REALIZING FAIR BUSINESS COMPETITION IN THE INDONESIAN BUSINESS WORLD IN THE ERA OF GLOBALIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/60nn6879Keywords:
business competition, globalization, monopolyAbstract
The development of the global economy shows symptoms of unfair economic competition, especially the presence of monopoly efforts of the world economic power. This kind of phenomenon will certainly affect economic conditions including economic growth which will only be influenced by large corporations from super power countries. In Indonesia itself, there are indications of efforts to monopolize business by large corporations that will unconsciously erode the national economy at the macro level and the economy of small people. Hence, the problem lies on the way Indonesia prepares itself to overcome these things, especially in the development of the legal system that regulates the formal legal business competition. This article aims to describe the way the legal position and system in Indonesia should be formed to overcome the negative impacts of business competition and create fair business competition. The utilized method was the socio legal research approach which is intended to study and examine the interrelationship between the law with other institutions.
Downloads
References
1. Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, V. (2005). Understanding small business taxpayers: Issues of deterrence, tax morale, fairness and work practice. International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 539–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242605055911
2. Anoraga, P. (1995). Perusahaan Multinasional dan Penanaman Modal Asing. Jakarta: PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
3. Aristeus, S. (2002). Pengaruh Globalisasi Perdagangan Barang dan Jasa Terhadap Makro Ekonomi Indonesia. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 1(1), 188.
4. Bahçe, S., & Eres, B. (2013). Competing Paradigms of Competition: Evidence from the Turkish Manufacturing Industry. Review of Radical Political Economics, 45(2), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613412458650
5. Beaver, W., & Venkatachalam, M. (2003). Differential Pricing of Components of Bank Loan Fair Values. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 18(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0301800103
6. Bhagat, G. (2017). Public Procurement: A Competition Perspective. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 63(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556117699736
7. Byun, H. S., Lee, J. H., & Park, K. S. (2018). Product Market Competition and the Ownership Choice of Business Groups: Evidence from Korean Chaebols. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(1), 100–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1240675
8. Cohen, M., & McDonough, K. (2007). Information start-ups need to succeed: Small business development at New York Public Library’s Science, Industry and Business Library. Business Information Review, 24(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382107078868
9. Corradi, M. C. (2018). Notes on competition and justum pretium theory and practice in medieval Italy: Lessons for modern EU competition price theory? Antitrust Bulletin, 63(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X18780558
10. Dasril, A. S. N., & Kusumastuti, S. Y. (2014). Intensitas Persaingan Industri Pengolahan Makanan di Indonesia Sebelum dan Sesudah Kebijakan Pengsaingan Usaha. MIMBAR, 30(2), 127–136.
11. de Gelder, E., de Vaal, A., Driessen, P. H., Sent, E. M., & Bloemer, J. (2019). Market competition and ethical standards: the case of fair trade mainstreaming. Review of Social Economy, 67(64). https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2019.1650292
12. Donleavy, G. (2019). An inquiry into the origins of fair value. Accounting History, 24(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373218818847
13. Ducci, F., & Trebilcock, M. (2019). The revival of fairness discourse in competition policy. Antitrust Bulletin, 64(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X18822580
14. Fuady, M. (1999). Hukum Anti Monopoli (Menyongsong Era Persaingan Sehat). Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bhakti.
15. Gane, N. (2020). Competition: A Critical History of a Concept. Theory, Culture and Society, 37(2), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419878247
16. Geradin, D., & Katsifis, D. (2020). “Trust me, I’m fair”: analysing Google’s latest practices in ad tech from the perspective of EU competition law. European Competition Journal, 0(0), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2019.1706413
17. Golding, K. M. (2009). Fair trade’s dual aspect: The communications challenge of fair trade marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 29(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146708327632
18. Grewal, R., Chakravarty, A., & Saini, A. (2010). Governance Mechanisms in Business-to-Business Electronic Markets. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.4.045
19. Hartono, S. R. (2000). Kapita Selekta Hukum Ekonomi. Bandung: Mundar Maju.
20. Hayashi, S., & Arai, K. (2019). How competition law should react in the age of big data and artificial intelligence. Antitrust Bulletin, 64(3), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X19863591
21. Hutabarat, P. M. (1999). Analisis Ekonomi Terhadap Hukum Persaingan. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 2(1).
22. Kurjanska, M., & Risse, M. (2008). Fairness in trade II: Export subsidies and the Fair Trade movement. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 7(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X07085150
23. Napitupulu, M. S. (2001). Manajemen (terjemahan) dari Management. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
24. Nasution, M. A. (2000). Globalisasi dan Migrasi Antar Negara. Bandung: PT Alumni.
25. Ojiako, U., Marshall, A., Luke, M. A., & Chipulu, M. (2012). Managing Competition Risk: A Critical Realist Philosophical Exploration. Competition & Change, 16(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1179/1024529412z.0000000010
26. Pakamanis, M. (2016). The role of class actions in ensuring effective enforcement of competition law infringements in the European Union. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 2(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icj.2016.11.001
27. Rahman, N. A., & Ahamat, H. (2015). Competition Law and the Malaysian Financial Sector. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.338
28. Rajagukguk, E. (2000). Undang-undang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jakarta: LPHI.
29. Rollings, N., & Warlouzet, L. (2018). Business history and European integration: How EEC competition policy affected companies’ strategies. Business History, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2018.1488966
30. Santo, P. A. F. D. (2011). Merger, Akusisi dan Konsolidasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Binus Business Review, 2(1), 423. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v2i1.1149
31. Schaper, M. T. (2010). Competition law, enforcement and the Australian small business sector. Small Enterprise Research, 17(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.5172/ser.17.1.7
32. Silalahi, J. M. U. (2002). Persaingan Bebas Di Rangka Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 19(1), 55.
33. Suparnyo. (2019). Cooperatives in the Indonesian Constitution and the Role in Empowering Members: A Case Study. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(3).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
