Assessment for No Mobile Phone Phobia (Nomophobia)

Authors

  • Burhan Hadi Assist. Lecturer in Nursing Department, Altoosi University College, Iraq. M.Sc., Mental Health Nursing Author
  • Dr. Ali Faris Abdul Hussein Instructor in Nursing Department, Altoosi University College, Iraq. Ph.D. Community Health Author
  • Kafi Mohammad Nasir Al Asadi Instructor in Nursing Department, Altoosi University College, Iraq. Ph.D. Community Health Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/gfp8rd92

Keywords:

nomophobia, mobile phone

Abstract

Background: Background: mobile phones today have grown to be an important section of our techno-culture mostly on more youthful human population. Discomfort, anxiety, nervousness, or distress caused by moving away from the cell phone is called "Nomophobia". Objective: this study was conducted to identify and assess the nomophobia and some variables that have a relationship and influence the subject of the study.

Methodology: assessed for nomophobia through a special questionnaire to measure. The questionnaire consisted of (20) question. Each question consists of seven levels of answer according to the Likert scale. The ratings of each element were classified and the grades were classified into "mild "21-59", "moderate" "66-99", and "severe "more than 100" degrees. A study was conducted on random sample of one hundred individuals from different age groups. A tool was used to measure nomophobia in the participating sample. The information analyzed by applying descriptive statistical measures in addition to inferential statistical measures.

Results: The results showed that the highest participation rate was 52% in males for the sex, whereas urban area was 54% and 53% were unemployed. The percentage of young people was the highest by 81% and the percentage of unmarried was the highest by 64%, as well as the proportion of recipients of university degree is the highest by 70% This confirms that the proportion of unemployed graduates are the highest in the sample as well as the age group

 

(15-30) is highest share of research. The severe nomophobia is 70% and the lowest percentage is mild nomophobia by 9% and the moderate nomophobia rate is 21%.

Conclusion: mobile phones and new technology formed our daily life, several aspects, the most important negative and positive.

Recommendations: The study recommended practical tips to reduce the disadvantages of relying on mobile phone, which is to spend time with family at the end of the week without using technology and not take the phone to the bedroom because it is harmful to human health and do not use the phone in the indoor, such as car or elevator and Do not talk in the mobile phone while charging and keep the phone away from you while you sleep, eat, sit with family members, do not use some social applications everyday unless necessary, receive urgent messages and set up centers and sanatoriums to reduce addiction and phobia in children and young people.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Dixit S, Shukla H, Bhagwat AK, Bindal A, Goyal A, Zaidi AK, et al. A study to evaluate mobile phone dependence among students of a medical college and associated hospital of central India. Indian J Community Med. 2010; 35(2):339.

2. Donner J. The rules of beeping: Exchanging messages via intentional "missed calls" on mobile phones. J Comp Mediated Com. 2007; 13(1):1-22. Available from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/donner.html.

3. King AL, Valença AM, Silva AC, Sancassiani F, Machado S, Nardi AE. “Nomophobia”: Impact of cell phone use interfering with symptoms and emotions of individuals with panic disorder compared with a control group. Clin Pract Epidemiol Mental Health CP & EMH. 2014; 10:28.

4. Raines ML. An introduction to Nomophobia (Learn about Nomophobia) Available from: http://www.nomopho-bic.co.uk/ last accessed on Jan 21st, 2014.

5. Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Giovanni Del Puente. A proposal for including nomophobia in the new DSM-Psychology Re-search and Behavior Management 2014:7 155–160.

6. Bragazzi NL, Del Puente G. A proposal for including nomophobia in the new DSM-V. Psychol Res Behavior Manag. 2014; 7:155.

7. Dasgupta P, Bhattacherjee S, Dasgupta S, Roy JK, Mukherjee A, Biswas R. Nomophobic behaviors among smartphone using medical and engineering students in two colleges of West Bengal. Indian J Public Health. 2017; 61:199.

8. Prasad M, Patthi B, Singla A, Gupta R, Saha S, Kumar JK, Malhi R, Pandita V. Nomophobia: A Cross-sectional Study to Assess Mobile Phone Usage Among Dental

Students. J Clin Diagnos Res. 2017; 11(2):34.

9. Available at: www.momentarium.org/experiments/ 7a10me/sadie_plant.pdf. On the mobile the effects of mobile telephones on social and individual. Accessed on 3 February 2018.

10. Ramudu RV, Raj R, Purushothaman M, Reddy KG, Ramana PV. A study of assessment of mobile phone dependence among medical students in tertiary care teaching hospital. Indo-Am J Pharm Res. 2015; 5(8):2583–7.

11. World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.

12. Nikhita CS, Jadhav PR, Ajinkya SA. Prevalence of mobile phone dependence in secondary school Adolescents. JCDR. 2015; 9(11):6.

13. Kanmani A, Bhavani U, Maragatham RS. NOMOPHOBIA–An Insight into Its Psychological Aspects in India. Int J Indian Psychol. 2017; 4(2):5-15.

14. Walsh SP, White KM, Young RMD. Needing to connect: the effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Aust J Psychol. 2010; 62(4): 194-203.

15. Yen CF, Tang TC, Yen JY, Lin HC, Huang CF, Liu SC, Ko CH. Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan. J Adolescent. 2009 Aug; 32(4): 863-73.

Downloads

Published

30.11.2020

How to Cite

Hadi , B., Hussein , A. F. A., & Al Asadi , K. M. N. (2020). Assessment for No Mobile Phone Phobia (Nomophobia). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(9), 4022-4028. https://doi.org/10.61841/gfp8rd92