Transformational Leadership of School Improvement Partner (Sipartner +) and Coaching Process in Education Development Leadership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/0xn55t21Keywords:
Transformation Leadership,, School Improvement Partner (SIPartner +), Coaching Process, , Educational Leadership.Abstract
Transformational leadership attends the mission to transform the leadership and organisation. Accordingly, the School Improvement Partner (SIPartner +) employs a coaching method in the guiding process to promote school leaders to make adjustments to the organisation. Nevertheless, the SIPartner + transformation leadership practice research is inadequate. This research explores SIPartner + transformational leadership practice as a mentor in performing transformational leadership of principals and headteachers adopting a coaching approach. The study sample was comprised of 117 SIPartner + employees in the District Education Office (PPD) throughout Malaysia. Quantitative research in the form of surveys involved questionnaire management was adopted to collect data. Selection of study samples was made randomly. Data were analysed utilising SPSS version 23.0. The descriptive findings confirmed that the transformational leadership practices and coaching processes among SIPartner + are at a high level. Also, inference analysis revealed that there is a positive and significant relationship between transformational leadership practice and the coaching process. Additionally, this study designated that SIPartner + transformational leadership leads to leadership advancement among school leaders. Hence, it is recommended that the Leadership Guidance Program should be administered consistently and systematically so that it stays apposite to the contemporary hurdles and demands of the Malaysia education system.
Downloads
References
1. Abdul Razak Alias. (2012). Coaching & Mentoring dalam Pendidikan. Konsep, Peranan, Proses, Membina Kepercayaan, Model dan Praktis. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Negeri Sembilan.
2. Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and Similar Set. California: Mind Garden, Inc.
3. Tolhurst, J. (2010). The essential guide to coaching and mentoring. England: Pearson Education Limited.
4. Boyee, L., Jackson, R., & Neil, L. (2010). Building successful leadership coaching relationship: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching program. Journal of Management Development, 29(10), 914 -931.
5. Choy Mun Wei & Mohd Izham Mohd hamzah .(20180. Amalan Kepimpinan Transformasi Pengetua dan Hubungannya dengan Kepuasan Kerja Guru. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Pendidikan Universiti Awam. http://www.unisza.edu.my/medc2018.
6. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen , E. N. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
7. Goldring , E. B.(1992). Sytem-wide diversity in Israel: Principals as transformational and environmental leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 49-62.
8. Guzman, N. (1997). Leadership for Successful Inclusive Schools: A study of Principal Behavior. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(5), 439-450.
9. Habib Ismail, & Zaimah Ramli.(2012). Amalan Kepimpinan Transformasi Pengetua dan Hubungannya dengan Kepuasan Kerja Guru. Prosiding PERKEM VII, 2, 1471-1478.
10. Heng Jee Soon. (2016). Tinjauan Tanggapan Pemimpin Sekolah terhadap Coaching Kepimpinan dan Impaknya Oleh SIPartner+ PPD Tampin, Negeri Sembilan. Konferensi Kebangsaan Pendidikan Abad Ke- 21.
11. Jackson, Sheril L. (2006). Research methods and statistic: A critical thinking approach. California: Thomson and Wadsworth.
12. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Panduan Pengurusan Program Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Panduan Pengurusan Program Transformasi Daerah. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian.
13. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Panduan Pengurusan program SIPartner. Pahang: Institut Aminuddin Baki.
14. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
15. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Laporan kajian Pelaksanaan School Improvement Specialist Coaches (SISC+) dan School Improvement Partner (SIPartner +) di Kedah dan Sabah. Putrajaya: Sektor Penyelidikan dan Penilaian, Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Pendidikan.
16. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
17. Kunalan Kuriya & Vincent Pang. (2015). Pengaruh Bimbingan School Improvement Partner (SIPartner+) Terhadap pencapaian Sekolah: Kepimpinan Pengetua sebagai Mediator. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan. Jilid 30 Bil03. 55-71. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
18. Learnard, K. (2018). Advantages & disadvantages of people-oriented leadership styles. Available at http://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-disadvantages-peopleoriented-leadershipstyles-10299.html
19. Leithwood , K & Jantzi, D. (1999). The effects of tansformational leadership on organizational condition and student engagement with School. Journal of Education Administration, 38(2), 112-129.
20. Maria Lucia, A.P.C., Lais Helena, R., & Maria, D. (2014). Coaching leadership: Leader’s and Followers perception assessment questionnaires in nursing.University Federal de Sao Paulo.
21. Ong Soo Wei & Azlin Mansor. (2016). Transformsional kepimpinan dalam sistem pendidikan Malaysia. Seminar Majlis Dekan-Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam.
22. Pharion , J. I. (2014). Transformational leadership in coaching. The Dwight Schar College of Education. PhD thesis, Ashland University, Ohio.
23. Rohana Ahmad & Ahmad Martadha Mohamed. (2019). Hubungan Pengaruh Gaya kepimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Pelaksanaan Program Pelan Penggantian Pembangunan Kerjaya dalam Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan, 55, 159 – 167.
24. Sabir, S., Sohail, A. & Khan, M.A. (2011). Impact of leadership style on organization commitment: In A mediating role of employee values. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 3(2), 145-152 .
25. Shamsuddin et al. ( 2015). Kajian keberkesanan peranan SIPartner+ Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Kluang.
26. Shamsuddin Haron. (2016). Peranan Coaching dalam Revilitasi Pendidikan Abad Ke-21. Konferensi Pendidikan Nasional di Kota Tinggi.
27. Sharifah Sofia Abdul Rahman & Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah. (2017). Pelaksanaan program SIPartner+ dan Hubungan dengan Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia di Sekolah Menengah. https://seminarserantau2017.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/42-sharifah-sofiah-abdul-rahman.pdf.
28. Wong Su Huong & Nur Ain Elzira Abdullah .(2018). Bimbingan dan Pementoran Pembimbing pakar Peningkatan Sekolah (SISC+) menurut Perspektif Guru Dibimbing (GDB). International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 3(13), 57-72.
29. Zaidatol Akmaliah dan Soaib Asimiran. (2014). Transformasi Kepimpinan pendidikan: Cabaran dan Hala Tuju.Universiti Putera Malaysia, Selangor.
30. Zawawi Jahya. (1999). Kepimpinan Transformasi dan Kegemilangan Sekolah. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 9(2), 80-97.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
