Social Network Analysis: A Distinctive Research Approach in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/mcnxve12Keywords:
Actors, Networks, Social Capital,, Social Network AnalysisAbstract
This article attempts to provide an overview of the Social Network Analysis (SNA) in the mainstream research endeavors in the social and behavioral sciences. The study describes the conceptual, theoretical and substantive foundations of social network analysis as research methodology. SNA is an interdisciplinary research methodology in exploring a wide range of topics, issues and problems across various disciplines. The study of social networks is a powerful research tool for the discovery of a wide range of human behaviors and problems. The article also discusses some of the dilemmas and controversies that revolve around the methods of SNA. Lastly, the article suggests about the potential usefulness of SNA for scholars, researchers, policy-makers and practitioners engaging in addressing the multifaceted human problems across various disciplines in general and social sciences practice in particular.
Downloads
References
1. Barnes, A J. (1969). Networks and the political process. In J. C. Mitchell (Ed), Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns (pp. 51-74). Manchester: Manchester University Press
2. Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators and Coalition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Borgatti, S., Everet, M. & Johnson, J. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage publications.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 23-45). New York: Greenwood Press
5. Bridge, G. (2002). The Neighborhood and Social Networks: Economic and Social Research Council for Neighborhood Research Center, Retrieved 23 May 2012 from http://www.neighbourhoodcentere.org.uk.
6. Bruhn, J. G. (2011). The Sociology of Community Connections (2nd ed). New York: Springer.
7. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95- 120.
9. Cox, M. (2009). Reporting the greater odds: Dissent and militancy among trusting East-Central European Citizens, In M. Cox (Ed), Social Capital and Peace-Building: Creating and Resolving Conflict with Trust and Social Networks (pp. 22-37). New York: Routledge.
10. Crow, G. (2004). Social networks and social exclusion: An overview of the debate, In Phillipson. C , Allan.
G. & Morgan. D. (Eds), Social Networks and Social Exclusion: Sociological and Policy Perspectives (pp. 7- 20). London: MPG Books Ltd.
11. Duijn, A.J. & Vermunt, J.K. (2006). What is special about social network analysis? Methodology, 2(1), 2-6.
12. Freeman, L.C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science.
Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.booksurge.com.
13. Gilbert, L. (2009). Analyzing the dark side of social capital: Organized crime in Russia, In Cox. M. (Ed), Social Capital and Peace-building: Creating and Resolving Conflict with Trust and Social Network (pp.57- 75 ). New York: Routledge.
14. Gilchrist, A. (2004). The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development.
UK: University of Bristol
15. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78,136-1380.
16. Hanneman, A. (2009). Introduction to social network methods: On-line text book for teaching sociology:
University of California.
17. Kirke, D. M. (2009). Social network analysis. In M. Gray & S. A. Webb (Eds), Social Work Theories and Practice (pp. 131-142). London: Sage Publications
18. Lin, N & Erickson, B. (2008). Social Capital: An International Research Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.6 pp. 435-463
20. Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks In J. C. Mitchell (Ed), Social Networks in Urban Situations: Analyses of Personal Relationships in Central African Towns (pp. 1-50). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
21. Pescosolido, B.A. (2007). The sociology of social networks. In C. D. Bryant, D.L. Peck & P.M. Bryant (Eds.), 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook , Vol.1 (pp.208-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy work: Civil tradition in modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University press, Retrieved September 23, 2010, from http://www.librarything.com/work/69269
23. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion networks, In R, Cross, A. Parker & L, Sassoon (Eds), Networks in Knowledge Economy (pp. 281-334). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Rosas, R. E. (2001). Social networks and urban poverty, Development and Society, 30 (2), 41-56.
25. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26. Wellman, B. (1981). Applying network analysis to the study of support. In Gottlieb, B. (Ed), Social Networks and Social Support. London: Sage Publications
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
