Remote Education in Modern University: Potential Opportunities, Quality or Availability?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/13vaa480Keywords:
distance education, educational technologies,, educational servicesAbstract
The relevance of this article is the need to study the development of a single information space of educational industries, the role of information and social technologies in higher professional education. It is not new for modernity, characterized by mass Informatization, digitalization and computerization, that information and communication technologies develop various spheres of human activity, including in the educational sphere. Leading universities in the world are actively using new technologies, and distance education in particular, to increase their share in the market of educational services. The purpose of the study is to identify the attitude of the teaching staff to remote educational services. Research methods: to study the attitude to distance education, we used a survey method that allows us to more thoroughly analyze the interest of the teaching staff in implementing appropriate technical support and innovative ways of presenting material. Results of the research: the article considers the readiness of the teaching staff to participate in distance learning, including as students. The experience of developing distance education courses by teachers is analyzed. It is shown that the vast majority of teachers are ready for this kind of activity. It is revealed that more than half of young teachers are the initiators of creating distance education courses, but they need to stimulate work and psychological support. It is determined that among the problems faced by teachers when developing their own distance education courses, the following were named: the lack of visual contact with students who are attendants of the courses; the difficulty of communicating only with a video camera; the lack of appropriate technical equipment. It is revealed that the University management is more interested in introducing innovative ways of presenting educational material than teachers, since this affects the status of the institution and, as a result, attracts a greater number of potential students. The authors analyze the factors that limit the readiness to create distance courses, among the most significant they identified lack of motivation and lack of time; lack of methods and material remuneration that compensates for time and intellectual costs. It is determined that social networks are rarely used for training (there
is no need, no time, and no confidence in the protection of information). It is shown that the vast majority of teachers believe that distance learning has good prospects, but only if traditional education is maintained and used in a comprehensive manner, which will compensate for the shortcomings of the first and expand the opportunities of the second.
Downloads
References
1. Andreev, A.A. (2002). Fundamentals of open education. Moscow: publishing house of Research and engineering center of RAO.
2. Bąk, T., Kardis, M., Valco, M., Kalimullin, A.M., and Galushkin, A.A (2019). A philosophical-sociological diagnosis of youth subcultures in the context of social changes. XLinguae, 12(2), 163-185.
3. Bebnev, A.E. (2013). Mass Online courses as a new innovative trend in the educational sphere. Modern problems of science and education, 6, 508-518.
4. Dinesh kumar S, Veeramani R. "HARVESTING MICROWAVE SIGNAL POWER FROM THE AMBIENT
ENVIRONMENT." International Journal of Communication and Computer Technologies 4 (2016), 76-
81. doi:10.31838/ijccts/04.02.04
5. Bobrova, L.V. Zinger, N. & Zinger, V. (2013). Problems of organizing group interactive training for a remote audience. Almanac of modern science and education, 2(69), 36-38.
6. Bochkov, V.E., Isaev, S.N. &Khitskov, E.A. (2014). Strengthening global competition for human resources: mass open online courses in the modern education system. Bulletin of the Kazan state Energy University, 22, 58-65.
7. Ibraheem, Hiba, Yasmeen Al-Majedy, and Ahmed Al-Amiery. "4-Thiadiazole: The Biological Activities." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 9.1 (2018), 36-40. Print. doi:10.5530/srp.2018.1.7
8. Davoudi SMM, Fartash K, Venera G. Zakirova, Asiya M. Belyalova, Rashad A. Kurbanov, Anna V. Boiarchuk, Zhanna M. Sizova (2018). Testing the Mediating Role of Open Innovation on the Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights and Organizational Performance: A Case of Science and Technology Park, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1359-1369.
9. Dmitrieva, Yu.A. (2007). Research on the accessibility of higher education in the sociology of education. Almanac of modern science and education, 1(1), 82-83.
10. Dmitrievskaya, N.A. (2014). Mass open Online courses as a tool for improving the effectiveness of education by ensuring compliance with promising trends in socio-economic development. New look. International scientific Bulletin, 6, 134-147.
11. Bhausaheb b. Jankar, devesh d. Gosavi (2017) adverse drug reaction of lithium carbonate-a review. Journal of Critical Reviews, 4 (1), 1-6. doi:10.22159/jcr.2017v4i1.14555
12. Drovosekov, S.E. &Sakhieva, R.G. (2018). Peculiarities of Using Projects in Learning English as a Foreign Language. XLinguae, 11(1), 91-101.
13. Khanmurzina, R.R., Cherdymova, E.I., Guryanova, T.Yu., Toriia, R.A., Sukhodolova, E.M. &Tararina, L.I. (2020). Computer Games Influence on Everyday Social Practices of Students-Gamers. Contemporary educational technology, 11(1), 11-19.
14. Klyachko, T.L. (2009). Forecast of higher education development in Russia. Moscow: MAX Press publishing house.
15. Kolganov, E.A. (2005). Implementation of new approaches in training. Compilation of scientific proceedings. Ufa: EESU.
16. Kovrigina, V.A. & Markova, N.I. (2014). Prospects for the development of online learning in the Russian educational space. Modern higher education: an innovative aspect, 3, 68-74.
17. Kuprina, T.V. (2015). Educational migration and didactic online technologies. Foreign languages and literature in the international educational space: collection of materials of the fifth international scientific and practical conference. Yekaterinburg: publishing house of Educational and methodical center of UPI.
18. Lapina, T.A. (2009). Methodological approaches to the analysis of educational services market (on the example of educational institutions of higher professional education). Bulletin of Omsk University. Economy Series, 4, 12-27.
19. Lukashenko, M.A. (2002). Education in the market: the concept of an educational institution. Moscow: Higher School publishing house.
20. Masalimova, A.R., Levina, E.Y., Platonova, R.I., Yakubenko, K.Yu., Mamitova, N.V., Arzumanova, L.L., Grebennikov, V.V. & Marchuk, N.N. (2017). Cognitive Simulation as Integrated Innovative Technology in
Teaching of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4915-4928.
21. Narutto, S.V., Cherdymova, E.I., Sokolova, E.D., Savostyanova, S.A., Stolyarova, A.N., Vilskaya, N.V. , Konovalova, I.A. & Smirnova, E.A. (2019). First-Year Student Attitude to Social Networks. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology, 8(2), 273-276.
22. Nosulenko, A.V. (2005). Classification of information systems and their application in the field of distance learning automation. Remote and virtual training, 2, 32-35.
23. Olkhovaya, T.A., Merculova, L.V., Cherdymova, E.I., Sukhodolova, E.M., Manakova, O.S., Laptev, A.A. & Popova, O.V. (2019). Description of the Development in Students' Communicative Abilities. International journal of applied exercise physiology, 8, 501-510.
24. Omarova, L.B., Kalimullin, A.M., Grudtsina, L.Y., Korzhuev, A.V., Zhukova, M.Y. (2018). Philosophical anthropology in postmodernism. XLinguae,11(3), 76-85.
25. Polat, E.S. (2005). on the problem of determining the effectiveness of distance learning. Remote and virtual training, 10, 43-44.
26. Polat, E.S., Moiseeva, M.V. & Petrov, A.E. (2006). Pedagogical technologies of distance learning. Moscow: Akademiya publishing house.
27. Pushkarev, V.V., Cherdymova, E.I., Prokopyev, A.I., Kochurov, M.G., Shamanin, N.V., Ezhov, S.G., Kamenskaya, S.V. &Kargina, N.V. (2019). Motivation and needs in the area of the spouses with different experiences of cohabitation. Dilemascontemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores.
28. Rozhina, V.A. &Baklashova, T.A. (2018). Teaching English language to young school-age children while making projects, playing games and using robotics. XLinguae, 11(1), 102-113.
29. Rysakova, P.I. (2015). Status of theoretical knowledge in modern education: new approaches in modern sociology of education. Proceedings of the St. Petersburg state Institute of culture, 208, 289-297.
30. Shabanov, A.G. (2009). Distance learning in continuous education: problems and prospects of development. Innovations in education, 10, 51-53.
31. Shakhmaev, N.M. (2000). Technical means of distance learning. Moscow: Znanie publishing house.
32. Shen, P., Gromova, C.R., Zakirova, V.G. &Yalalov, F.G. (2017). Educational Technology as a Video Cases in Teaching Psychology for Future Teachers. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3417-3429.
33. Slikishina, I.V. (2012). Distance education-the beginning of the path. Information and communication technologies in pedagogical education, 4(19), 7-9.
34. Soldatkin, V.I. (2003). Open distance learning: realization of the right to education. Development of new technologies in the education system of the Russian Federation: Proceedings of I international scien. - pract. conf., Moscow, pp. 20-23.
35. Sorokina, N.D. (2009). Introduction of distance education in higher education school. Sociology of education. Moscow: publishing house of SSU.
36. Taştan, S.B., Davoudi, S.M.M., Masalimova, A.R., Bersanov, A.S., Kurbanov, R.A., Boiarchuk, A.V., Pavlushin, A.A.(2018). The Impacts of Teacher’s Efficacy and Motivation on Student’s Academic Achievement in Science Education among Secondary and High School Students, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2353-2366.
37. Tikhonov, A.N. (1998). Management of modern education-social and economic aspects. Moscow: Vita-Press publishing house.
38. Varlamova, A.I. (2009). Comparative analysis of approaches to assessing the quality of higher education in Russia and abroad. Bulletin of the Moscow state regional University. Series: Pedagogy, 3, 13-16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
