Focus Group Discussion of Internal Factors Community Sharing Trends on Self-Efficacy Photographic Images
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/jj11d369Keywords:
Self-Efficacy Photographic Images, Visual Communication, , Online Community, Photography, Focus Group Discussion.Abstract
Communications technology has played an important role in the dissemination of information to the public. This information includes the dissemination on self-efficacy photographic images which transmitted in various forms. Internet is also called as a tool to convince the public of an event. However, not all information obtained from social media is considered to be relevant and appropriate. This article dismantling the key factors which affect the younger generation (youth) which tend to do a photographic image sharing on online Public Housing Program (PHP) community. The method used is the focus groups discussion consisting of twenty- one informants aged between twenty to twenty-four years is also a youth among low income community at PHP Lembah Subang, Selangor. The study is based on internal factors (the narrative, photographic images and themes) and external (Internet and ethics). Five photographic images on self-efficacy (images that are picked from online community at PHP Lembah Subang, Selangor) displayed and should be evaluated by the informants and further sets out their views. The study found that these two factors internal and external) influence the sharing of self- efficacy photographic images to online community. In addition, the subject matter is an important factor which be assessed before the self-efficacy photographic images are shared. However, for younger generation who use low rate Internet are not fully influenced by internal factors (the narrative, photographic images and themes) in partnership photographic images online.
Downloads
References
2. Adham Shadan. (2010). 18 SMS Sehari. Kosmo,
http://www.kosmo.com.my/kosmo/content.asp?y=2008&dt=0911&pub=Kosmo&sec=Infiniti&pg=in_01.html.
4. Ali, M. N. S. (2015). Kerana visual yang mengheret fitnah. Al-Islam. November: 50-52.
6. Ariff, M. I., Milton, S. K., Bosua, R., & Sharma, R. (2011). Exploring the role of ICT in the formation of transactive memory systems in virtual teams. 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality
Research in Pacific, pp.1-12.
8. Draper, R. (2013). The power of photography. National Geographic, 224(4), 28-33.
10. Friend, D. (2011). Watching the world change: The stories behind the images of 9/11. New York : Picador.
12. Goleman, D. (2002). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
14. Hammack, P. L., & Pilecki, A. (2012). Narrative as a root metaphor for political psychology. Political
Psychology, 33(1), 75-103.
16. Harrison, R., & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language
learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 109-124.
18. Jamaludin, R. (2007). Internet dalam pendidikan. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia Press.
20. June Lu, Chun‐Sheng Yu, Chang Liu, James E. Yao. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet.
Internet Research, 13(3), 206 – 222.
22. Kress, G & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images, the grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
24. Levinson, P. (2009). New media. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26. Lipkin, J. (2005). Photography Reborn: Image Making in the Digital Era (Abrams Studio). Harry N. Abrams,
Inc.
28. Mahmud, M. Z., & Omar, B. (2013). Motif dan kekerapan penggunaan Facebook dalam kalangan pelajar
universiti. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 29(1), 35-54.
30. Marsh, A. (2003). The darkroom: Photography and the theatre of desire. Victoria: Palgrave-Macmillan.
32. McMillin, D., & Fisherkeller, J. (2009). Local identities in globalized regions: Teens, everyday life, and
television. Popular Communication, 7(4), 237-251.
34. Richter, A., & Riemer, K. (2009). Corporate social networking sites–modes of use and appropriation through
co-evolution. 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 2-4.
36. Salman, A., Abdullah, M. Y. H., Hasim, M. S., & Pawanteh, L. (2010). Sustainability of Internet usage: A study among Malay youth in Kota Bharu, Kelantan. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 26(1),
62-72.
38. Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students' Facebook use.
Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20(2), 67-75.
40. Szarkowski, J. (2003). Introduction to the photographer's eye. In The Photography Reader, by Liz Wells, 97-
103. New York: Routledge.
42. Thompson, J. B. (2000). The globalization of communication. In David Held & Anthony McGrew (Eds.), The
Global Transformations Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, 202 – 215.
44. Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2012). The evolution of the digital divide: The digital divide turns to inequality of skills
and usage. Digital Enlightenment Yearbook, 2012, 57-75.
46. Ware, C. (2020). Information visualization: Perception for design. Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
