IDENTITY THEFT IN RELATION TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/5aaap733Keywords:
Identity theft, Internet, Crime, Prevention, Cyber HackingAbstract
As we are in the fast growing world of technologies, we have to attune ourselves to the new changes and also should be aware about its complications. Identity theft simply means use of someone else’s identity in a deliberate manner, to obtain financial benefits in the name of another or to attain him losses. Identity theft has been regarded as the top of the list of complaints by consumers nationwide to the Federal Trade Commission(FTC). One has to protect his identity as your personal information is always at risk due to the internet and complexion of technology. Some of the most common ways in which your data can be up held by someone are dark web, malware activity, credit card frauds etc. The threats have to be mitigated more effectively and efficiently as it may have disastrous impacts. There should be resilience. The aim of the research paper is to know about identity theft and its impact on public confidence. The type of research used is descriptive research and convenient sampling method is used as sampling method. The sample size is 1378. The independent variable is gender. The dependent variables are whether identity theft is a modern crime And whether identity theft prevention in the post internet era has been increased. The statistics used are independent samples t test and chi square. The study’s findings have revealed that there is a significant increase in identity theft prevention in the post internet era.
Downloads
References
1. Ahmed, Syed R. 2020. “Preventing Identity Crime: Identity Theft and Identity Fraud.” https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004395978.
2. Arata, Michael J., and Jr. 2010. Identity Theft For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
3. Breaux, Mike. 2011. Identity Theft: Reclaiming Who God Created You to Be. Zondervan.
4. Camp, L. Jean, and L. Jean Camp. n.d. “Identity Theft.” Economics of Identity Theft: Avoidance, Causes and Possible Cures. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68614-1_3.
5. Camp, L. Jean, L. Jean Camp, and M. Eric Johnson. 2012. “Identity Theft in Healthcare.” The Economics of Financial and Medical Identity Theft. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1- 4614-1918-1_7.
6. Camp, L. Jean, L. Jean Camp, M. Eric Johnson, and Ari Schwartz. 2012. “Scenario IV: Ubiquitous Identity Theft.” The Economics of Financial and Medical Identity Theft. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1918-1_11.
7. Cantor, Ron. 2013. Identity Theft. Destiny Image Publishers.
8. Davies, Anna. 2013. Identity Theft. Scholastic Inc.
9. Hastings, Glen, and Richard Marcus. 2006. Identity Theft, Inc.: A Wild Ride with the World’s #1 Identity Thief. Red Wheel Weiser.
10. Hayward, Claudia L. 2004. Identity Theft. Nova Publishers.
11. Hoffman, Sandra K., and Tracy G. McGinley. 2010. Identity Theft: A Reference Handbook. ABC-CLIO.
12. Kruger, Melissa. 2018. Identity Theft: Reclaiming the Truth of Our Identity in Christ.
13. Merrell, Ronald C., and Charles R. Doarn. 2017. “Identity Theft, a Reprise.” Telemedicine Journal and E-Health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association 23 (8): 619–20.
14. Meyerson, Debra E., and Danny Zuckerman. 2019. Identity Theft: Rediscovering
Ourselves After Stroke. Andrews McMeel Publishing.
15. Mulvey, J. Justin, Rahul Matnani, and Melissa M. Cushing. 2017. “Historical ABO Blood Group Discrepancy: A Blessing in Disguise to Unravel a Medical Identity Theft.” Transfusion 57 (4): 1096–97.
16. Oecd, and OECD. 2009. “Addressing Online Identity Theft.” https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056596-4-en.
17. Schwatz, Ari. n.d. “Scenario IV: Ubiquitous Identity Theft.” Economics of Identity Theft: Avoidance, Causes and Possible Cures. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68614-1_17.
18. Sharma, Akshit, and Paramdeep Baweja. 2017. “Medical Identity Theft: A Case Report.”
Annals of Internal Medicine 166 (5): 380.
19. Stickley, Jim. 2008. The Truth About Identity Theft. Que Publishing.
20. Williams, Denitza, Myfanwy Davies, Alison Fiander, Daniel Farewell, Sharon Hillier, and Kate Brain. 2017. “Women’s Perspectives on Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling in the Context of the UK Cervical Screening Programme.” Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy 20 (5): 1031–40.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
