Interactive groups and the fulfillment of tasks in students from rural areas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/y39et214Keywords:
Interactive groups, Learning communities, rural area, task fulfillment, teaching-learningAbstract
n the educational field, a problem that has plagued the normal development of institutions with a high incidence in rural areas, is the non-accompaniment of parents in curricular and extracurricular tasks of students, due to lack of time, disinterest, illiteracy, intra-family difficulties and little consolidation of knowledge by teachers. For this reason, the need arises to implement interactive groups within the classroom, to improve the fulfillment of tasks in rural students with the guidance of their representatives and teachers. In effect, the research was directed to qualitative methodology, the inductive-deductive method, bibliographic search and unstructured observation, who will give scientific rigor to the investigation, to demonstrate real situations based on the problems established in the academic process, at the In this regard, the results obtained reflect the non-compliance of the obligations of the students, analyzed from the cognitive, attitudinal, emotional and social factors, with the intention that teachers and education authorities know the difficult situation faced by a large number of children and their instead get parental involvement. The application of learning communities in schools is essential and thus improve the deficit of non-compliance, raising awareness among all the actors and thus contributing efforts as a team, having as a priority the ideal training of students; establishing what will be the best way to see this need overcome, where the support of all members of the educational community is evident.
Downloads
References
1. Aguerri, L. (2017). Learning communities and family participation: A case study. Doctoral thesis, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville. Retrieved from https://rio.upo.es/xmlui/handle/10433/4806
2. Aroca, J. (2017). Access to education and its influence on the poverty conditions of the rural population in Ecuador (2000–2015). Undergraduate thesis, Technical University of Ambato. Retrieved from https://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/jspui/bitstream/123456789/25202/1/T3970e.pdf
3. Bermeo, J. (2019). Analysis of the factors associated with non-compliance with school tasks in the fourth year of basic general education. Undergraduate thesis, Salesian Polytechnic University, Cuenca. Retrieved from https://dspace.ups.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/18023/1/UPSCT008564.pdf
4. Calderón, A. (2015). Situation of rural education in Ecuador. Retrieved from https://www.rimisp.org/wp-content/files_mf/1439406281ATInformeTecnicoSituaciondelaEducacionruralenEficiente.pdf
5. Castillo, A. (2016). Interactive groups: A pedagogical strategy that strengthens emotional literacy for conflict resolution. Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Libre, Bogotá. Retrieved from https://repository.unilibre.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10901/9586
6. Castillo, C. (2011). Learning communities: An option in the face of school failure. Revista Sede Regional, 12(23), 74–102. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=66622603006
7. Centeno, J., Flores, E., & Alvarado, M. (2018). Criticism of logical positivism in rural schools in Ecuador. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 10(4), 91–96. Retrieved from http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rus/v10n4/2218-3620-rus-10-04-91.pdf
8. Chocarro, E., & Sáenz, M. (2015). Interactive groups: Strategy to improve coexistence, participation and learning. Revista Complutense de Educación, 27(2), 585–601. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RCED/article/view/46911
9. Community of Research on Excellence for All. (2018). Formation of learning communities. Retrieved from https://www.comunidaddeaprendizaje.com.es/uploads/materials/604/a72512f2a3e73ee20d1e93230bc7dfe1.pdf
10. Eirín, R. (2018). Learning communities as a professional development strategy for physical education teachers. Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), 44(1), 259–278. Retrieved from https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-07052018000100259
11. García, B., Loredo, J., & Carranza, G. (2008). Analysis of teachers’ educational practice. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 10(1), 1–15. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1607-40412008000300006
12. García, R., Molina, S., Grande, L., & Buslón, N. (2016). Analysis of interactions in successful educational actions. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva, 10(1), 115–132. Retrieved from https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rlei/v10n1/art07.pdf
13. Garofalo, R., & Villao, F. (2018). Rural school crisis: A silenced reality. Revista Conrado, 14(62), 152–157. Retrieved from http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1990-86442018000200026
14. Hernández, C., Jiménez, T., Araiza, I., & Vega, M. (2015). School as a learning community. Ra Ximhai, 11(4), 15–30. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/461/46142596001.pdf
15. Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, M. (2014). Research methodology (6th ed.). Mexico: McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved from http://observatorio.epacartagena.gov.co
16. Jiménez, A., & Rodríguez, M. (2016). Learning communities: Development and sustainability. Cuestiones Pedagógicas, 25(1), 105–118. Retrieved from http://institucional.us.es/revistas/cuestiones/25/08_MI_25.pdf
17. Lena, M. (2015). The child in rural areas and its impact on school learning. Undergraduate thesis, University of the Republic, Montevideo. Retrieved from https://sifp.psico.edu.uy
18. Lombeida, E. (2018). Poverty and inequality report. National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INEC), Ecuador. Retrieved from https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec
19. López, P., Barreto, A., Mendoza, E., & Del Salto, M. (2015). Low academic performance and family dysfunction. MEDISAN, 19(9), 1–4. Retrieved from http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/san/v19n9/san14199.pdf
20. Martinic, S. (2015). Time and school learning. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 20(61), 479–499. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbedu/v20n61
21. MINEDUC. (2019). Learning networks guide. Ministry of Education, Ecuador. Retrieved from https://educacion.gob.ec
22. Molina, S. (2007). Interactive groups as inclusive practice. Doctoral thesis, University of Barcelona. Retrieved from https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/31986
23. United Nations. (1985). Economic Commission for Latin America. CEPAL, 21, 107–130. Retrieved from https://repositorio.cepal.org
24. Núñez, M., Espinoza, C., Acuña, C., Vargas, L., & Lagos, I. (2017). Interactive groups and learning outcomes. Educação em Revista, 33(1), 1–29. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.br/pdf/edur/v33
25. Ordoñez, R., Rodríguez, M., & Rodríguez, J. (2017). Interactive groups as improvement strategy. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 35(1), 71–91. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2833/283349061005.pdf
26. Ortega, M., & Cárcamo, H. (2018). Family–school relationship in rural contexts. Revista Educación, 27(52), 98–118. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.pe
27. Parra, M. (2017). Analysis of homework in culturally diverse contexts. Doctoral thesis, University of Granada. Retrieved from https://hera.ugr.es/tesisugr
28. Ramírez, A. (2015). Rural teacher profile assessment. Revista Electrónica Educare, 19(3), 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=194140994006
29. Ruiz, J., Castillo, M., & Galvis, W. (2016). Lexical meaning of “school task.” Forma y Función, 29(1), 151–178. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21946206007
30. Sánchez, L. (2014). Interactive groups and family involvement. Undergraduate thesis, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/61471135.pdf
31. Serrano, M., Díez, J., & Guasch, M. (2018). Family training with vulnerable groups. Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia), 44(3), 35–52. Retrieved from https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/estped/v44n3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
