Framing the Household Sustainable Consumption and Lifestyle in Malaysia: The Policy Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/vxgrbh69Keywords:
Household, Sustainable Lifestyle, Sustainable Consumption, Consumer, BehaviourAbstract
Given the plethora of choices and the abundance of products available in the market, household roles in practicing sustainable consumption and lifestyle in their daily life are crucial. As a newly industrialized country, Malaysian consumers are experiencing high consumerism spirits due to strong purchasing power. Hence, reorienting the complexities of consumption patterns towards sustainability requires defragmentation, prioritization, and gradually changing to find more practical and strategic actions to overcome the barriers and policy intervention. Thus, this study aims to explore and analyze to what extend the sustainable consumption and lifestyle are being practices, ii. What are the barriers to foster the gradual changes to performs such behavior and iii.how the complexities of consumption structure to create the conducive environmental for behavioral changes towards sustainable behaviour. The study found the contextual factors of availability of green products and barriers that need to be overcome to develop the household sustainable lifestyle. Most of the household sustainable lifestyle practices and purchases are driven by economic rationalities rather than environmental reasons. The complexities of the interrelatedness of consumption are structured into an integrative framework of household sustainable lifestyle and consumption, which recognizes the contextual factors of sustainable purchases and barriers to strengthening sustainable behavior. From this study, four points of policy intervention levels are recognized to overcome the barriers in performing sustainable lifestyles and consumption. The four are product innovation, technical innovation, governance approaches, and knowledge, awareness, and advocacy. Various policy instruments related to sustainable lifestyle and consumption are proposed by considering the contextual factor of sustainable consumption and lifestyle in Malaysia.
Downloads
References
[1] Adham, Khairul Naim, and Chamhuri Siwar. 2012. “Empirical Investigation of Government Green
Procurement (GGP) Practices in Malaysia.” International Journal of Sustainable Development 4(4): 77–88.
[2] Ajzen, Icek. 2011. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Reactions and Reflections.” Psychology & Health
26(9): 1113–27.
[3] Al-Swidi, Abdullah, Sheikh Mohammed Rafiul Huque, Muhammad Haroon Hafeez, and Mohd Noor Mohd
Shariff. 2014. “The Role of Subjective Norms in Theory of Planned Behavior in the Context of Organic
Food Consumption.” British Food Journal 116(10): 1561–80.
[4] Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf (1994). The Lawful and Prohibited in Islam (Al-Halal Wal Haram Fil Islam).
Plainfield: American Trust Publication.
[5] Banbury, Catherine, Robert Stinerock, and Saroja Subrahmanyan. 2012. “Sustainable Consumption:
Introspecting across Multiple Lived Cultures.” Journal of Business Research 65(4): 497–503.
[6] Barr, Stewart, and Andrew Gilg. 2006. “Sustainable Lifestyles: Framing Environmental Action in and
around the home.” Geoforum 37(6): 906–20.
[7] Bauman, Zygmunt. 1992. “Survival as a Social Construct.” Theory, Culture & Society 9: 1–36.
[8] Biel, A. 2000. Factors promoting cooperation in the laboratory in common pool resource dilemmas and
large-scale dilemmas: similarities and differences. In : M. Van Vugt, M. Snyder, T.R. Tyler & A. Biel
(Eds.). Cooperation in modern society: Promoting the welfare of communities, states, and organizations, pp.
25-41. London: Routledge.
[9] Bilal, Muhammad Asim (2001). Kīmiyā-i-Saʻādat—An English Translation of Imam Ghazzali’s Alchemy
of Eternal Bliss (Abu Hamid Al-Ghazzali). KAZI PUBLICATIONS, Lahore-Pakistan.
[10] Burgess, Jacquelin et al. 2003. “(Un)sustainable Consumption.” In Negotiating Environmental Change: New
Perspectives from Social Science, eds. Melissa Leach and Ian Scoones. Edward Elgar Publishing, 261.
[11] Chaney, David C. 1996. Lifestyles. Routledge.
[12] Daugbjerg, Carsten., Sinne Smed, Laura Mørch Andersen & Yonatan Schvartzman (2014) Improving Ecolabelling as an Environmental Policy Instrument: Knowledge, Trust and Organic Consumption, Journal of
Environmental Policy & Planning, 16:4, 559-575.
[13] Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D.R., Paavola, J., Sari, I.M., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., Locatelli, B.,
Brockhaus, M. and Kusumadewi, S.D. (2017). 'Climate policy integration in the land use sector:
Mitigation, adaptation, and sustainable development linkages'. Environmental Science & Policy 67, 35-43.
[14] Dolan, Paddy. 2002. “The Sustainability of ‘Sustainable Consumption", Journal of Macromarketing 22(2):
170–81.
[15] Featherstone, Mike. 1987. Lifestyle and Consumer Culture. Theory, Culture & Society 4(1): 55–70.
[16] Frey, Bruno S., and Klaus Foppa. 1986. “Human Behavior: Possibilities Explain Action.” Journal of
Economic Psychology 7(2): 137–60.
[17] Gardner, Gerald T., and Paul C. Stern. 1996. Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Needham
Heights.
[18] Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford
University Press.
[19] Gilg, Andrew, Stewart Barr, and Nicholas Ford. 2005. “Green Consumption or Sustainable Lifestyles?
Identifying the Sustainable Consumer.” Futures 37(6): 481–504.
[20] Jackson, Tim. 2008. “Live Better by Consuming Less?: Is There a ‘Double Dividend’ in Sustainable
Consumption?” Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(1-2): 19–36.
[21] Jackson, Tim, and Laurie Michaelis. 2003. Policies for Sustainable Consumption A Report to the
Sustainable Development Commission Policies for Sustainable Consumption.
[22] Lafferty, William, and Eivind Hovden. 2003. “Environmental Policy Integration: Towards an Analytical
Framework.” Environmental Politics 12(3): 1–22.
[23] Lee, Sean Henry. 2005. “An Application of a Five-Stage Consumer Behavior Decision-Making Model:
An Exploratory Study of Chinese Purchasing of Imported Health Food.”
[24] Kast., S.W. & Tanner, W. 2003. Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Determinants of Green Purchases by
Swiss Consumers. Psychology and Marketing 20(10):883–902.
[25] Mainieri, Tina et al. 1997. “Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer
Behavior.” The Journal of Social Psychology 137(2): 189–204.
[26] Ministry of Domestic Affairs, Co-operatives, and Consumerism. 2003. Malaysia Consumer Master Plan.
Malaysia.
[27] Ministry of Green Technology, Energy, and Water. 2014. National Renewable Energy Policy and Action
Plan.
[28] Marchand, Anne, and Stuart Walker. 2008. “Product Development and Responsible Consumption:
Designing Alternatives for Sustainable Lifestyles.” Journal of Cleaner Production 16(11): 1163–69.
[29] McKenzie-Mohr, Doug. 2000. “New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Promoting Sustainable
Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing.” Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 543–
54.
[30] Meadowcroft, James. 2002. “Politics and Scale: Some Implications for Environmental Governance.”
Landscape and Urban Planning 61(2-4): 169–79.
[31] Miller, Daniel. 1995. “Consumption and Commodities.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24(1): 141–61.
[32] Musa, Abeer, Habib Ullah Khan, and Khaled A. AlShare. 2015. “Factors Influence Consumers’ Adoption
of Mobile Payment Devices in Qatar.” International Journal of Mobile Communications 13(6): 670.
[33] Myers, Norman., and Jennifer Kent. 2004. The New Consumers : The Influence of Affluence on the
Environment. Island Press.
[34] National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy. 2012. A Framework for Analyzing Public Policies:
Practical Guide.
[35] Ofstad, Sylvi., Liv. Westly, Tone. Bratelli, and Norway. Miljøverndepartementet. 1994. “Symposium:
Sustainable Consumption.” In Symposium on Sustainable Consumption, Oslo, Norway: Ministry of
Environment, 180.
[36] Ramli, Awang et al. 2014. “Halal Epistemology from a Global Perspective.” The Social Science 9(6): 375–
78.
[37] Richards, Cameron, and Irina Safitri Zen. 2016. “From Surface to Deep Corporate Social Responsibility.”
Journal of Global Responsibility 7(2): 275–87.
[38] Repetto, Robert. 2006. “Introduction.” In Punctuated Equilibrium and the Dynamics of U.S. Environmental
Policy, ed. R. Repetto. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1–23.
[39] Saari., U.A., Baumgartner, R.J. & Mäkinen., S.J. 2017. Eco-Friendly Brands to Drive Sustainability
Development: Replication and Extension of the Brand Experience Scale in a Cross-National Context.
Sustainability 9(1286).
[40] Sadalla, Edward K., and Jennifer L. Krull. 1995. “Self-Presentational Barriers to Resource Conservation.”
Environment and Behavior 27(3): 328–53.
[41] Stern, David I. 1997. “Limits to Substitution and Irreversibility in Production and Consumption: A
Neoclassical Interpretation of Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 21(3): 197–215.
[42] Tanner, Carmen, and Sybille Wölfing Kast. 2003. “Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Determinants of
Green Purchases by Swiss Consumers.” Psychology & Marketing 20(10): 883–902.
[43] Tey, Yeong Sheng et al. 2008. “A Complete Demand System of Food in Malaysia.” Journal of Agricultural
Economics 5(3): 17–29.
[44] Thøgersen, John. 2005. “How May Consumer Policy Empower Consumers for Sustainable Lifestyles?”
Journal of Consumer Policy 28(2): 143–77.
[45] Unal Ali (2008). The Qur’an. Annotated Interpretation in Modern English. 2008. New Jersey: The Light,
Inc.
[46] Khadiv-Jam, Hussin (2014). Kīmiyā-i-Saʻādat (Alchemy of Eternal Bliss) – A Persian Translation of Abu
Hamid Imam Muhammad Ghazzali Tusi. Tehran: Intesharat-e ‘Ilmi va Farhangi.
[47] Vringer, Kees, and Kornelis Blok. 2000. “Long-Term Trends in Direct and Indirect Household Energy
Intensities: A Factor in Dematerialization?” Energy Policy 28(10): 713–27.
[48] Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioral responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts.
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 13-23.
[49] Yanow, Dvora, and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. 2015. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research
Methods and the Interpretive Turn—Google Books. Routledge.
[50] Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., and Oates, C. J., 2010. Sustainable consumption: green consumer
behavior when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18(1), pp. 20-31.
[51] Zen, Irina Safitri, Ahamad, Rahmalan, & Omar, Wahid. 2013a. No Plastic Bag Campaign Day in Malaysia
and the policy implication. Environment, Development & Sustainability: 1-11. Springer
[52] Zen, Irina Safitri, Ahamad, Rahmalan. Rampal, Krihsna Gopal & Omar, Wahid. 2013b. Asbestos in
Malaysia: Legislative Measures, the Current Status and Recommendations for a Ban on Use. International
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 19 (3): 169-178.
[53] Zen, Irina Safitri, Noor, Zainura Zainon & Rafiu Olasunkanmi Yusuf. 2014. The Profile of Household
Recycler and Non-Recyclers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International 42:83-89.
[54] Zen, Irina Safitri, and Chamhuri Siwar. 2015. “An Analysis of Household Acceptance of Curbside
Recycling Scheme in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.” Habitat International 47: 248–55.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
