Stereotypes of the Christian Citizen towards the other a Sample of Christian Citizens in Baghdad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/8pmybd16Keywords:
Stereotypes, Christian Citizen,, Gender, Social Status,, Academic Achievement.Abstract
The research aimed to know stereotypes perceptions of the Christian citizen towards the other. The sample consisted of (84) of the Iraqi Christian citizens who live in the city of Baghdad of both genders. Their ages ranged between (18-50) years, with an average of (21) years. A scale designed for this purpose meets all requirements for psychometrics. It consisted of (24) paragraphs, measuring the concept of stereotypical perceptions towards the other, and the psychometric properties of it were calculated, and the degree of reliability reached an alpha equation (0.78). The results of the research showed that the perceptions held by the members of the sample are positive towards other groups.
Downloads
References
[1] Abdullah, M. (1989) Intolerant Trends, World of Knowledge Series No. 137, National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters, Kuwait.
[2] Al-Badainah, D. (1999) Stereotypes of Arabs, the West, and Jews among Jordanian students, Journal of Humanities, No. (11), Riyadh. P. 34.
[3] Al-Tamimi, B. (2004) Cognitive structures and stereotypes and their relationship to expectations of sexual role, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Baghdad, College of Arts.
[4] Atkinson, R, Atkinson, R, C., Smith, E (1990): Introduction to psychology tenth edition. HBJ. Harcourt brace Jouanouich publish. New york.
[5] Bruner, J. Tagiuri, R. & Lindzey, G. (1954): Handbook of Social Psychology, Addison Wesley Publishing Com, INC. Vol. (11).
[6] Cauthen, R. Robinson, I. & Krauss, H. (1977) The Effect of Context on Stereotype Traits, The Journal of Social Psychology, 101:1, 127-134.
[7] Duck, J. (2000) Social Psychology and Intolerance, translated by Abdel Hamid Safwat, Dar Al-Fikr Al- Arabi, Cairo.
[8] Glick, P. (2001) Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash toward Agentic Women. Journal of Social Issues. 57 (4), pp.743–762.
[9] International Religious Freedom Report for.(2013) United States Department of State. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.
[10] Majeed, Z. (2006) The theory of mental image and the problematic relationship with profiling. Journal of Scientific Researcher, Baghdad University, No.(2), pp.117-147.
[11] McFillen, R. & Gross R. (2002) An Introduction to Social Psychology, 1st floor, translation by Dr. Mowaffaq Al-Hamdani and others, Wael Publishing House, Jordan.
[12] Tajfel, H. (1978) Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
[13] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979) The social identity theory of inter group behaviour. In: S. Worchel and W. Austin (Eds.) Psychology of inter group relations Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
[14] Tajfel, H.(1981).Human Group and Social Categorization. England: Cambridge University Press.
[15] Zayed, A. (2006) Psychology of relations between groups, Kuwait, Knowledge World Series, National Council for Culture and Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
