SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF HUMAN DEATH: INTERPRETATION OF CLINICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEATH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/b0d4pq74Keywords:
human death, clinical and biological death, mytho-epic roots of the concept of death, genesis.Abstract
Human death requires understanding from various points of view in order to identify its role, functions and axiological significance in the life of society and a specific person, to develop certain norms of behavior before the fact of the inevitability and inexorability of death. It is these qualities and properties that give a special shade to the "taste" of life that determine interest in this phenomenon and testify in favor of the theoretical and applied significance of the problem. This article is written with the aim of: establishing the main approaches to the interpretation of the role of death in society and to identify the features of public consciousness in various cultures associated with the interpretation of death; to systematize and characterize ethical standards that have arisen as a result of understanding the inevitability of death, and to develop recommendations for people employed in the field of education and in need of a pedagogical understanding of this phenomenon. In particular, tasks were set as: to consider the role and place of death among the main phenomena that determine the existence of a person, to establish the features of the approaches developed by philosophical thought in comprehending death and near-death phenomena; to analyze the genesis and evolution of ideas about death in the mythical and epic heritage of peoples and the ways in which public consciousness sought to resolve the dilemma "life gives rise to death"; to investigate modern ideas about death and identify the main trends in its interpretation, which have formed in the public consciousness; identify a set of factors leading to the loss of purpose and meaning of life; to show that suicide and euthanasia are human weaknesses that the individual should not resort to even in the most desperate situation; to investigate the process of entering a person’s fear of death, the evolution of this feeling depending on age characteristics, to identify crisis stages in an individual’s life leading to destructive behavior, to develop recommendations for teachers, parents and other interested parties on the prevention of necrophilic behavior.
Downloads
References
1. Anchel E., Jepos i istorija: Per. s veng. M.: Mysl', 1988. – p 126.
2. Aries Ph. Chelovek pered licom smerti: Per. s fr. M.: Izdatel'skaja gruppa "Progress" - "Progress-Akademija", 1992. – p. 528.
3. Bern Je., Vvedenie v psihiatriju i psihoanaliz dlja neposvjashhennyh: Per. s angl. Simferopol': Renome, 1998. – p. 496.
4. Borst A. Zwei mittelalterliche Sterbefalle // Mercur. 1980. Bd. 34. p.1081-1098.
5. Buber M., Dva obraza very: Per. s nem. M.: Respublika, 1995.- p. 464.
6. Chadaev P.Ja. Filosoficheskie pis'ma // Rossija glazami russkogo. -SPb.: Nauka, 1991. pp. 19-138.
7. Fenigsen R. Euthanasie: Een Weldaad. Deventer (Netherlands): Van Loghum Slaterus.
8. Fihte I.G., Sochinenija v dvuh tomah. T.2. SPb.; Mifril, 1993. - p. 798.
9. Frejd A., Psihologija Ja i zashhitnye mehanizmy: Per. s angl. M.: Pedagogika, 1993. – p. 144.
10. Frejd Z., My i smert'. // Rjazancev S. Tanatologija (uchenie o smerti).- SPb.: Vostochno-Evropejsk. institut psihoanaliza, 1994. pp.13-25.
11. Frjezer Dzh., Fol'klor v Vethom zavete: Per. s angl. 2-e izd., ispr. - M: Politizdat, 1989. – p. 542.
12. Fromm Je., Anatomija chelovecheskoj destruktivnosti: Perevod. M.: Respublika, 1994. – p. 447.
13. Fut F. Jevtanazija // Filosofskie nauki. – M. 1990. – # 6. – pp. 62–80.
14. Genon R., Car' mira // Voprosy filosofii. 1993. - #3. - pp.97-133.
15. Glannon W. Temporal asymmetry, life and death // Amer. philos. quart. -Oxford, 1994. Vol. 31, N3. - pp.235-244.
16. Gusserl Je., Filosofija kak strogaja nauka. Novocherkassk, Agentstvo SAGUNA, 1994.- p. 357.
17. Hajdegger M., Vremja i bytie: Stat'i i vystuplenija: Per. s nem. M.: Respublika, 1993. – p. 447.
18. Ivanov V.I., Izhevskaja V.L. Genetika cheloveka: jeticheskie problemy nastojashhego i budushhego. Problemy evgeniki. Biomedicinskaja jetika. – M.: Podred Pokrovskogo, 1997. – p. 98.
19. Jerikson Je., Detstvo i obshhestvo. Izd. 2-e, pererab i dop. / Per. s angl. - SPb.: Lenato, ACT, Fond "Universitetskaja kniga", 1996. – p. 592.
20. Jung K. O zhizni posle smerti // Tajna smerti. – M.: 1995. – p. 135.
21. Jung K., Chelovek i ego simvoly. ~ M.: Serebrjanye niti, 1997. –p. 368.
22. Kamu A., Buntujushhij chelovek. Filosofija. Politika. Iskusstvo: Per. s fr. M.: Politizdat, 1990. – p. 415.
23. Karaboev A.G. Morfofunkcional'nye izmenenija v gipotalamo-gipofizarno-nejrosekretornoj sisteme v processe umiranija i ozhivlenija organizma (Jeksperimental'noe issledovanie): Dissertacija na soiskanie uchjonoj stepeni kandidata medicinskih nauk. – Samarkand: 1998. – p. 24.
24. Klotzko A.J. What kind of life? What kind of death? An interview with dr.Henk Prins // Bioethics. Oxford; Cambr. (Mass.), 1997. - Vol. 11, N1. - pp.24-42.
25. Krajton M. Park jurenogo perioda. – M.: 1993. – p. 7.
26. Kubler-Ross E. Question and answers on death and dying. N.Y.:Mcmillan, 1979.- 177 p.
27. Ljendert G, Igrovaja terapija: iskusstvo otnoshenij: Per. s angl. -M.: Mezhdunarodnaja pedagogicheskaja akademija, 1994. - p. 368.
28. Lorenc K., Agressija (tak nazyvaemoe "zlo"): Per. s nem. M.: Izdat. gruppa "Progress", "Univers", 1994. –
p. 272.
29. Maslou A., Psihologija bytija: Per. s angl. M.: Refl-buk, K.: Vakler, 1997.- p. 304.
30. Menegetti A., Mudrec i iskusstvo zhizni: Per. s ital. Perm': Hor-ton Limited, 1993. – p. 48.
31. Mjej R., Ljubov' i Volja. Per. s angl. M.: Refl-buk; K.: Vakler, 1997. – p. 384.
32. Moudi R., Zhizn' posle smerti: Per. s angl. M.-Riga: Start - Sinek-tika, 1991. – p. 159.
33. Muhamedova Z.M. Biojetika. – Toshkent: Universitet, 2006. – p. 77.
34. Ortega-i-Gasset H. Chto takoe filosofija? M.: Nauka, 1991. – p. 408.
35. Pindar. Vakhilid. Ody. Fragmenty. M.: Nauka, 1980. – p. 504.
36. Put'. Organ religioznoj mysli. Kniga 1. (1-U1). Reprintnoe pereizdanie. M.: Inform-Progress, 1992. – p. 752.
37. Rassel B., Pochemu ja ne hristianin: Izbrannye ateisticheskie proizvedenija / Per. s angl. M.: Politizdat, 1987. – p. 334.
38. Schweitzer A. Epilogue. In: Sc-r A. My Life and Thought. An Autobiography. London, G.Allen and Unwin, 1933. - pp.254-283.
39. Shermuhamedova N.A. XXI asr fanining dolzarb muammolari / Falsafa va fan metodologijasi. – Toshkent: Universitet, 2005. – p. 361.
40. Shestov L. Sochinenija v dvuh tomah. Tom 1. Vlast' kljuchej. M.: Nauka, 1993. – p. 558.
41. Shopengauer A., Izbrannye proizvedenija. M.: Prosveshhenie, 1992.479 s.
42. Shpengler O., Zakat Evropy. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1993. – p. 592.
43. Shtejner R., Vopros vospitanija kak social'nyj vopros. Spiritual'-nye, kul'turno-istoricheskie i social'nye osnovy pedagogiki val'dorfskoj shkoly / Per. s nem. Kaluga: Duhovnoe poznanie, 1992. – p. 108.
44. Tajlor Je., Pervobytnaja kul'tura. M.: Politizdat, 1989. – p. 573.
45. Tejjar de Sharden P. Fenomen cheloveka: Per. s fr. M.: Nauka, 1987. – p.239.
46. Tejjar de Sharden P., Bozhestvennaja sreda: Per. s fr. M.: Izd-vo "Renessans" SP "IVO-SiD", 1992. - 311 s.
47. Tishhenko P.D. Chto takoe avtojevtanazija. Gumanitarnaja jekspertiza // Chelovek. – Moskava. 1992. - #6.
- p. 35.
48. Uajthed A., Izbrannye raboty po filosofii: Per. s angl. M.: Progress, 1990. – p. 718.
49. Uotson L., Oshibka Romeo. // Zhizn' zemnaja i posledujushhaja: Per. s angl. M.: Politizdat, 1991. - pp.212-375.
50. Vejninger O., Pol i harakter. Muzhchina i zhenshhina v mire strastej i jerotiki: Per. s nem. M.: Forum XIX-XX-XXI, 1991 – p.192.
51. Vovelle M. Encore la mort: un peu plus qu!une mode? // Annales, E.S.C. 1982. Vol. 37, N 2. зз.276-287.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
