). Forensic research of computer tools and systems: the basis of methodological support. Moscow, p.15.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Khаmitovnа К. М. ,. (2020). EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF JUDICIAL COMPUTER AND TECHNICAL EXPERTISES BY THE INVESTIGATORS AND THE COURT. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 2662-2674. https://doi.org/10.61841/cday9a57