Level of Technology Acceptance and Factors That Influences the Use of MOOC at Public Universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/kh9fsv40Keywords:
MOOC, Technology Acceptance,, , Smart PLS,, Lifelong Learning, Distance EducationAbstract
The aim of these studies is to investigate the acceptance level of MOOC and factors that might influence the use of MOOC at Public Universities. A quantitative technique which is a survey method was conducted at the selected public university where data were collected from 400 respondents. The analysis was then conducted by using Smart PLS software. Meanwhile, the Technology Acceptance Model was implemented as to obtain the findings of this study. The results showed that effort performance, social influence, facilitating condition, interest, motivation and course design are factors influencing MOOC usage among students at the particular university. The findings also show that the acceptance level of MOOC learning at this particular university was substantial due to some factors might influence the usage and encouragement of these technologies. The result also shows that there is an area of improvement in term of MOOC learning at these universities in order to make the technologies useful and can be beneficial for long term sight and lifelong learning especially in the context of distance education.
Downloads
References
[1] Abu-Shanab, E. A., & Musleh, S. (2018). The adoption of massive open online courses: Challenges and benefits. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 13(4), 62-76.
[2] Ain, N., & Liza, R. (2018). Kesediaan Penggunaan Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sijil Pengoperasian Perniagaan Kolej Komuniti Ledang. International Conference on Global Education VI, pp. 1932-1942.
[3] Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., & Jakobs, H. (2014). The state of MOOCs from 2008 to 2014: A critical analysis and future visions. International Conference on Computer Supported Education, pp. 305-327.
[4] Al-Shami, S. A., Sedik, S., Rashid, N., & Hussin, H. (2018). An empirical analysis of MOOC adoption from the perspective of institutional theory. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10(6), 332-343.
[5] Daud, M. Y., Zulkifli, F. N., Rahman, M. J. A., & Khalid, F. (2017). Kesediaan Pelajar Siswazah Menggunakan MOOC dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Seminar Pendidikan Serantau ke-VIII, pp. 636– 651.
[6] Fadzil, M., Latif, L. A., & Azzman, T. A. M. T. M. (2015). MOOCs in Malaysia: A preliminary case study. MOOCs in Malaysia: A preliminary case study. E-ASEM Forum: Renewing the Lifelong Learning Agenda for the Future, pp. 1–17.
[7] Fianu, E., Blewett, C., Ampong, G. O. A., & Ofori, K. S. (2018). Factors affecting MOOC usage by students in selected Ghanaian universities. Education Sciences, 8(2), 1-15.
[8] Hamdan, A., Din, R., Manaf, S. Z. A., Salleh, N. S. M., & Kamsin, I. F. (2015). Pendidikan: Satu Ulasan Sistematik (UTAUT Applications in the field of Education: A Systematic Review). Journal of Advanced Review on Scientific Research, 5(1), 10-29.
[9] Haron, H., Yusof, A. R. M., Samad, H., Ismail, N., Juanita, A., & Yusof, H. (2019). The Platform of MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) on Open Learning: Issues and Challenges. International Journal of Modern Eduction, 1(3), 1-9.
[10] Henseler, J. (2017). Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178-192.
[11] Raman, A., Don, Y., Khalid, R., Hussin, F., Fauzee, O., Sofian, M., & Ghani, M. (2014). Technology acceptance on smart board among teachers in Terengganu using UTAUT model. Asian Social Science, 10(11), 84-91.
[12] Koçdar, S., Okur, M., & Bozkurt, A. (2017). An Examination of xMOOCs: An Embedded Single Case Study Based on Conole's 12 Dimensions. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 52-65.
[13] Mohamad, M., & Rahim, M. K. I. A. (2018). Factors Affecting MOOCs Continuance Intention in Malaysia: A Proposed Conceptual Framework. Journal of Humanities, Language, Culture and Business, 2(7), 1268147.
[14] Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376.
[15] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
