Examining the Economic Behaviour Among Fisherman Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/njmqz098Keywords:
Economic behaviour, Rationality, IrrationalityAbstract
This study is aimed at examining the economics behaviour among fisherman community in Prigi, Watulimo District, Trenggalek Regency, Indonesiatechn. This study used descriptive qualitative to develop theories that are built through data obtained in the field. The results showed that the condition of the Prigi fishermen was still deficient in economic education and financial management. Therefore, it is necessary to increase economic knowledge and financial management. In order to obtain adequate thinking rationality to carry on life and fulfill daily needs. On the other hand, there is a need for training and provision of business assistance to increase the fishermen's income from the catch. Uncertain catches and price monopoly snares by collectors make it difficult for fishers to expand their businesses outside the region. The urgent step that must be taken by the government is entrepreneurship training to realize how important it is to invest and make efforts to support the profession of fishers. Through this training, it is hoped that the fishing community, when meeting their immediate needs, does not always owe money. The results of our study offer the rationality and irrationality of the economic behavior of fishing communities that can be a strategic input for the government and stakeholders, in order to empower further and create prosperity for the fishing community.
Downloads
References
[1] Bandettini, P.A. (2012). Twenty years of functional MRI: the science and the stories. Neuro Image, 62, 575– 588.
[2] Cahaya, A. (2015). Fishermen Community in the Coastal Area: A Note from Indonesian Poor Family.
Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 29–33. doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00801-1.
[3] Camerer, C. F. (2014). Behavioral economics. Current Biology, 24(18), R867–R871. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.040.
[4] Damsar. (2012). Pengantar Sosiologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
[5] Dorian Jullien.(2016). A methodological perspective on behavioral economics and the role of language in economic rationality. Economics and Finance. Université Nice Sophia Antipolis [English]. ffNNT : NICE0012ff. fftel-01346588f.
[6] Feigenbaum, J. (2011). Optimal Irrational Behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, (77) pp 285-303.
[7] Glimcher, P.W., Dorris, M.C., Bayer, H.M. (2005). Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 213–256.
[8] Hastie, R., Dawes, R.M. (2001). Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
[9] Hernandez JGV, Ortega RP (2019). Bounded rationality in decision–making. MOJ Research Review, 2(1):1‒8.
DOI: 10.15406/mojcrr.2019.02.00047
[10] Johnson JC. (1986). Social Networks And Innovation Adoption: A Look At Burt’s Use Of Structural Equivalence. Social Networks, 8(4): 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(86)90002-X
[11] Kahneman, D. dan Tversky A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Journal of Econometrica, 47(2): 263-292.
[12] Kaplale R. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kemiskinan di Kota Ambon (Studi Kasus di DusunKranjang Desa Waiyame Kec. Teluk Ambon dan DesaWaiheru Kec. Teluk Ambon Baguala Kota Ambon). Jurnal Agribisnis Kepulauan 1.
[13] Kaslan, A. T. (1982). Seuntai Pengetahuan Tentang Usaha Tani. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
[14] Kotler, P. and G. Armstrong. (2004). Prinsip Prinsip Pemasaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.
[15] Kotler. P. (2011). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[16] Kusnadi. (2000). Nelayan: Strategi Adaptasi dan Jaringan Sosial. Bandung: Humaniora Utama Press.
[17] Lawang RMZ. (2004). Kapital Sosial dalam Perspektif Sosiologistik: Suatu Pengantar. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
[18] Marshall, A. (1961). Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan for the Royal Economic Society.
[19] Martadwiprani, H., & Rahmawati, D. (2014). Economic Development as Community Resilience Enhancement in Minapolis Coastal Settlement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 135, 106–111. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.332.
[20] Miles, B. M., & Huberman, M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: UIP.
[21] Ministry of Environment. (2007). Rencana Aksi Nasional dalam Menghadapi Perubahan Iklim [National Action Plan in Mitigating Climate Change]. Ministry of Environment. Jakarta. [Bahasa Indonesia].
[22] Muqorobin, Masyhudi. (2004). Landscape for The Future Islamic Economics. Jurnal ISEFID, vol. 3, No.3.
[23] Musshoff, O., & Hirschauer, N. (2011). A behavioral economic analysis of bounded rationality in farm financing decisions. Agricultural Finance Review, 71(1), 62–83. doi:10.1108/00021461111128165
[24] Nadjib, M. (2013a). Pendekatan Studi Sistem Pembiayaan Maysarakat Nelayan. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
[25] Nadjib, M. (2013b). Implikasi dan Solusi Kebijakan Atas Pembiayaan Nelayan. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
[26] Njoku, I. F. (2004). The information needs and information-seeking behaviour of fishermen in Lagos State, Nigeria. The International Information 26; Library Review, 36 (4), 297-307.
[27] Nurkholis, Nuryadin, D., Syaifudin, N., Handika, R., Setyobudi, R. H., & Udjianto, D. W. (2016). The Economic of Marine Sector in Indonesia. Aquatic Procedia, 7, 181–186. doi:10.1016/j.aqpro.2016.07.025.
[28] Pareto, V. (1971). Manual of Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelley.
[29] Rabin, M. (2002). A Perspective on Psychology and Economics. Repositories.cd/lib.org/iber/econ/E02-313.
[30] Renner, P. Fotr J., and Svecova L. (2012).The Influence of Irrationality on the innovativeness of Variants and the Quality of Decision Making. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences. (41) pp 570-576.
[31] Rescher, N. (1998). Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiryinto The Nature and the Rationale of Reason.
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
[32] Scott, J.C. (1972). The Erosion of Patron-Client Bonds and Social Change in Rural Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Studies, 32(1):5 -37.
[33] Tomer, J. (2008). Beyond The Rationality of Economic Man, Toward The True Rationalityof Human Man.The Journal of Socio-Economics, (37) pp 1703-1712.
[34] Tomer, J. F. (2007). What is behavioral economics? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 463–479. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.007.
[35] Vriend, N. J. (1996). Rational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 29(2), 263–285. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(95)00063-1
[36] Walsh, A. (2011). Learning from pondlife and fishermen: towards a modular financial services industry.
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. 19 (4), 312-322.
[37] Yochum, N; Starr, R. M; & Wendt, D. E. (2011). Utilizing Fishermen Knowledge and Expertise: Keys to Success for Collaborative Fisheries Research. Fisheries. 36 (12), 593-605.
[38] Zarri, L. (2010). Behavioral Economics Has Two Souls: Do They Both Depart from Economic Rationality?
The Journal of Socio Economics, (39) pp 562-567.
[39] Zuhdi, U., Putranto, N. A. R., Prasetyo, A. D. (2015). An Input–Output Approach to Know the Dynamics of Total Output of Livestock Sectors: The Case of Indonesia, in 2nd World Conference on Business, Economics and Management. In: Andreea I. I. (Ed). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 109, 634–638.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
