Comparison of Shielding Capacity of Self-produced nano-size and micro-size molybdenum shielding sheet with diagnostic X-ray imaging system

Authors

  • Dae Ho Kim Researcher, Dept. of Radiology, Hanyang University Medical Center, 222-1, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea Author
  • Sang Hyun Kim Professor, Dept. of Radiogical Science, Shinhan University, Affiliation95, Hoam-ro, Uijeongbu-si, Gyeonggi-do, 11644, Republic of Korea Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/srxvb705

Keywords:

Lead, Shielding Material, Nano particle, Molybdenum, Transmissivity

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Lead is widely used as a material for shielding radiation. but lead is harmful and expensive to dispose of. shielding materials that can be used in place of lead are bismuth (Bi), tungsten (W) and molybdenum (Mo). as these materials become smaller in size, the surface area of the entire material increases dramatically, resulting in nano sized materials having different physical properties therefore, the purpose of this study is to use molybdenum, which is harmless to the human body as a material to replace lead, to produce shielding sheets according to particle size and to compare shielding capacity.

Methods/Statistical analysis: Nano-sized molybdenum and micro-sized molybdenum particle was analyzed using TEM equipment. molybdenum was used to fabricate micro and nano sized shielding sheets and to analyze the shielding performance according to energy band. shielding ability of the nano-sized molybdenum shielding sheet and the micro-sized molybdenum shielding sheet was compared according to the kV range. the low energy range was set from 41kV to 70kV, and 5 times were measured in the range of 41-50, 51-60, 61-70 with increasing kV by 1. the Middle Energy Range was set from 71kV to 100kV, and the measurement was repeated five times in the range of 71-80, 81 -90, 91-100 with increasing kV by 1

Findings: In the low-energy area (41-70kV), micro-shields had 81% higher transmittance than nano shielding. In the middle energy area (71-100kV), micro shielding had an 18% higher transmission rate than nano shielding. In high-energy areas (101-140kV), the transmittance rate of micro and nano shielding was the same. Improvements/Applications: As a result of comparing the shielding ability of the molybdenum of the micro particle size and the nano particle size, the shielding ability of the nano particle size molybdenum sheet showed better shielding ability in the low energy region.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003Nov;100(24):761-66.

[2] D. H. Kim, S. H. Kim, Y. J. Lee et al. Study on Exposure Dose and Image Quality of Operator Using Shielding Material in Neuro Interventional Radiology. The Korea Society of Radiology. 2017Dec; 11(7): 377-383.

[3] K. H. Chang, W. H. Lee, D. M. Choo et al. Dose Reduction in CT using bismuth Shielding : Measurements and monte carlo simulations, Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2010Mar; 138(4):382–388.

[4] J. H. Cho, M. S. Kim, J. D. Rhim. Comparison of radiation shielding ratios of nano sized bismuth trioxide and molybdenum, Radiation Effects & Defects in Solids. 2015Jun;170(7):651–658.

[5] Ravi Sharma, D.P. Bisen, Usha Shukla. X-ray diffraction: a powerful method of characterizing nanomaterials,

Recent Research in Science and Technology. 2012 Oct;4(8):77-79.

[6] J. W. Hong, D. H. Kim, S. W. Kim et al. Effectiveness evaluation of self-produced micro- and nanosized tungsten materials for radiation shielding with diagnostic X-ray imaging system, Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 2018Jul; 172: 760–765.

[7] Kim, S. C. et al. Physical analysis of the shielding capacity for a lightweight apron designed for shielding low intensity scattering X-rays. Sci. Rep. 2016Nov; 6:27721.

[8] Udmale V, Mishra D, Gadhave R, Pinjare D, Yamgar R. Development trends in Conductive Nano-Composites for Radiation Shielding. Orient J Chem. 2013Oct;29(3): 927-936

[9] N.Z. NoorAzman et al. Characterisation of micro-sized and nano-sized tungsten oxide-epoxy composites for radiation shielding of diagnostic X-rays, Materials Science and Engineering C 33. 2013Dec;33(8):4952–4957.

[10] N.Z. Noor Azman et al. Effect of particle size, filler loadings and x-ray tube voltage on the transmitted x-ray transmission in tungsten. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2013Jan;71(1):62-7.

[11] J. W. Kim, D. B. Seo, B. C. Lee, et al. Nano-W Dispersed Gamma Radiation Shielding Materials, Advanced_Engineering_Materials. 2014Sep;16(9):1083-1089.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2020

How to Cite

Kim, D. H., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Comparison of Shielding Capacity of Self-produced nano-size and micro-size molybdenum shielding sheet with diagnostic X-ray imaging system. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(7), 1888-1895. https://doi.org/10.61841/srxvb705