OOP Languages Comparison
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/a0ydy478Keywords:
Programming Language, Java, C++, Python, SyntaxAbstract
The assessment of Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) languages serves as a complete exploration of the exceptional capabilities, strengths, and concerns associated with various languages inside the OOP paradigm. This abstract delves into the primary OOP languages—Java, C++ , and Python—offering insights into their syntax, performance, and atmosphere, fostering a nuanced expertise for developers and stakeholders seeking to make knowledgeable language choices for their tasks.
Java, a flexible and platform-independent language, has set up itself as a stalwart in enterprise-degree programs. Renowned for its “write once, run anywhere” mantra, Java's syntax emphasizes clarity and maintainability, whilst its robust atmosphere helps significant libraries and frameworks. C++ , however, offers a balance among high-degree and low-stage programming, making it a desired choice for device-stage development. Its efficiency in memory control and assist for object-orientated and procedural programming make it appropriate for overall performance-important programs.
Python, characterized by means of its simplicity and readability, has won tremendous reputation, particularly in net development, statistics technology, and artificial intelligence. Python's dynamic typing and concise syntax make contributions to speedy development cycles, whilst its tremendous libraries enhance productivity. However, the exchange- off frequently involves a sacrifice in execution velocity as compared to languages like Java and C++ .
The summary additionally touches upon the various utility domain names wherein every language excels. Java's occurrence in enterprise software, C ++ 's dominance in systems programming, and Python's versatility in scripting and data-centric applications exemplify their targeted strengths. Additionally, the abstract addresses issues which includes community assist, documentation, and the provision of 0.33-birthday celebration libraries, which play vital roles in the normal developer revel in.
In conclusion, this abstract provides a nuanced assessment of Java, C++ , and Python within the OOP paradigm, offering insights into their syntax, overall performance traits, and alertness domain names. Developers and decision-makers can leverage this comparative evaluation to make knowledgeable alternatives aligned with the particular necessities and goals in their tasks.
Downloads
References
1. Acceleo website, 2014.
2. T. Brtickmann and V. Gruhn, "An Architectural Blueprint for Model Driven Development and Maintenance of Business Logic for Information Systems", Proceedings of the 4th European conference on Software architecture, vol. 10, pp. 53-69, 2010.
3. F. Budinsky, D. Steinberg, E. Merks, R. Ellersick and T. J. Grose, Eclipse Modeling Framework, Addison-Wesley, 2008.
4. K. Dollard, Code Generation in Microsoft. NET, 2004.
5. M. Fowler, Domain Specific Languages, Addison-Wesley, 2010.
6. R. France and B. Rumpe, "Model-Driven Development of Complex Software: A Research Roadmap" in Future of Software Engineering, Computer, pp. 37-54, 2007.
7. D. S. Frankel, Model Driven Architecture: Applying MDA to Enterprise Computing, Wiley, 2003.
8. J. Greenfield, K. Short, S. Cook and S. Kent, Software Factories: Assembling Applications with Patterns Models Frameworks and Tools, Wiley, 2004.
9. Groher I. and M. Voelter, "Aspect-Oriented Model-Driven Software Product Line Engineering" in Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development VI, Springer-Verlag, pp. 111-152, 2009.
10. R. C. Gronback, Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit, Addison-Wesley, 2009.
11. H. Gronniger, J. Hartmann, H. Krahn, S. Kriebel, L. Roth-hardt and B. Rumpe, "Modelling Automotive Function Nets with Views for Features Variants and Modes", Proceedings of Embedded Real Time Software and Systems ERTS ‘08, 2008.
12. H. Gronniger, H. Krahn, B. Rumpe, M. Schindler and S. Volkel, "MontiCore: a Framework for the Development of Textual Domain Specific Languages", 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 925-926, 2008.
13. R. K. Kaushik Anjali and D. Sharma, "Analyzing the Effect of Partial Shading on Performance of Grid Connected Solar PV System", 2018 3rd International Conference and Workshops on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE), pp. 1-4, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
