A comparative study of Therapeutic oral hygiene versus conventional oral hygiene among patients having Ryle’s Tube

Authors

  • Manisha C. Gholap Associate Professor, Krishna Institute of Nursing Sciences, Karad Author
  • Dr Mahadeo Shinde Professor, Krishna Institute of Nursing Sciences, Karad Author
  • Samir K. Choudhari Clinical Instructor, Krishna Institute of Nursing Sciences, Karad Author
  • Sanila M.Thomas B.B.sc. Nursing Student, Krishna Institute of Nursing Sciences, Karad Author
  • Asha K. Koshy B.B.sc. Nursing Student, Krishna Institute of Nursing Sciences, Karad Author
  • Silpa Mathew B.B.sc. Nursing Student, Krishna Institute of Nursing Sciences, Karad Author
  • Shubham Pawar B.B.sc. Nursing Student, Krishna Institute of Nursing Sciences, Karad Author
  • Sneha Patil B.B.sc. Nursing Student, Krishna Institute of Nursing Sciences, Karad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/v5ksyz90

Keywords:

effectiveness, therapeutic oral hygiene, conventional oral hygiene, Ryle’s Tube

Abstract

Background: Patients with Ryle’s Tube may be more vulnerable to oral disease and discomfort than the general population and may be unable to care for themselves. Oral health is a functional, structural, physiologic, and psychosocial statee of well-being and essential to an individual’s general health and quality of life.

Objective: To compare the effect of therapeutic oral hygiene and conventional oral hygiene among patients having Ryle’s tube.

Methods: An experimental research design was used to conduct the study among patients admitted to the general wards, and a total of 64 patients were selected by purposive sampling technique and further divided into 32 in the experimental group and 32 in the control group. Data was collected by using a structured questionnaire. Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants. An oral hygiene assessment tool was used to assess the oral condition. To the experimental group, 4-hourly mouthwash is given with sodium chloride and sodium bicarbonate, and to the conventional group, regular hospital routine management is followed. After 5 days, oral condition was assessed to compare the effect of the methods.

Results: The mean of the experimental group was 10.406 with an SD of 1.103, and the mean of the control group was 2.468 with an SD of 1.244. The calculated t-value was7, which was found to be statistically significant at the level of 0.0001.

Conclusion: Study results conclude that the therapeutic method was found effective to improve the oral hygiene of patients with Ryles tubes. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Hamuro, A., Honda, M., & Tanaka, R. (2017). Oral care and prevention of pneumonia after withdrawal of nasogastric tube feeding in three elderly patients with psychiatric disorders. Clinical case reports, 6(1), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1294

2. Atashi V, Yousefi H, Mahjobipoor H, Bekhradi R, Yazdannik A. Effect of oral care program on prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: A randomized controlled trial. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2018;23:486-90

3. Azodo CC, Unamatokpa B. Gender difference in oral health perception and practices among medical house officers. Russian Open Med J. 2012;1:1–4.

4. Oberoi, S. S., Mohanty, V., Mahajan, A., & Oberoi, A. (2014). Evaluating awareness regarding oral hygiene practices and exploring gender differences among patients attending for oral prophylaxis. Journal of the Indian Society of Periodontology, 18(3), 369–374.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.134580

Downloads

Published

31.07.2020

How to Cite

C. Gholap, M., Shinde, M., K. Choudhari, S., M.Thomas, S., K. Koshy, A., Mathew, S., Pawar, S., & Patil, S. (2020). A comparative study of Therapeutic oral hygiene versus conventional oral hygiene among patients having Ryle’s Tube. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 7712-7721. https://doi.org/10.61841/v5ksyz90