NOTION OF JUDICIAL ETHICS – A COMPARATIVE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/6q1phy17Abstract
Judiciary nevertheless retained its image as one of the few institutions of the country, which is still above the deterioration, that prevails in most organs of the State. But, the whispered accusations on the judiciary have sown the seeds of doubt even in the minds of the most enthusiastic believers in the integrity of judiciary, including senior members of the bar, former members of the bench, and the parliamentarians as also the common man on the streets. The consequent demand for accountability from all seniors has given rise to a furious debate between supporters of the judicial self-discipline on one hand and operational autonomy on the other. This study aims to analyse the meaning and need and to discuss the approaches followed by various jurisdictions towards judicial ethics.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
