Inappropriate Admission and Hospitalization in Maternity and Children Teaching Hospital in Al-Diwaniya City, Iraq
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/rs25c363Keywords:
Appropriate Evaluation Protocol (AEP), Inappropriate Admission, IraqAbstract
Objectives: Assessment of the degree and associated factors of inappropriateness of admission in children's hospital wards in Al-Diwaniya city, Iraq, with the impact of other variables. Methods: It is a cross-sectional study on a sample of children who presented in the emergency unit of the children's teaching hospital. The following data were taken, which include sociodemographic qualities, address, the date, ward, the days of the week, and admission types. The study was performed over a 6-month period (December 2016 to June 2017). All 1,723 admissions were reviewed. (Using the Pediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for child patients). Results: A total of 1723 children were surveyed. Overall, 25.1% of the hospital's admissions appeared to be inappropriate. Our result shows their proper admission was significantly higher with the age between 1 and 5 years (p < 0.001). The inappropriate hospitalizations were essentially higher if patients were female and if admissions were non-urgent. The fundamental purposes behind improper utilization were the doctor's facility association and an over-wary doctor in the admission of a patient and referral to the hospital's emergency room by doctors working outside the hospital. Patients presented during holidays demonstrated a high percentage, and improper admissions were higher for medical rather than surgical patients (P < 0.001) at presentation. Conclusion: Improper admission is high in the maternity and children's teaching hospital in Al-Diwaniya, most likely because of the generally free social insurance administrations, parental inclination for healing center care, simple access to clinic administrations, and deficient instruction about the condition of the case. Recommend the requirement for more communication amongst doctors' facilities and group-based administrations to lessen such impropriety and for proceeding with a training framework to characterize institutionalized rules.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.