Comparative study of some hormonal treatment regimens for inactive ovaries in cross- breeds cows

Authors

  • Asaad T. Habeb Nill Author
  • Enas A. Alyasiri Nill Author
  • Talib M. Al Homedawi Nill Author
  • Maythem A. Ismaeel Nill Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/wet6x378

Keywords:

Inactive Ovary, PMSG, CIDR, Cross breed, Days open

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the efficiency of different hormonal regimes used for treated post-partum inactive ovaries in local cross breed cows. The experimental conducted between October 2019 to April 2020. Thirty anestrous lactating cross – breed cows suffered from inactive ovaries at day 60-90 days postpartum their age was between 3-5 years old in Al-Zab city / Kirkuk province. These cows were divided randomly into three equal groups (10 cow on each one) according to the type of treatment was used, 1st group was treated by CIDR for 10 days and immediately withdrawal CIDR injected with 500 IU/ PMSG/ IM, 2nd group was treated with injected 500 IU/ PMSG/ IM, 3rd group was treated by CIDR only inserted intra-vaginal for 10 days, cows observed estrus were inseminated artificially. The reproductive performances (estrus response, estrus duration, no. of services / conception, pregnancy rates and days open)of treated cows were recorded. Plasma progesterone (P4) and estrogenconcentrations were estimated from each treatment group before and after treatment. The result of present study demonstrated that the using CIDR alone or with combination with PMSG revealed high percentage estrus response (80% and 100% respectively) compared with PMSG alone (40%) and shorter duration period (2.4 ± 0.63 days, 3.0 ± 0.84 days and 4.75 ± 0.72 days for CIDR with PMSG, CIDR alone and PMSG alone respectively), also, the hormonalregime of CIDR with PMSG and CIDR alone showed higher pregnancy rate (90% and 87.5 % respectively) and shorter days open (107.8 ± 8.36 days and 103.6 ± 6.43days respectively) than PMSG 500 IU alone (75% and 119.7 ± 7.52 days for pregnancy rate and days open respectively). higher (p<0.05) concentration of progesterone and estrogen hormones were recorded after treatment period in G1 (1.52 ± 0.08 ng / ml and 15.92 ± 3.51 pg/ml respectively) and G3 (and 1.21 ± 0.03 ng / ml and 14.22 ± 2.56 pg/ml respectively) compared with G2 (0.77 ± 0.02ng / ml and 10.15 ± 2.17pg / ml respectively). In conclusion the use of CIDR+PMSG or CIDR have more potency for improvement reproductive performance (estrus response, duration of response, pregnancy rate and days open) and each hormones of progesterone and estrogen in local cross breed cows suffering from post- partum inactive ovaries.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ahmed, W.M., 2007.Overview on some Factors Negatively Affecting Ovarian Activity in large Animals. Global Veterinaria 1(1):53-66,2007.

2. Ahmed, W.M.,2006.Advers condition affecting ovarian activity in large animals .proceeding of the third international .Conference of the Veterinary Research Division, National Research Center,Egypt,pp:251-253.

3. Al-Hamedawi, T. M.; Ghafel, A.H. and AL-Shammary, S.M (2016). Induction of fertile estrus by using CIDR and PMSG in anestrous lactating Holstein-Friesian cows suffering from inactive ovaries. Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science. 9 (1): 1-7.

4. Aminudeen, A. 1991. Effect of gonadotrophin releasing hormone on postpartum reproductive efficiency of cross-bred cows Clinical and endocrine aspects. Ph.D thesis submitted to Haryana Agric. University, Hisar (India).

5. Azawi OI, Ali MD, Oday SA, Salih A, Al-Hadad AS, Mouayad SJ, et al. Comparative efficacy of different CIDR protocols for the treatment of postpartum anestrous in Iraqi buffaloes. Vet World 2012; 5: 201-2.

6. Baruselli PS, Marques MO, Nasser LFT, Reis EL, Bo´ GA, 2003: Effect of eCG on pregnancy rates of lactating zebu beef cows treated with CIDR-B devices for timed artificial insemination [abstract]. Theriogenology 59, 214.

7. Bevers MM, Dieleman SJ, Van Tol HTM, Blankenstein DM, Van den Broek J, 1989: Changes in pulsatile secretion patterns of LH, FSH, progesterone, androstenedione and oestradiol in cows after superovulation with PMSG. J Reprod Fertil 87, 745–754.

8. Cutaia L, Trı´bulo R, Moreno D, Bo´ GA, 2003: Pregnancy rates in lactating beef cows treated with progesterone releasing devices, estradiol benzoate and equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG). Theriogenology 59, 216.

9. Dias C.C F.S.WechslerM.L.Day J.L.M.Vasconcelos ,Progesterone concentrations, exogenous equine chorionic gonadotropin, and timing of prostaglandin F2α treatment affect fertility in postpuberal Nelore heifers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.03.006.

10. Driancourt MA, 2001: Regulation of ovarian follicular dynamics in farm animals: implications for manipulation of reproduction. Theriogenology 55, 1211– 1239.

11. El-Wishy AB. The postpartum buffalo II. Acyclicity and anestrus. Anim Reprod Sci 2007; 97: 216– 236.

12. Ergene Osman,2012: Comparison of PRID+PGF2α+GnRH and GnRH+PGF2α+GnRH Protocols in the Treatment of Postpartum Anestrus Cows: https://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=javaa.2012.211.213.

13. Fabre-Nys, C., Martin, G.B., 1991. Roles of progesterone and oestradiol in determining the temporal sequence and quantitative expression of sexual receptivity and preovulatory LH surge in the ewe. Endocrinology 130, 367-379.

14. Garcı´a-Ispierto I, Lo´pez-Gatius F, Santolaria P, Ya´niz JL, Nogareda C, Lo´pezBe´jar M, 2007: Factors affecting the fertility of high producing dairy herds in northeastern Spain. Theriogenology 67, 632–638.

15. Garcia-Ispierto I, Lo´pez-Gatius F, BechSa`bat G, Ya´niz JL, Angulo E, Maris C, Floc’h S, Martino A, 2010: Effects of a progesterone-based oestrous synchronization protocol in 51- to 57-day postpartum high-producing dairy cows. Reprod Domest Anim 45, e168–e173.

16. Ghallab Rez S,Noseir Wael MB,2016: Comparative Efficiency of Different CIDR Protocols for Treatment of Postpartum Anestrous in Egyptian Buffaloes. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2016, Apr. 49 (2): 149-156 ISSN 1110-2047, www.alexjvs.com DOI: 10.5455/ajvs.211044.

17. Haddawi M.Dahham,Abbas H.N. Aal-Saied, W.S. Saied and Hassan A. H. Al-Tamimy. (2013). Treatment of anoestrus local Iraqi buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) using different hormones - field study. The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 38(1):121-123.

18. Hafez, E. and Hafes, B. (2000). Reproduction in farm animals. 7th . ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins U.S.A.P. P. 509.

19. Ispierto Garcia, I Lo´pez-Helguera , A Martino and F Lo´pez-Gatius ,2011 : Reproductive Performance of Anoestrous High-Producing Dairy Cows Improved by Adding Equine Chorionic Gonadotrophin to a Progesterone-Based Oestrous Synchronizing Protocol. Reprod Dom Anim doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011. 01954.x ISSN 0936-6768.

20. J.E. Prycea, M.D. Royalb , P.C. Garnsworthyc , I.L. Maod ,2004: Fertility in the high-producing dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 86 (2004) 125 – 135.

21. Kasabe, P. J.; Patil, P. N.; Kamble, D. and Dandge, P. B. (2012). “Nutritional, elemental analysis and antioxidant activity of garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.) seeds”. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 4:392-395.

22. Khamas D.J. and Radhi K.K. (2013). The validation of transrectal palpation of genital organs versus hormonal and post slaughter gross findings in bovine. The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 38(1): 56 - 61.

23. Kindahl, H., Kornmatitsuk, B., Gustaffson, H. (2004). The cow in endocrine focus before and after calving. Reprod. Dom. Anim., 39, 217–221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439- 0531.2004.00506.x

24. Lo´pez-Gatius F, 2003: Is fertility declining in dairy cattle? A retrospective study in northeastern Spain. Theriogenology 60, 89–99.

25. Lucy, M.C.(2001). Reproductive of dairy cows with slow involution loss in high production dairy cattle: where will it end? J. dairy Sci. 86: 3215-3217

26. Malik, R.K. 2005. Studies on ovarian follicular dynamics during early postpartum period, anestrus condition and hormonal therapies for induction of estrus in Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Ph.D. thesis submitted to CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (India ).

27. Mwaanga edwell siatambi, sławomir zduńczyk and tomasz janowski,2004: comparative study on the efficacy of hormonal and non hormonal treatment methods in ovarian afunction affected dairy cows . bull vet inst pulawy 48, 265-267, 2004.

28. Noakes, D. H. (1996). Functional forms of infertility. In: Arthur, G. H., Noakes, D. E., Pearson, H. and Parkinson, T. J. (Ed.). Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics. London, Philadelphia, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, W. B. Saunders Company Ltd. 356-371.

29. Peters, M.W. and Purstey, J.R. (2003). Timing of final GnRH of the ovsynch protocol affects ovulatory follicle size, subsequent luteal function in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 60: 1179-1204.

30. Roberts, S.Y. and Walter, R.T.(2007). Current therapy in large animal Theriogenology. 2nd Ed. Saunders-Elsevier. 865-879.

31. Roelofs J, Lo´pez-Gatius F, Hunter RHF, Van Eerdenburg FJCM, Hanzen CH, 2010: When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects. Theriogenology 74, 327–344.

32. Rostami B, Niasari-Naslaji A, Vojgani M, Nikjou D, Amanlou H, Gerami A, 2011: Effect of eCG on early resumption of ovarian activity in postpartum dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 128, 100–106.

33. Sa´ Filho MF, Ayres H, Ferreira RM, Marques MO, Reis EL, Silva RCP, Rodrigues CA, Madureira EH, Bo´ GA, Baruselli PS, 2011a: Equine chorionic gonadotropin and gonadotropin-releasing hormone enhance fertility in a norgestomet-based, timed artificial insemination protocol in suckled Nelore (Bos indicus) cows. Theriogenology 73, 651–658.

34. Sa´ Filho MF, Crespilho AM, Santos JEP, Perry GA, Baruselli PS, 2011b: Ovarian follicle diameter at timed insemination and estrous response influence likelihood of ovulation and pregnancy after estrous synchronization with progesterone or progestin-based protocols in suckled Bos indicus cows. Anim Reprod Sci 120, 23–30.

35. Singh J, Verma HK, Singh KB, Singh N (2006). Incidence of reproductive disorders in dairy animals in different agroclimatic regions in Punjab. J. Res. 43 (3): 224 – 227.

36. Singh, L.P., Singh, B.K. 1986. Studies on incidence and treatment of anestrus desi cow. Indian Vet. J. 63: 961- 962.

37. Singh, S., Wani, N.A., Maurya, S.N., 2003. Use of different hormones for the treatment of postpartum anestrous in buffaloes under field condition. Indian Journal of Animal Science 73, 894-896.

38. Walsh, S.W. ; Williams, E.J. and Evans, A.C.O. (2011). A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science. 123 : 127–138.

39. Wright, P.J., Malmo, J. 1992. Pharmacologic manipulation of fertility. Veterinary Clinic North America Food Animal Practice 8: 57–89.

40. Zahid Naseer1,2* , Ejaz Ahmad1 , Nemat Ullah2 , Muhammad Yaqoob2 , Zeeshan Akbar2,2013. Treatment of anestrous Nili-Ravi buffaloes using eCG and CIDR protocols Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction 2013; 2(3): 215-217.

Downloads

Published

30.11.2020

How to Cite

Habeb, A. T., Alyasiri, E. A., Homedawi, T. M. A., & Ismaeel, M. A. (2020). Comparative study of some hormonal treatment regimens for inactive ovaries in cross- breeds cows. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(9), 4839-4860. https://doi.org/10.61841/wet6x378