A Pragmatic Study of Evasion in Theresa Mays' Political Interviews
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/n6x48j18Keywords:
A Pragmatic Study, Theresa Mays, Political InterviewsAbstract
Evasion is defined as a strategy, used by politicians trying not to give direct answer or to escape from the right answer The present paper aims to study the evasion strategy in the political interviews; the study investigates evasion in Theresa May's political interviews on a pragmatic level. The present study presents a brief definition of evasion, types of evasion, which type is heavily used by May, functions that she fulfilled in her interviews, and what tactics she used to evade answering the question. This study also investigates which maxim of Grice is violated in the political interviews. The analysis consists of data on six texts of interviews with Theresa May from 2016 to 2019. The results summarize the conclusions that the study reached. Among these conclusions is that evasion has an essential role in the political interviews, and politicians tend to use it to fulfill certain functions, such as talking about special issues that lead to arguments in the media. Politicians also tend to evade answering the question in covert ways more than overt. Grice's Maxims are violated by politicians, especially relevance and manner. Politicians use several techniques in order to evade the question; diplospeak" is most widely used by them.
Downloads
References
Bluma-Kulka, S.(1983). The dynamics of Political interviews. Text39(2),Bl-153.
Brown and levinson, S. (1979). Universal in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In: Goody(ed.). Questions and politeness:
Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Bull, P.E.(2003). The microanalysis of political interviews. Leverhulme Trust, University of York.
_______(2008).Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity. Equivocation and face work in noncommittal discourse. Journal of
Language and Social Psychology.
Bradak, J.J.(1993). Reading Ephesian: Exploring Social Entrepreneurship in the Text. Power in Language: Verbal
Communication and Social Influence. Language Behaviors. London: Sage.
Clayman, S.(1988). ''Displaying neutrality in television news interviews''. Social problems. V.4pp-492.
___________(1993). Organization, Society and Politics: An Aristotelian''. Social problems. V.44 pp.474-492.
___________(2001). Answers and evasions. Language in society, 30 (3).403-406.
Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Clayman, S. and Whalen,(1987).Applied Conversation Analysis: Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk. C. Antaki (ed).
London.sage.
Cohen, L. J.(1987). Using verbal reports in research on language learning. In Faerch, C. and G. Kasper (eds.) Introspection in
second language research, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters:82-95.
Fairclough, N.L.(1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fowlerdew, J.(2-013b). purpose. English for research publication purposes: In paltidge, B. and Star: The handbook of English
for specific purposes. Malden, MA; Wiely- Blackwell.
Furko, P. and Agnes, Abuczkii.(2014). ''English Discourse Markers in Mediatised political Interviews''. Brno studies in English.Vol.40 No.1:45-46.
Furo, Hiroko.(2001). Turn-taking in English and Japanese: Project ability in Grammar, Intonation, and Semantics. New York:Routledge.
Galasinski, D.(1996). Language in the media: Representations, Identities, Ideologies. London publications.
____________(20000). The Language of Deception: A discourse analytical study. London, Sage publications, Inc.
Greatbath, D.(1988). A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in Society, 17(3),401-403.
Grice, H.P.(1975). ''Logic and Conversation''. In P. Cole and J. Morgan. Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3 speech Acts. New York:
Academic press.
_______(1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University of press.
Hannan, E.(1986).''Arbitration: A Risky Method for Resolving Diputes,'' in forensic Engineering : Learning from failures, k.
carper, ed., American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
Harris, S.(1991). Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scnnel (ed). Broadcast talk:
76-99. London sage.
Mark L. Knapp and Anita L. Vangelisti(1992). Interpersonal Communication and Human Relationships. London sage.
Lauerbach, G.(2001). Implicit communication in political Interviews: Negotiation the agenda. In Negotiation and power in
dialogue interaction, ed. Edd a weigand and Marcelo Dascal, 214-197. Amsterdam. John Benjamin publishing company.
Mackenzie, S. (2005). The SAGE Dictionary of Criminology: Criminal and Victim profiles in Art Theft: Motive, Opportunity and Repeat Victimisation. SAGE publishing.
Obeng, Samuel Gyasi.(1997). Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse. Discourse and Society no.8, 38-49.
_______________(2002). The Language of politics. Baverly and Hartford(eds.) surviving through obligueneness: Language of politics in Emerging democracies. New York: Nova Science publishers. Pp.5-18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
