Assessment of students learning capability adapting activity based learning – STAD

Authors

  • Bridjeshpappula Department of Mechanical Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/c1wcx816

Keywords:

Activity based learning;, STAD; Inclivity;, Teaching Methodology.

Abstract

Current educational approaches within higher education utilize blended learning. Students receive a combination of traditional face to face instruction in class and are also required to complete activities outside of the class, facilitated through a range of technological resources. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of activity based learning. Blended learning has become increasingly popular in higher education globally, forming the cornerstone of curriculum design and providing opportunity for learning not previously possible or available to students. The results indicate that there is much indirect evidence emerging of improved academic performance and student and staff satisfaction with the STAD approach but a paucity of conclusive evidence that it contributes to building lifelong learning. It can be concluded from this study that activity based learning not only fosters the self learning of a learner but also allows the learner to learn according to one’s own skill and aptitude.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Rebich S, Gauthier C. Concept mapping to revealprior knowledge and conceptual change in a mocksummit course on global climate change. Journal of Geo Science Education. 53 (4), (2005) 355–365.

2. Raines C. Connecting generations: The sourcebook for a new workplace. Menlo Park CA Crisp Publications, (2002).

3. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How people learn: Brain mindexperience and school. National AcademyPress: Washington DC, (1999).

4. Spence LD. The case againstteaching. Change, 33 (6), (2001) 11–19.

5. Tigner RB. Putting memory research to good use: Hintsfrom cognitive psychology. College Teaching, 47 (4), (1999) 149–152.

6. Vega, J. L. A., &Marentes, F. R. Perception Regarding The Students Experience, Learning Activities and Researchat Universidad Autónoma De Baja California Sur.

7. Stage FK, Kinzie J, Muller P, Simmons A. Creatinglearningcenteredclassrooms: What does learning theory have to say. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education: Washington DC, (1999).

8. Feldmann LJ. Classroom civilityisanother of ourinstructorresponsibilities. College Teaching, 49 (4), (2001)

137–141.

9. Ruhela, R. Brain based Learning: Enriching Future Generation.

10. Bligh DA. What’s the use of lectures?.Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, (2000).

11. Biktimirov EN, Nilson LB. Adding animation and interactivity to finance courses with learning objects. Journal of Financial Education, 33, (2007) 35–47.

12. Lalitha, S. Magnitude of Interaction and Collaboration in Teaching and Learning.

13. Leamnson R. Learning as biologicalbrain change. Change, 32 (6), (2000) 34–40.

14. Elsayed, A. M., Shehata, Y. A., &Badawy, O. M. Comparing the Effect of Simulation based Learning Versus On-Scene Learning in Self-Efficacy on Marine Cadets.

15. Boice R. Advice for new facultymembers: Nihil nimus. Allyn &Bacon:NeedhamHeights MA, (2000).

16. Royce AP. A survey of academic incivility at Indiana University: Preliminary report. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Survey Research, (2000).

17. Kheirabadi, S. Educational Uses of the Digital Devices for Learning Human’sSkills.

18. Kristensen E. Teaching at the University of Ottawa: A handbook for professors and TAs”, 5th edn ON: University of Ottawa, Centre for University Teaching: Ottawa, (2007).

19. Ua-Umakul, A. N. O. N., &Chaiwatchatuphon, O. The Effects of using Stem Project-based Learning Activities on Environmental Problem-Solving Ability of Upper Secondary SchoolStudents in Bangkok Metropolis.

20. Hall E, Mosley D. Is there a role for learning styles in personalizededucation and training. International Journal of Lifelong Learning, 24 (3), (2005) 243–255.

21. P. K. Lakshmi, B. Kalpana, D. Prasanthi. "Invasomes-novel Vesicular Carriers for Enhanced Skin Permeation." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 4.1 (2013), 26-30.

22. Keerthika, V., & Dr. Sapna, P.G. (2016). Regression Testing-Literature Survey and Identification of Problems for Future Research. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology, 8(4), 351-363.

23. Parvez, S.J. (2018). A Study on Geographical Search and Road Network Using Progressive Indicator for Finding Shortest Path. Journal of Computational Information Systems,14(6), 149 - 152.

24. Kuthsiyat Jahan, S., Chandru, K., Dhanapriyan, B., Kishore Kumar, R., Vinothraj, G. SEPIC Converter based Water Driven Pumping System by Using BLDC Motor (2017) Bonfring International Journal of Power Systems and Integrated Circuits, 7 (1), pp. 7-12.

25. Khan, A., Khushnood, S. Simple and Efficient Blood Glucose Measurement Technique Using Non Invasive Artificial Intelligence (2017) Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 7 (1), p. 9.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Bridjeshpappula. (2020). Assessment of students learning capability adapting activity based learning – STAD. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 2982-2988. https://doi.org/10.61841/c1wcx816