TUTORIAL GUIDANCE THROUGH BLENDED LEARNING IN IMPROVING AN ABILITY NURSING EDUCATION COMPETENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ewfsr342Keywords:
Competency Test, Nurses, Blended Learning, NursingAbstract
Purpose: to analyze the effect of tutoring through the blended learning in improving the ability in pre test of nurses competency results.
Method: This research used pre-experimental study design, the number of respondents was 60 respondents. Samples were taken by simple random sampling. The inclusion criteria of the study sample were: final semester students who would face competency exams who were not in a sick condition. The data was collected using the nurse competency test. With a total of 120 questions with the results of the Cronbach's alpha test on the competency test variable is 0.95. The data analysis used descriptive statistics to calculate the characteristics of respondents with frequency distribution, percentage, mean and standard deviation (sd). Paired t test is used to analyze the effect of differences that were before and after tutoring through the blended learning.
Results: showed the implementation of tutoring through the blended learning that are showing differences before and after following the tutorial guidance program through blended learning, with the test value paired t test p = 0.000. Other results from tutoring through the blended learning are in-house training and online training services, 9 (nine) enrichment book products for nurse competency tests.
Conclusion: to improve the results of the nurse competency test that the guidance can be made in tutorials and online through program blended learning. Thus tutoring through blended learning can be used as an alternative guidance for nursing competency tests for nursing students who can prepare nurse competency tests in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
1. Cahill, H. (1996). Role definition: nurse practitioners or clinicians' assistants? British Journal of Nursing, 5(22), 1382–1386.
2. Wulandari, D. (2015). Metode Jigsaw Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Metakognitif. Profesi (Profesional Islam): Media Publikasi Penelitian, 12(02).
3. Yuliyanti, T. (2015). Kemampuan Metakognitif, Lingkungan Dan Motivasi Belajar Meningkatkan Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Poltekkes Bhakti Mulia. IJMS – Indonesian Journal on Medical Science, 2(1).
4. Syarif, H. (2014). Soft skill mahasiswa keperawatan universitas syiah kuala pada kurikulum berbasis kompetensi dan pendekatan lecturing 2011. Idea Nursing Journal, 5(1).
5. Forneris, S. G., & Peden-McAlpine, C. J. (2006). Contextual learning: A reflective learning intervention for nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 3(1).
6. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574.
7. Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2008). To tutor the tutor: Adaptive domain support for peer tutoring. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer.
8. Lentell, H. (2004). The importance of the tutor in open and distance learning. In Rethinking Learner Support in Distance Education (pp. 76–88). Routledge.
9. Maudsley, G. (1999). Roles and responsibilities of the problem-based learning tutor in the undergraduate medical curriculum. BMJ – British Medical Journal, 318(7184), 657.
10. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. (2008). Tutor learning: The role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science, 36(4), 321–350.
11. Matsuda, N., Cohen, W. W., Koedinger, K. R., Keiser, V., Raizada, R., Yarzebinski, E., et al. (2012). Studying the effect of tutor learning using a teachable agent that asks the student tutor for explanations. In DIGITEL 2012 – IEEE Fourth International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning. IEEE.
12. Neville, A. J. (1999). The problem-based learning tutor: Teacher? Facilitator? Evaluator? Medical Teacher, 21(4), 393–401.
13. Aleven, V. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179.
14. Andini, D. W. (2016). “Differentiated Instruction” solusi pembelajaran dalam keberagaman siswa di kelas inklusif. TRIHAYU Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-an, 2(3).
15. Darmawan, D. (2014). Inovasi Pendidikan: Pendekatan Praktik Teknologi Multimedia dan Pembelajaran Online. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
16. Rowntree, D. (1995). Teaching and learning online: A correspondence education for the 21st century? British Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 205–215.
17. Shymansky, J. A. (1992). Using constructivist ideas to teach science teachers about constructivist ideas, or teachers are students too! Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(2), 53–57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
