The Corporation as One of the Actions in Narcotics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/s8d6cb07Keywords:
Corporations, Perpetrators, Circulation, Narcotics, IndonesiaAbstract
Corporate crimes are often referred to as organizational crimes or crimes committed by legal entities. Corporations can be criminally accounted for, because crimes committed by corporations have a huge loss to society, the environment and the country. In fact, some corporate cases are not only as a means to commit crimes, but are used as a means to collect proceeds of crime so that corporations benefit from the proceeds of crime. Indonesian criminal law has recognized corporations as subjects of criminal law since the emergence of Emergency Law No. 17 of 1951 concerning the Stockpiling of Goods, and Law No. 7 of Emergency of 1955 concerning Economic Criminal Act (Wet Economic Delichten). However, the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) has not explicitly regulated corporate responsibility as a criminal offender. Therefore in practice law enforcement has a different interpretation of the corporation. In the context of narcotics distribution, corporations can act as producers. the container and those who distribute narcotics to the public. To ensnare corporations as narcotics awareness offenders, Article 130 of Law 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics may be subject. These provisions can revoke business licenses and company management can also be given other legal actions.
Downloads
References
1. Adhitia, F. B. (2017). Sepanjang Tahun 2017, BNN Ungkap 46.537 Kasus Narkoba. Retrieved January 2,
2019, from www.idntimes.com website: https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/fitang-adhitia/sepanjangtahun-2017-bnn-ungkap-46537-kasus-narkoba/full
2. Armaghani, H. (2018). Kebijakan Indonesia pada Era Pemerintahan Presiden Joko Widodo dalam Mewujudkan ASEAN Drug Free Area. Journal of International Relations, 4(2), 122–131.
3. Bossouni, M. C. (1978). Substantive Criminal Law. London: Charles C Thomas Pub Ltd.
4. Budianto, A. (2012). Delik Suap Korporasi di Indonesia (1st ed.). Bandung: CV.Karya Putra Darwati.
5. Diantha, I. M. P. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta:
Prenanda Media Group.
6. Jenner, M. S. (2011). International Drug Trafficking: A Global Problem with a Domestic Solution. Indiana
Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18(2), 901–927.
7. Kiaking, C. J. (2017). Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Menurut Hukum Pidana Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 35
Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Lex Crimen, 6(1), 106–114.
8. McCrudden. (2006). Legal Research and the Social Sciences. Law Quarterly Review, 4, 632–650.
9. Morgan, C. J. (2013). Harms and Benefits Associated with Psychoactive Drugs: Findings of an International
Survey of Active Drug Users. J. Psychopharmacol, 27(6), 497–506.
10. Muladi. (1995). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
11. Nwator, A. O. (2013). Corporate Criminal Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis. Journal AfricanLaw,
57(1), 83.
12. Primantari, V. A. (2013). Efektifitas Kampanye Anti Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Terhadap Pengetahuan dan
Sikap Remaja Akan Bahaya Penyalahgunaan Narkoba (Studi Terhadap Remaja di Kelurahan Sukaraja
Kecamatan Teluk Betung Selatan, Kota Bandar Lampung). Jurnal Sociologie, 1(2), 93–94.
13. QC, A. P. (2008). Corporate Criminal Liability. USA: Sweet & Maxwell.
14. Rowe, S. E. (2009). Legal Research, Legal Analysis, and Legal Writing: Putting Law School into Practice. SSRN ELibrary, 1193(2000), 1–19.
15. Sakti, N. W. (2018). Memerangi Narkoba. Media Keuangan, XIII(127), 3.
16. Saputra, I. (2017). Aktualisasi Nilai Pancasila Sebagai Kunci Mengatasi Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Di
Indonesia. Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(2), 35.
17. Sasangka, H. (2003). Narkotika dan Psikotropika Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Mandar Maju.
18. Sekretariat DPR RI. (2017). Laporan Singkat Rapat Dengar Pendapat Komisi III DPR RI dengan Badan
Narkotika Nasional: Bidang Hukum, Perundang-Undangan, HAM dan Keamanan. Jakarta: Sekretariat DPR
RI.
19. Susanti, H. (2018). Latar Belakang Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika didalam UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. UIR Law Review, 2(1), 266–277.
20. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Annual Progress Report. USA.
21. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2017). The Drug Problem And Organized Crime, Illicit Financial Flows, Corruption and Terrorism, World Drug Report, United Nations publication, 2017, hlm. 15-19. USA: United Nations publication.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
