Transparency and Corruption: Does E-Government Effective to Combat Corruption?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/40rtvk86Keywords:
Transparency, Corruption, E-Government, Supervision, PreventionAbstract
This study aims to analyze whether the implementation of e-government in the local government environment in Indonesia is effective in fighting corruption. Through a qualitative approach, the results of this study have revealed the enormous implications of e-government in fighting corruption. The implementation of e- governance in Indonesia aims to improve public services by promoting transparency and accountability in order to prevent corruption. With the application of this system, it is expected that the practices of corruption, collusion and nepotism can be prevented and able to oversee regional planning and development in Indonesia. In practice, the application of electronic-based public services or e-government has not been effective in preventing corruption in local government in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
1. Abdelsalam, H. M., Reddick, C. G., & El Kadi, H. A. (2012). Success and failure of local e-government projects: lessons learned from Egypt. In Digital Democracy: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 183-201). IGI Global.
2. Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. (2010). Implementation of e-government: advantages and challenges. In International Association for Scientific Knowledge (IASK).
3. Amiruddin. (2010). Korupsi dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
4. Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201-210.
5. Anoruo, E., & Braha, H. (2005). Corruption and economic growth: the African experience. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 7(1), 43-55.
6. Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare. gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161-173.
7. Asgarkhani, M. (2005). Digital government and its effectiveness in public management reform: A local government perspective. Public Management Review, 7(3), 465-487.
8. Basu, S. (2004). E‐ government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109-132.
9. Bhatnagar, S. (2003). Transparency and corruption: Does e-government help. DRAFT Paper prepared for the compilation of CHRI, 1-9.
10. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E- government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
11. Brueckner, A. (2005). E‐ government II. Best practices for digital government. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 31(3), 16-16.
12. Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (Eds.). (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage Publications.
13. Cho, Y. H., & Choi, B. D. (2004). E-government to combat corruption: The case of Seoul metropolitan government. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(10), 719-735.
14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage publications.
15. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130.
16. Del Monte, A., & Papagni, E. (2001). Public expenditure, corruption, and economic growth: the case of Italy. European journal of political economy, 17(1), 1-16.
17. De Vaal, A., & Ebben, W. (2011). Institutions and the relation between corruption and economic growth. Review of Development Economics, 15(1), 108-123.
18. Drury, A. C., Krieckhaus, J., & Lusztig, M. (2006). Corruption, democracy, and economic growth. International political science review, 27(2), 121-136.
19. Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: an empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114-126.
20. Gyimah-Brempong, K. (2002). Corruption, economic growth, and income inequality in Africa. Economics of governance, 3(3), 183-209.
21. Hartana, M. (2015). Efektivitas Penerapan E-Government dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Lingkungan Pemerintahan Daerah. Panggung Hukum Jurnal Perhimpunan Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Cabang Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, 1(2).
22. Hennida, C., Felayati, R. A., Wijayanti, S. H., & Perdana, A. R. (2017). Budaya dan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Jepang, Korea Selatan dan China. Global Strategis, 10(2), 248-263.
23. Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of economic surveys, 15(1), 71-121.
24. Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42-50.
25. Krishnan, S., Teo, T. S., & Lim, V. K. (2013). Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: A cross-country analysis. Information & Management, 50(8), 638-649.
26. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 2014 concerning State Civil Apparatus.
27. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 1999 concerning State Administration that is Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism.
28. Leite, M. C., & Weidmann, J. (1999). Does mother nature corrupt: Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth. International Monetary Fund.
29. Manurung, E. D., Sembiring, S. N. R., & Sulistyani, W. (2019). Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Elektronik dan Perilaku Anti Korupsi. Veritas et Justitia, 5(2), 399-420.
30. Milles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publication.
31. Mistry, J. J., & Jalal, A. (2012). An empirical analysis of the relationship between e-government and corruption. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 12.
32. Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of comparative economics, 29(1), 66-79.
33. Moleong, L. J. (2009). Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
34. Mpinganjira, M. (2013). E-government project failure in Africa: Lessons for reducing risk. African Journal of Business Management, 7(32), 3196.
35. Ojha, A., Palvia, S., & Gupta, M. P. (2008). A model for impact of e-government on corruption: Exploring theoretical foundations. Critical thinking in e-governance, 160-170.
36. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage Publications.
37. Piatkowski, M. (2006). Can information and communication technologies make a difference in the development of transition economies?. Information Technologies & International Development, 3(1), pp-39.
38. Podobnik, B., Shao, J., Njavro, D., Ivanov, P. C., & Stanley, H. E. (2008). Influence of corruption on economic growth rate and foreign investment. The European Physical Journal B, 63(4), 547-550.
39. Presidential Instruction of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2003 concerning National Policies and Strategies for E-Government Development.
40. Rahayuningtyas, D. P. A., & Setyaningrum, D. (2018). Pengaruh Tata Kelola dan E-Government terhadap Korupsi. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan), 1(4), 431-450.
41. Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge university press.
42. Santoso, L., & Meyrasyawati, D. (2015). Model Strategi Kebudayaan dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Review Politik, 5(01), 22-45.
43. Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298-316.
44. Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of economic perspectives, 19(3), 19-42.
45. Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Staff Papers, 45(4), 559-594.
46. Nasr, G., Hassan, A., Ahmed, S., Serwah, A.Predictors of large volume paracantesis induced circulatory dysfunction in patients with massive hepatic ascites(2010) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 1 (3),
pp. 136-144.
DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.70914
47. Kalaivani Selvaraj, Girija Sivakumar, Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan, Vijaya S Dandannavar, Geetha Royapuram Veeraraghavan, Gayathri Rengasamy. "Asparagus Racemosus - A Review." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 10.1 (2019), 87-89. Print. doi:10.5530/srp.2019.1.14
48. Rathika, S.K.B., Bhavithra, J.An efficient fault tolerance quality of service in wireless networks using weighted clustering algorithm(2012) Bonfring International Journal of Research in Communication Engineering, 2 PART 4 (1).
49. Mensky, M.B. Everett interpretation and quantum concept of consciousness(2013) NeuroQuantology, 11 (SUPPL. 1), pp. 85-96.
50. G.Suseendran, E.Chandrasekaran “Interference Reduction Technique in Mobile Adhoc Networks Using Mathematical Prediction Filters, International Journal of Computer Applications, Volume 60, Issue.6, December 2012. pp-9-16 Doi: 10.5120/9694-0843
51. Noor Zaman, Tung Jang Low, Alghamdi, “Energy efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor network”, in 16th IEEE International Conference on Advance Communication Technology ICACT 2014,. February 2014,
pp. 808-814 Korea
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
