COMPARISON OF MUSCLE ACTIVITIES BETWEEN BARBELL DEADLIFT AND JEFFERSON DEADLIFT

Authors

  • Byoung-Hyoun Moon Graduate student, Dept. of physical therapy, Nambu University 23 CheomdanJungang-ro, KS008, Republic of Korea Author
  • Young-Jin Lim Graduate student, Dept. of physical therapy, Nambu University 23 CheomdanJungang-ro, KS008, Republic of Korea Author
  • Ji-Won Kim Professor, Dept. of physical therapy, Nambu University 23 CheomdanJungang-ro, KS008, Republic of Korea Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/8ghxwb50

Keywords:

barbell deadlift, erector spinae, Jefferson deadlift, muscle activity, rectus femoris.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The purpose of this study is to identify changes in the muscle activity of the trunk and lower extremity during barbell deadlift and Jefferson deadlift.

Methods/Statistical analysis: 24 people (14 male and 10 female) were selected to measure the muscle activity of the erector spinae, gluteus maximus, rectus femoris and rectus abdominis. Paired t-test was conducted to determine the difference in muscle activity during barbell deadlift and jefferson deadlift. Statistical programs used SPSS Version 22.0 (Statistics Package for the Social Science).

Findings: There were significant differences in rectus femoris and elector spinae during barbell deadlift and jefferson deadlift. Rectus femoris showed higher muscle activity in jefferson deadlift than barbell deadlift in the ascending phase and deccending phase (P>.05). Erector spinae showed higher muscle activity barbell deadlift than jefferson deadlift in the all phase (P>.05).

Improvements/Applications: This study suggests that jefferson deadlift is effective to increase muscle activity of RF with decrease muscle activity of ES than barbell deadlift.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Med Sci Sports Exerc, 34, 682-688.

[25] Yoon, J. G. (2013). The correlation between the muscle activity and joint angle of the lower extremity according to the changes in stance width during a lifting task. Journal of physical therapy science, 25(8), 1023- 1025.

[26] Andersen, V., Fimland, M. S., Mo, D. A., Iversen, V. M., Vederhus, T., Hellebø, L. R. R.,.et al. (2018). Electromyographic Comparison of barbell Deadlift, Hex Bar Deadlift, and Hip Thrust Exercises: A Cross- Over Study. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 32(3), 587-593.

[27] Kang, M. H., Choi, S. H., & Oh, J. S. (2013). Postural taping applied to the low back influences kinematics and EMG activity during patient transfer in physical therapists with chronic low back pain. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 23(4), 787-793.

[28] Langevin, H. M., & Sherman, K. J. (2007). Pathophysiological model for chronic low back pain integrating connective tissue and nervous system mechanisms. Medical hypotheses, 68(1), 74-80.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2020

How to Cite

Moon, B.-H., Lim, Y.-J., & Kim, J.-W. (2020). COMPARISON OF MUSCLE ACTIVITIES BETWEEN BARBELL DEADLIFT AND JEFFERSON DEADLIFT. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(7), 1932-1941. https://doi.org/10.61841/8ghxwb50