Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the University Readiness Survey

Authors

  • Muna Al-Kalbani PAM, SQU Author
  • Thuwayba Al Barwani PAM, SQU Author
  • Otherine Neisler PAM, SQU Author
  • Hussain Alkharusi PAM, SQU Author
  • David Clayton PAM, SQU Author
  • Humaira Al-Sulaimani PAM, SQU Author
  • Mohammad Khan PAM, SQU Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xv9x5n75

Keywords:

Word Validity, Reliability, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, URS, College Readiness, SQU

Abstract

This study describes the psychometric properties and factor structure of the University Readiness Survey (URS). Survey data were collected from a sample of 2652 students from Sultan Qaboos University. Exploratory factor analysis identified ten significant factors underlining the structure. The results of Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit to the data where the indices for the revised model were χ2 (df = 1669) = 6093.4; CFI = 0.900; GFI =0.926; PCLOSE = 1.00 and RMSAE = 0.030 where each of these indices were above threshold. The overall value of Cronbach’s alpha was 0.899 indicating that the instrument score was reliable. Results imply that the URS is a valid measure describing the college readiness pattern among Sultan Qaboos University students and the Arabic version could be used by university counsellors to identify students’ readiness factors. Nevertheless, further validation of the USR is recommended. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Al-Barwani, T.H., Yahya, A., & Ibrahim, A. (1997). Basic skills and attitudes for university study as perceived by faculty members at Sultan Qaboos University. Series of Educational and Psychological Studies, 2, 39-63.

[2] Conley, D.T. (2010). University and career ready: Helping all students succeed beyond high school. John Wiley & Sons.

[3] Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.

[4] Hair, J.F. Jr, Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

[5] Ibrahim, A., Yahya, A., & Al-Barwani, T. (1992). A Study of the Omani secondary school certificate

examination as a predictor of academic performance at Sultan Qaboos University. Series of educational and

Psychological Studies, 2.

[6] Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[7] Ministry of Education. (1994). The educational system in Oman: Achievements and challenges. Sultanate of

Oman: Author.

[8] Ministry of Education. (1995). Reform and development of general education in the Sultanate of Oman.

Sultanate of Oman: Author.

[9] Ministry of Education. (2007). Basic education: Aims, implementation and evaluation. Sultanate of Oman:

Author.

[10] Ministry of National Economy. (1995). 2020 vision for Oman’s economy; towards a better economic future.

Sultanate of Oman: Author.

[11] Yahya, A. (1997). Achievement motivation as a function of sex, age, and academic achievement of Sultan Qaboos University Students. Series of educational and Psychological Studies, 2, 1-15.

[12] Blunch, N. 2008. Introduction to structural equation modeling using SPSS and AMOS. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.

[13] Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

[14] Byrne, B.M. 2001. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nded. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.ces

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

Al-Kalbani, M., Al Barwani, T., Neisler, O., Alkharusi, H., Clayton, D., Al-Sulaimani, H., & Khan, M. (2020). Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the University Readiness Survey. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 01-08. https://doi.org/10.61841/xv9x5n75