Factors Affecting Voluntary Auditor Switching In LQ45 Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/0mvhjr37Keywords:
Auditor, Switching, Financial, Distress, Delay, Opinion, ROAAbstract
Aim of this research is to examine the effect of financial distress, audit opinion, audit delay, and changes in percentage of ROA on switching auditors of LQ 45 companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2018. Secondary data is sourced from financial statements, published by Capital Market on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The type of research used in this study is testing hypotheses, using purposive sampling method. There are 54 data samples chosen as research objects. This study uses logistic regression analysis to test the hypothesis. The results showed that of financial distress, audit opinion, audit delay, and changes in percentage of ROA had no significant effect on the auditor switching with a negative coefficient direction. Simultaneously, financial distress, audit opinion, audit delay, and changes in percentage of ROA had no significant effect.
Downloads
References
[1] A. Wea and D. Murdiawati, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Auditor Switching Secara Voluntary Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur,” J. Ekon. dan bisnis, 2015.
[2] B. L. Handoko and M. Kusuma, “The effect of financial distress, debt default and audit tenure on going concern opinion,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., 2019.
[3] H. Paino, M. Smith, and Z. Ismail, “Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional behaviour,” J. Appl. Account. Res., 2012.
[4] A. Salim and S. Rahayu, “Pengaruh Opini Audit, Ukuran KAP, Pergantian Manajemen, dan Financial Distress terhadap Auditor Switching,” e-Proceeding Manag., 2014.
[5] A. K. Sari, D. R. Deviyanti, and A. Kusumawardani, “Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi voluntary auditor switching pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di bei periode 2010-2015,” AKUNTABEL, 2018.
[6] Z. Liu and S. Lin, “Determinants and consequences of voluntary switches to Chinese auditors in Hong Kong,”
J. Contemp. Account. Econ., 2019.
[7] N. Pawitri and K. Yadnyana, “PENGARUH AUDIT DELAY, OPINI AUDIT, REPUTASI AUDITOR DAN PERGANTIAN MANAJEMEN PADA VOLUNTARY AUDITOR SWITCHING,” E-Jurnal Akunt., 2015.
[8] S. Apriliana and L. Agustina, “The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach,” J. Din. Akunt., 2017.
[9] H. Kim, H. Lee, and J. E. Lee, “Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality,” J. Appl. Bus. Res., 2015.
[10] A. Gepp, M. K. Linnenluecke, T. J. O’Neill, and T. Smith, “Big data techniques in auditing research and practice: Current trends and future opportunities,” J. Account. Lit., vol. 40, pp. 102–115, 2018.
[11] W. K. Peprah, “Predictive Relationships among the Elements of the Fraud Diamond Theory: The Perspective of Accountants,” Acad. Res. Accounting, Financ. Manag. Sci., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 141–148, 2018.
[12] M. L. Defond and C. S. Lennox, “Do PCAOB Inspections Improve the Quality of Internal Control Audits?,” J. Account. Res., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 591–627, 2017.
[13] Y. M. Hassan, “Determinants of audit report lag: evidence from Palestine,” J. Account. Emerg. Econ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13–32, 2016.
[14] B. L. Handoko, E. Hendra, and B. Anandita, “Factors affecting fraudulent statement in forensic accounting perspective,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 28–32, 2019.
[15] F. Chen, S. Peng, S. Xue, Z. Yang, and F. Ye, “Do Audit Clients Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Partner-Level Evidence,” J. Account. Res., 2016.
[16] D. Lianto, “Determinan Voluntary Auditor Switching : Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia,” PARSIMONIA, 2017.
[17] B. H. Teh, T. S. Ong, A. B. Samuel, and S. H. Ng, “An empirical study of auditors switching, corporate governance and financial performances of Malaysian public listed companies (PLCs),” J. Pengur., vol. 47, pp. 43–53, 2016.
[18] S. Corbella, C. Florio, G. Gotti, and S. A. Mastrolia, “Audit firm rotation, audit fees and audit quality: The experience of Italian public companies,” J. Int. Accounting, Audit. Tax., 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
