Where Beta Going - Case in Viet Nam Commercial Electric Industry During Post-Low Inflation Period 2015-2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/b3907p52Keywords:
Risk Management, Asset Beta, Financial Crisis, Commercial Electric Industry, PolicyAbstract
The Vietnamese economy and commercial electric industry have gained lots of achievements after the financial crisis of 2007-2011, until they reached a low inflation rate of 0.6% in 2015. Software companies face challenges in expanding the Vietnam market, such as pricing policy and supporting services, etc. This paper measures the volatility of market risk in the Vietnamese electric industry after this period (2015-2017). The main reason is the vital role of the software company group in Vietnam in the economic development and growth in recent years, which always goes with risk potential and risk control policies. This research paper aims to figure out how much increase or decrease in the market risk of Vietnamese commercial electric firms during the post-low inflation period of 2015-2017. First, by using a quantitative combined with a comparative data analysis method, we find out the risk level measured by equity beta mean in the commercial electric industry is acceptable, i.e., it is a little lower than (<) 1. Then, one of its major findings is the comparison between the risk level of the electric industry during the financial crisis of 2007-2009 compared to those in the post-low inflation time of 2015-2017. In fact, the research findings show us market risk fluctuation, measured by asset and equity beta var, during the post-low inflation time has decreased slightly. Finally, this paper provides some ideas that could provide companies and governments more evidence in establishing their policies in governance. This is a complex task, but the research results show us a warning that the market risk volatility might be higher during the post-low inflation period of 2015-2017. And our conclusion part will recommend some policies and plans to deal with it. Finding new potential markets and credit and financing policies are among directions for electric companies.
Downloads
References
[1] Allen, F., and Gale, D. (1992). Stock Price Manipulation, Review of Financial Studies.
[2] Basu, Devraj, and Streme, Alexander. (2007). CAPM and Time-Varying Beta: The Cross-Section of Expected Returns, SSRN Working paper series
[3] Chatterjea, Arkadev, Jerian, Joseph A., and Jarrow, Robert A. (2001). Market Manipulation and Corporate Finance: A New Perspective, 1994 Annual Meeting Review, Southwestern Finance Association, Texas, USA.
[4] Chen RR, Chidambaran NK, Imerman MB, Sopranzetti BJ, Liquidity, Leverage, and Lehman: A Structural
Analysis of Financial Institutions in Crisis, Fordham School of Business Research Paper No. 2279686,
2013.
[5] Cheng, L.Y., Wang, M.C., and Chen, K.C. (2014). Institutional Investment Horizons and the Stock
Performance of Private Equity Placements: Evidence from the Taiwanese Listed Firms, Review of Pacific
Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 17(2).
[6] DeGennaro, Ramon P., Kim, Sangphill. (2003). The CAPM and Beta in an Imperfect Market, SSRN Working
paper series
[7] Dimitrov V, Jain PC. (2006). The Value Relevance of Changes in Financial Leverage, SSRN Working Paper
[8] Emilios, A. (2015). Bank Leverage Ratios and Financial Stability: A Micro- and Macroprudential Perspective,
Working Paper No. 849, Levy Economics Institute
[9] Eugene FF, French KR. (2004). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Economic
Perspectives.
[10] Galagedera, D.U.A. (2007). An alternative perspective on the relationship between downside beta and CAPM
beta, Emerging Markets Review
[11] Gunarathna, V. (2016). How Does Financial Leverage Affect Financial Risk? An Empirical Study in Sri
Lanka, Amity Journal of Finance, 1(1), 57-66.
[12] Gunaratha V. (2013). The Degree of Financial Leverage as a Determinant of Financial Risk: An Empirical
Study of Colombo Stock Exchange in Sri Lanka, 2nd International Conference on Management and
Economics Paper.
[13] Khwaja, Asim Ijaz, and Mian, Atif. (2005). Unchecked intermediaries: Price manipulation in an emerging
stock market, Journal of Financial Economics 78, 243–241
[14] Li, L., and Pornchai, C. (2014). Income Structure, Competitiveness, Profitability, and Risk: Evidence from
Asian Banks, Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 17(3).
[15] Martin, K., and Sweder, V.W. (2012). On Risk, leverage and banks: Do highly leveraged banks take on
Excessive Risk? , Discussion Paper TI 12-022/2/DSF31, Tinbergen Institute
[16] Park, J.C., Ali, F.D., & Mbanga, C. (2019). Investor sentiment and aggregate stock returns: the role of investor attention, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 53(2), 397-428.
[17] Rahman, Dima. (2013). Are Banking Systems Increasingly Fragile? Investigating Financial Institutions’ CDS Return Extreme Co-Movements, Quantitative Finance
[18] Siller, Thomas. (2013). Measuring Marginal Risk Contributions in Credit Portfolios, Quantitative Finance
[19] Umar. (2011). Profits, Financial Leverage and Corporate Governance, SSRN Working Paper
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.