A Corpus Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers Used in Argumentative Essays by Pakistani Undergraduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/xy6nx272Keywords:
argumentative writing, corpus, discourse devices, , metadiscourse.Abstract
Metadiscourse is considered as one of the significant rhetorical features and strategies in the production of any piece of written or spoken discourse. It establishes a relationship of the writer with the audience in any communication process. The present study aimed at determining the frequency distribution of metadiscourse markers in argumentative essays of undergraduate students in a private sector university. This quantitative study adopted Hyland’s (2005) Interpersonal model of Metadiscourse.A corpus based software AntConc 3.5.7 was applied for a total of 124 argumentative essays. Finding of the study showed that the frequency of interactive metadiscourse markers was higher than interactional markers. It has also been observed that the most frequently used markers were transition markers whereas endophoric markers were used with less frequency. The results of the study have a few pedagogical implications. It highlights the importance of metadiscourse devices in learning and teaching writing skills in English Language Teaching (ELT) context and help to understand the norm of discourse markers. Moreover, metadiscourse analysis would benefit English language teachers to develop the writing skills of learners with appropriate use of metadiscourse devices.
Downloads
References
1. Anwardeen, N. H., Luyee, E. O., Gabriel, J. I., &Kalajahi, S. A. R. (2013). An Analysis: The Usage of Metadiscourse in Argumentative Writing by Malaysian Tertiary Level of Students. English Language Teaching, 6(9), 83-96.
2. Asghar, J. (2015). Metadiscourse and Contrastive Rhetoric in Academic Writing: Evaluation of a small academic corpus. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 317-
326.http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0602.11
3. Bal-Gezegina, B. (2016). A Corpus-based Investigation of Metadiscourse in Academic Book. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 713-718.
4. Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in Ph. D theses. English for specific purposes, 18, S41- S56.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2
5. Carretero, M. (2016). Cutting, J.(2015). Pragmatics: A resource book for students. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.29.2.10car
6. Chambliss, M. J., & Garner, R. (1996). Do adults change their minds after reading persuasive text?. Written Communication, 13(3), 291-313.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088396013003001
7. Cheng, X., &Steffensen, M. S. (1996). Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 149-181.
8. Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act (Vol. 17). Peter Lang Pub Incorporated.
9. Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse, 118-136.
10. Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., &Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written communication, 10(1), 39-
71.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088393010001002
11. Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
12. Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 185-235.
13. Harris, S. A. (1958). Differentiation of various Egyptian aeolian microenvironments by mechanical composition. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 28(2), 164-174.https://doi.org/10.1306/74D70790-2B21- 11D7-8648000102C1865D
14. Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written communication, 13(2), 251-281.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088396013002004
15. Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 35(2), 224-244.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002194369803500203
16. Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductorycoursebooks. English for specific purposes, 18(1), 3-26.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00025-2
17. Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for specific purposes, 20(3), 207-226.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
18. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of second language writing, 13(2), 133-151.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
19. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing London. England: Continuum.
20. Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 125-143.
21. Hyland, K., &Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
22. Intaraprawat, P., &Steffensen, M. S. (1995). The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays. Journal of second language writing, 4(3), 253-272.https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90012-8
23. Kan, M. O. (2016). The use of interactional metadiscourse: a comparison of articles on Turkish education and literature.
24. Kopple, W. J. V. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College composition and communication, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.2307/357609
25. Kumpf, E. P. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical communication quarterly, 9(4), 401-424.https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250009364707
26. Lu, L. (2011). Metadiscourse and genre learning: English argumentative writing by Chinese undergraduates (Unpublished Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.http://dx.doi.org/10.5353/th_b4599670
27. Mohamed, A. F., & Rashid, R. A. (2017). The metadiscourse markers in good undergraduate writers’ essays corpus. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(6), 213-220.https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n6p213
28. Moreno, A. I. (1997). Genre constraints across languages: Causal metatext in Spanish and English RAs. English for specific purposes, 16(3), 161-179.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00023-3
29. Mostafavi, M., &Tajalli, G. (2012). Metadiscoursal Markers in Medical and Literary Texts. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(3), 64.https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n3p64
30. Mu, C., Zhang, L. J., Ehrich, J., & Hong, H. (2015). The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 135-
148.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
31. Ozdemir, N. O., & Longo, B. (2014). Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 59-63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.011
32. Smith, V., Florence, K., & Maria, F. (2018). Semantics in cultural perspective overview. Linguistics and Culture Review, 2(1), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v2n1.9
33. Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2016). An analysis of meta-discourse in the abstracts of English academic papers. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: Linguistics and Education, 16(9).
34. Williams, E. (1981). On the notions" Lexically related" and" Head of a word". Linguistic inquiry, 12(2), 245-274.
35. Woodlove, G. M., &Vurly, M. E. (2017). Political discourse approach applied the current study issue occurred. Linguistics and Culture Review, 1(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v1n1.3
36. Zhang, M. (2016). A multidimensional analysis of metadiscourse markers across written registers. Discourse Studies, 18(2), 204-222.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461445615623907
37. Firas Hasan Bazzari. "Available Pharmacological Options and Symptomatic Treatments of Multiple Sclerosis." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 9.1 (2018), 17-21. Print. doi:10.5530/srp.2018.1.4
38. Van Wijk, R., Bosman, S., Ackerman, J., Van Wijk, E.P.A.Correlation between fluctuations in human ultra- weak photon emission and EEG alpha rhythm (2008) NeuroQuantology, 6 (4), pp. 452-463.
39. Tamulis, A.Quantum mechanical control of artificial minimal living cells (2008) NeuroQuantology, 6 (3),
pp. 311-322.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
