Impact of Deviant Workplace Behavior in The Internal Organizational Crises: An Empirical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/tf0j9d45Keywords:
Deviant workplace behavior, internal organizational crises,, the Directorate of Education for NajafAbstract
The research aims to explore the extent of Deviant workplace behavior in internal organizational crises, in the General Directorate of Education of Najaf. To achieve the objectives of the research, influence and correlation relationships between the dimensions of the variables were studied. Using the descriptive-analytical method, (99) questionnaires were distributed directly to the target community. (94) Forms were retrieved, and the number of valid questionnaires for statistical analysis was (90). After presenting the collected data and analyzing it by identifying the consistency of the sample responses on the questionnaire paragraphs and selecting hypotheses using the statistical programs represented by (SPSS.V.20, SMART PLS). The results show the validity of the research hypotheses. Therefore, a number of conclusions were reached and a set of recommendations was developed.
Downloads
References
Aldag, R. J. (2016). Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Business and Management: Oxford University Press.
Alias, M., Rasdi, R. M., Ismail, M., & Samah, B. A. (2013). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour: HRD agenda for Malaysian support personnel. European Journal of Training and Development.
Appelbaum, S. H., Deguire, K. J., & Lay, M. (2005). The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behaviour. Corporate Governance: The Int J of Effective Board Performance, 5(4), 43-55.
Appelbaum, S. H., Iaconi, G. D., & Matousek, A. (2007). Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: causes, impacts, and solutions. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society.
Appelbaum, S. H., & Roy‐Girard, D. (2007). Toxins in the workplace: affect on organizations and employees. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society.
Bakker, M. H., van Bommel, M., Kerstholt, J. H., & Giebels, E. (2018). The influence of accountability for the crisis and type of crisis communication on people’s behavior, feelings and relationship with the government. Public relations review, 44(2), 277-286.
Björck, A. (2016). Crisis typologies revisited: An interdisciplinary approach. Central European Business Review, 5(3), 25-37.
Bourdage, J. S., Goupal, A., Neilson, T., Lukacik, E.-R., & Lee, N. (2018). Personality, equity sensitivity, and discretionary workplace behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 144-150.
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Organizing for crisis management: Building governance capacity and legitimacy. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 887-897.
Eliadis, A. (2019). Leading through Turbulent Times and Crises: What Human Attributes Play a Role in the Ability of Women Leaders to Navigate Crises in Their Organization? , Fielding Graduate University,
Jawahar, I. (2002). A model of organizational justice and workplace aggression. Journal of management, 28(6), 811- 834.
Klann, G. (2003). Crisis leadership: Using military lessons, organizational experiences, and the power of influence to lessen the impact of chaos on the people you lead: Center for Creative Leadership.
Kong, M. (2018). Effect of perceived negative workplace gossip on employees’ behaviors. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1112.
Lalonde, C., & Roux-Dufort, C. (2013). Challenges in teaching crisis management: Connecting theories, skills, and reflexivity. Journal of Management Education, 37(1), 21-50.
Light, P. (2008). Predicting Organizational Crisis Readiness: Perspectives and Practices toward a Pathway to Preparedness, Policy Report written for the Center for Catastrophe Preparedness and Response.
Marsen, S. (2020). Navigating Crisis: The Role of Communication in Organizational Crisis. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(2), 163-175.
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of applied psychology, 92(4), 1159.
O'Connor, P. J., Stone, S., Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2017). Deviant behavior in constrained environments: Sensation-Seeking predicts workplace deviance in shallow learners. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 20- 25.
O’Neill, T. A., Lewis, R. J., & Carswell, J. J. (2011). Employee personality, justice perceptions, and the prediction of workplace deviance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 595-600.
Pletzer, J. L., Oostrom, J., Bentvelzen, M., & de Vries, R. (2019). Comparing domain-and facet-level relations of the HEXACO personality model with workplace deviance. Personality and Individual Differences, 152.
Racherla, P., & Hu, C. (2009). A framework for knowledge-based crisis management in the hospitality and tourism industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(4), 561-577.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of management journal, 38(2), 555-572.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (Seventh). Nueva York: Pearson Education.
Snyder, P., Hall, M., Robertson, J., Jasinski, T., & Miller, J. S. (2006). Ethical rationality: A strategic approach to organizational crisis. Journal of business ethics, 63(4), 371-383.
Yıldız, B., & Alpkan, L. (2015). A theoretical model on the proposed predictors of destructive deviant workplace behaviors and the mediator role of alienation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 330-338.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
