Explain the theoretical foundations of digital modernism and its educational implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/djy54z88Keywords:
digital modernism,, modernism, postmodernism, theoretical foundations,, digitalAbstract
Today, digital is one of the most common and familiar words that we are all involved with in some way and has left various effects on aspects of individual and social life, including education. This project aims to explain the theoretical foundations of digital modernism as a new paradigm that was born after postmodernism and also to express its educational implications. The method of the present research is done by descriptive method and concept analysis, which first by explaining the concepts of digital modernism and then by analyzing its concepts to obtain the educational implications of digital modernism. Since in the present study, the type of data is non-statistical, so the method of data collection is library. The research findings show that despite the fact that DJ Modernism is historically behind postmodern, but from a cognitive point of view, it is a concept that oscillates between modernity and postmodern. Also, the educational implications of digital modernism can be examined in at least six areas, all of which have a common chapter based on digital.
Downloads
References
1. MasoudSafaeiMoghaddam; Mohammad JafarPakseresht, Philosophical Hermeneutics and a New Narrative of "Presence-Absence" in the Field of Education, Journal of Educational Sciences, ShahidChamran University, Ahvaz
2. Jameson, Frederick (2000) Postmodernism of the Cultural Logic of Capitalism, translated by Majid Majidi, 3. FarhangRajaei and FatemehGivehchian, Tehran, Hermes Publications.
4. Kahoon, Lawrence Yeh (2005) Selected Texts from Modernism to Postmodernism, Persian Editor AbdolkarimRashidian, Fourth Edition, Tehran, Ney Publishing.
5. Jenks, Charles (1995) What is postmodernism ?, Translated by FarhadMortezaei, First Edition, Mashhad: Marandiz.
6. Jameson, Frederick (2000) Postmodernism of the Capitalist Cultural Logic, translated by Majid Majidi, FarhangRajaei and FatemehGivehchian, Tehran, Hermes Publications.
7. Derrida, Jacques (2011) About GrammaTologie, translated by Mehdi Parsa, Tehran: New Happening.
8. Paul Christiane digital art Thames & Hudson 2006
9. Wands Bruse art of the digital age Thames & Hudson 2006
10. Angelo, T.A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. 11.Allen.s&Seaman (2003). sizing the opportunity the quality and extent of online education in the united states. 12.Bloland, H. G. (1995). Postmodernism and Higher Education. Journal of Higher. 66 (5).
13. Berger, A. Asa (1998). The postmodern presence:Readings on postmodernism in America,culture and society .WlanuGreek,London.newdelhi:Altamira press.
14. Beck, C. (1999). Post modernism pedugogy and philosophy of Education, Educational theory 15.Bauman, Z. (2000). liguidmodennity. Oxpord: polity
16. Boyd, B.L. (2001). Formative classroom assessment: Learner focused. The Agricultural Education Magazine, 73(5), 18-19.
17. Brandom, R. (2003). Rorty and his critics, Black well
18. Carr, D. (1998). Education, Knowledge and Truth: Beyond the postmodern Impass, London. AnNewYork. 19.Edwards, R. and usher. R. (2005). Lifelong: A postmodern condition of Education. Adult Education
Quarterly, vol. 51. No.4
20. Fuss. D. (1999). Essentially speaking: Feminism, nature and diferenc. Rout ledge. New yourk. P. 18.
21. Goldman J. (1996). The interplay of universality and dirersity in today, s classrom. Porter college. UCSC. 22.Good, T.l&Brofy, J.E. (1999). Educational psychology : A realistic approach. (4ed) white plains, NY:
longman
23. Gray, C. (1999). Pragmatism liberalism and the critigue of modernity. Combridge university press
24. Giroux, H.A. (2003). Public Pedagogy and Politics of Resistance: Note On a Critical Theory of Educational Struggle, Educational Philosophy and Theory
25. Hilgard, E.R., & Bower, G.H. (1975). Theories of learning. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 26.Harris, J.J. (1995). Organizing and facilitating Telecollaborative projects, the compating teacher
27. Hatch, M. J.(1997). Organization Theory, Modern, Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives, Oxford University Press, 1997.
28. Huba, M.E., & Freed, J.E. (2000). Learner- Centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Heslep, R. (2001). Habermas on communication in teaching. Education theory. Vol. 51. No. 2.
31. Hirumi, A. (2002). Student- Centered, technology- rich, learning environments (SCen TRLW): Operationalizing constructivist approaches to teaching and learning. Journal for Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 497-537.
32. Howland, J.L., & Moore, J.L. (2002). Student perceptions as distance learners in Interner- based courses.
Distance Educaion
33. McCormick, R. and Scrimshaw. P. (2003). Information and communications thecnology, knowledge and pedugogy. Education, Commuication and Information, Vol. 7. No. 7.
34. Ozmon, S. Craver.M, (2007). Philosophical Foundations of Education. New Jersy
35. Pinar, w. (1996). understanding curriculum. Peterlang publishing, Inc.New York.
36. parker, s. (1997). Reflective Teching in the postmodern word. philadelphia: srhe& open university press 37.Pratt, D. (1998). Five perspectives on teaching in a dult and higher education. Malabar, FL: Krieger
PapastePhanou, m. (1999). Discourse theory and its implications for philosophy of educa. Journal of philosophy of Education, Vol. 33. No. 3.
39. Palmer. J. A,(2000). Fifty Modern Thinkers On Education From Piaget To The Present, New York International Press
40. Peter,T, (2000). Jacques Derrida as a Philosopher of Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory. 41.Philips, D. C. (2000). Possitivism and Educational Research. Rowman and littlefiold publishers
42. Petterway, A. (2010). Implementing postmodernism In changing The Role of school Educators and Administrators In American's schools, A & M. university, Texas
43. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. New York.
44. Rorty, R, (2003). Respose to Norman Gevas and molly cohran, In M. Festenste in and S. Thom psonrichardRorty: Critical Dialogues, polity Rress.
45. Saettler. P. (1990). the evaluation of American education al technologhyEnglewood co libraries unlimited, Inc.
46. Smith, P.L., & Ragan, T.J. (2000). The impact of R.M. Gagne's work on instructional theory. In R.C. Richey (Ed.), The legacy of Robert M. Gagne (PP. 147-181).Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
47. Saba, F. (2003). Distance education theory, methodology and epistemology: A pragmatic paradigm. In M.G more & W.G Anderson
48.(Eds). The handbook of Distance Education.
49. Sylvia, m. R. (2003). Philosophy of education. (www. Tand f. Co.uk)
50. Sommer, R. (1976). Classroom ecology. Journal of Applied Bihaivioral science. 3.
51. Vanderstraten, R. (2001). The school class as an interaction order, British Journal of sociology of Education, vol. 22. No. 2.
52. Villaba, C., &Romiszowski, A.J. (2001). Current and ideal practices in designing, developing, and delivering Web- based training. In B. Kahn (Ed.), Web-based training (pp. 325-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Rechnology Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
