Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale as a Dystopian Novel

Authors

  • Daisy Priya Gogoi The Department of English, Affiliated toc Dibrugarh University. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/j4gzet83

Keywords:

dystopia, freedom, handmaids, sex, rights

Abstract

The dystopian world is a nightmare for anyone who lives through it or encounters experiences related to such a society. There is no individual freedom, right to privacy, freedom of speech or even thought. People become pawns in the hands of an autocratic system which rules the lives of the people. Any voice raised against such a society is silenced by brutal violence or death. The system rules not only through political power, but ideologies as well. They condition the people through educational institutions and Churches in the attempt to make the tyranny seem natural. Women suffer the worst. They have no right over their bodies or their children. Indeed, the people are kept so terrified and vulnerable that they never rebel against the injustices committed against them by the government in power. Such a horrific and hopeless society is presented by Margaret Atwood in her novel The Handmaid’s Tale. The tale narrates the tale of Offred, who is forced to leave her family and work as, in every sense, as a sex slave. She, like the other handmaids, are treated as mere baby producing machines and have no right over their privacy. Through the character of Offred, Atwood reveals the dangers of exploiting one’s own rights, thinking they are for granted and warns her readers of a world of dystopia. My paper, in this respect, aims to explore the themes used by Atwood in The Handmaid’s Tale to elevate it to the level of dystopia. It also analyzes the various episodes and instances of dystopia presented in the novel.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adams, John Joseph. “Dystopian fiction: An Introduction”.Tor.com.N.pg https://www.tor.com/2011/04/11/dystopian-fiction-an-introduction Accessed on 3rd May, 2019

2. Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. Vintage Books, 1996. Print.

3. “Dystopian”. Book series, recap and reviews. Npag https://www.bookseriesrecaps.com/tag/dystopian/ Accessed on 4th May, 2019

4. Feuer, Lois. “The Calculous of Love and Nightmare: The Handmaid’s Tale and the Dystopian

5. Tradition”. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol 38, 1997, pp 83-95.

6. Kuznicki, Slawomir. Margaret Atwood's Dystopian Fiction: Fire Is Being Eaten. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017. Print.

7. Mirzayee, Mitra. “Female Identity in The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood”. World Scientific News: An International Scientific Journal. Faculty of Humanities. Semnan University. Iran, 2019.

8. Petterson, Fredrik. “Discourse and Oppression in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale”. School of Languages and Literature/English. Linnaeus University. Sweden, 2010. Print.

9. “Representations of Nature in Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake”, International Journal of English and Literature (IJEL), Vol. 4, Issue 6, pp. 25-32

10. “Discontented Female Body and the Alienated Self in Margaret Atwood’s Lady Oracle”, International Journal of English and Literature (IJEL), Vol. 6, Issue 6, pp. 113-116

11. “Poetic Vision of Pablo Neruda”, International Journal of Linguistics and Literature (IJLL), Vol. 4, Issue 1,

pp. 33-38

12. “Postcolonial Feminism in Margaret Atwood's Fiction”, Postcolonial Feminism in Margaret Atwood's Fiction (IJLL), Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 11-28

13. “Storytelling as a Panacea to Gender Exploitation in Margaret Atwood’s The Blind Assassin and The Robber Bride”, IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL), Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp. 13-16

14. “Gender Performances in Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman”, BEST: International Journal of Humanities, Arts, Medicine and Sciences (BEST: IJHAMS), Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 147- 156

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Gogoi, D. P. (2020). Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale as a Dystopian Novel. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 4721-4727. https://doi.org/10.61841/j4gzet83