Public Sector Audit Effectiveness in Malaysia: A Mixed Method Pilot Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/28jykg26Keywords:
Internal Audit Effectiveness,, Government Sector Frauds,, Mixed Method,, Public Sector Audit,, Whistleblowing Practice.Abstract
Issues surrounding internal audit effectiveness are still lacking in the current literature especially on the government sector internal audit. Thus, a mixed method pilot test was conducted to assess the effects of four determinants of the effectiveness of internal audit in the public sector. They include (i) internal audit quality; (ii) proficiency of internal auditors; (iii) independence; and (iv) types of audit. In addition, this study proposes the practice of whistleblowing as a mediating variable in the relationships between the four determinants. A total of 30 final responses were received from internal auditors from public universities for this pilot study survey and an interview with a head of internal auditor was conducted to validate the data. The internal auditors involved in the pilot study exhibited positive and constructive responses hence it confirmed the reliability of the determinants. The impacts from the practice of whistleblowing will provide further evidence to strengthen the internal control system and practices in improving the accountability and transparency of the public sector. This paper further supplements previous literatures on internal audit effectiveness by imploring its nature and determinants in the public sector agencies. This paper pioneers the study that focuses on the relationship of the practices of whistleblowing and public sector effectiveness.
Downloads
References
1. Shamsuddin, A., Manijegar, D. B., Kirupanangtan, K., Rahman, S., and Selvanathan, S. Factors that determine the effectiveness of internal audit functions in the Malaysian public sectors. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 2014, 5(1): 9–17.
2. Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., and Pike, R. Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors. British Accounting Review, 2013, 45(1): 10–23.
3. Razak, S. N. A. A., Noor, W. N. B. W. M., and Zakaria, M. Breaking the silence: The efficacy of whistleblowing in improving transparency. Science Research Journal, 2015, 3(4): 35–39.
4. Said, J., Alam, M. M., Mohamed, D. I. B., and Rafidi, M. Does job satisfaction, fair treatment, and cooperativeness influence the whistleblowing practice in Malaysian Government linked companies? Asia- Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2017, 9(3): 220–231.
5. Ahmad, S. A., Smith, M., and Ismail, Z. Internal whistleblowing intention by internal auditors: A prosocial behaviour perspective. Malaysian Accounting Review, 2013, 12(1): 145–181.
6. Vijayakumar, A., and Nagaraja, N. Effectiveness of internal audit in risk management at public sector enterprises. BVIMR Management Edge, 2012, 5(1): 1–8.
7. Peursem, V. Conversations with internal auditors – The power of ambiguity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 2005, 20(5): 489–512.
8. Badara, M. S., and Saidin, S. Z. The relationship between audit experience and internal audit effectiveness in the public sector organizations. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and
9. Fadzil, F. H., Haron, H., and Jantan, M. Internal auditing practices and internal control system. Managerial Auditing Journal, 2005, 20(8): 844–866.
10. Ahmad, N. H., Othman, R., Othman, R., and Jusoff, K. The effectiveness of internal audit in Malaysian public sector. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 2009, 5( 9): 53–62.
11. Alzeban, A., and Gwilliam, D. Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 2014, 23(2): 74–86.
12. Cohen, A., and Sayag, G. The effectiveness of internal auditing: An empirical examination of its determinants in Israeli organisations. Australian Accounting Review, 2010, 20(3): 241–255.
13. Mihret, D. G., and Yismaw, A. W. Internal audit effectiveness: An Ethiopian public sector case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 2007, 22(5): 470–484.
14. Noor, M. N. R. A., and Mansor, N. Proficiency of internal auditors and effectiveness of public sector audit in malaysian public organizations. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 2019, 28(15): 164–171.
15. Berhe, A. G., Mihret, A. G., and Ali, M. S. The effects of internal audit on performance of Ethiopian
financial institutions. Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, 2016, 7(2): 1–30.
16. Drogalas, G., Karagiorgos, T., and Arampatzis, K. Factors associated with internal audit effectiveness: Evidence from Greece. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 2015, 7(7): 113–122.
17. Florea, R. R., and Florea, R. R. Internal audit and corporate governance. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition, 2013, 16(1): 79–83.
18. Noor, M. N. R. A., and Mansor, N. The mediating role of whistleblowing practice between types of audit and effectiveness of public sector audit. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 2019, 28(15): 140–147.
19. Othman, R., Aris, N. A., Mardziyah, A., Zainan, N., and Amin, N. M. Fraud detection and prevention methods in the Malaysian public sector: Accountants’ and internal auditors’ perceptions. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, 28: 59–67.
20. PWC. Economic Crime: A Threat to Business Globally, Global Economic Crime Survey. Miami: Price Waterhouse Corporation Publisher, 2014.
21. Asiedu, K. F., and Deffor, E. W. Fighting corruption by means of effective internal audit function: Evidence from the Ghanaian public sector. International Journal of Auditing, 2017, 21(1): 82–99.
22. Sekaran, U., and Bougie, R. Research Methods For Business – A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
