Stylistic Configuration of Modern English Young Adult Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ry5h8s61Keywords:
Literary Style, Communicative Style, Young Adult Literature, Age, YouthAbstract
The article presents a literary study of modern young adult prose in English. Stylistic and interpretative text analysis shows that this group of literary works has its own distinctive style. This style is not opposed to classical belles-lettres. Actually, it has the same wide arsenal of devices and expressive means. At the same time, youngsters’ literary works are characterized by some youth colloquial communicative features typical for this group only. Literary stylistic devices themselves reflect specific features of youth language. These facts prove that it is necessary to single out young adult literature as a separate functional substyle as well as to provide precise parameters and linguistic characteristics that define it. Besides, the authors revealed the following categories of stylistic means and literary devices of youth literature: narrative techniques, specific lexical stylistic devices, carnivalization of values, and emblems and symbols of youth culture. For this purpose, the authors chose and analyzed three popular youth novels that have been published recently. The analysis showed that dominant narrative techniques include interior monologues, first- and second-person points of view in the text, familiarity of the author with the audience, short communicative distance, and special lexical stylistic devices such as slang epithets, slang metaphors, etc. Carnivalization of values is not restricted to certain language means. It involves youth humor, sometimes rather violent and unexpected. This feature usually radically changes the understanding of common traditional values in the society. Emblems and symbols include words that denote concepts of modern youth life. The age of the author, audience, and characters is also considered a special factor that influences the stylistic characteristics of a literary work. The results of the research can be of great use for the development of literary theory, stylistics, and text analysis.
Downloads
References
[1] AKERS, T. (2011). The Legitimacy of Children’s and Young Literature as Literature. Thesis. Mankato: Minnesota State University. ISSN 1923-3299.
[2] ARNOLD, I.V. (1981). Stylistics of Modern English (Stylistics of Decoding). Leningrad: Prosveschenie.
Stilistika sovremennogo angliyskogo yazika (stilistika dekodirovaniya). Leningrad: Prosveschenie.
[3] BEKZHANOVA, Zh.E. (2016). Functional and pragmatic features of the youth discourse (on the material)
of English, Kazakh, and Russian languages). PhD Thesis. Almaty. Funktsional’no-pragmaticheskie
osobennosti molodezhnogo diskursa (na materiale angliyskogo, kazakhskogo i russkogo yazikov). PhD
dissertation. Almaty.
[4] BEKZHANOVA, Zh.E. (2017). Youth discourse: its essence, functions, and formats. Moscow: Flinta
Nauka. Molodezhniy diskurs: suschnost’, funktsii, formati. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka.
[5] BUCHOLTZ, M. (2013). Youth and Cultural Practice. In: Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 525-552.
ISSN 0084-6570.
[6] ECKERT, P. 2003. Language and adolescent peer groups. In: Journal of language and social psychology,
22, (1), 112-118.
[7] ESKRIDGE, E.M. 2002. Teachers Taking the Aesthetic Stance while Practicing Discussion of Young Adult Literature. Dissertation. Oklahoma.
[8] GALPERIN, I.R. (1981). English Stylistics. Moscow: Visshaya shkola. ISBN 5-7695-2969-5.
[9] GALPERIN, I.R. (1956). About the term "slang." In: Topics in the Study of Language. Moscow: Akademiya nauk SSSR, 6, 107-114. O termine "Sleng". In: Voprosi yazikoznaniya. Moscow: Akademiya nauk SSSR, n. 6, pp. 107-114.
[10] GOODSON, A.A. (2004). Protagonists of Young Adult Literature and Their Reflection on Society. Kansas.
[11] GROMOV, D.V. (2009). Slang of youth subcultures: lexical structure and formation features. In: Russian
in Scientific Coverage, 17, 228-240. Sleng molodezhnih subkul’tur: leksicheskaya struktura I osobennosti
formirovaniya. In: Russkiy yazik v nauchnom osveschenii, n. 17, pp. 228-240.
[12] JACOBS, S.L. (2003). Artistic Response to Incarcerated Male Youth to Young Adult Literature.
Dissertation. Kansas.
[13] KULIKOVA, L. (2006). Communicative style in the intercultural paradigm. Krasnoyarsk. Kommunikativniy stil’ v mezhkul’turnoi paradigme. Krasnoyarsk. ISBN 5-85981-114-4.
[14] STENSTRÖM, A.B., ANDERSEN, G., HASUND, I.K. (1996). Trends in Teenage Talk. Corpus Compilation, Analysis, and Findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 9789027297334.
[15] WAGG, H. (2004). Producing (In)Visible Girls: The Politics of Production in Young Adult Fiction with Adolescent Lesbian Characters. Concordia.
[16] YASSAKOVA, Y.B. (2005). Guide to Text Interpretation. Naberezhnye Chelny.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
