The Use of Hedges in Females Versus Males Speeches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/csyv4d35Keywords:
Sociolinguistics, Hedges, pragmatic particles,, , women’s language,, impromptu speech.Abstract
This sociolinguistic study aims at investigating the linguistic concept of hedges from a sociolinguistic point of view where it manifests a comparison between the types and frequency of hedges used by males and the types and frequency of hedges used by females in a certain spoken task attributed to them in a procedural classroom work. The procedure was through recording and calculating the types and number of hedging expressions used by each group. The corpus supplying data for this study is chosen from university students. The participants were randomly selected from a fourth year university students group of different majors who study English language as a first foreign language and it is considered one of the credited subjects besides the essential subjects in their majors. A body of 36 speeches were analyzed by the researcher for the number and types of hedges used. The speeches were separated into two equal groups. Females speeches 18 / Males speeches 18. The results indicate that females are more inclined toward using hedges in their speeches than males. This study also recommends that hedges be given more attention for their benefit for language enrichment in student speeches, especially when used in argumentation and persuasion due to the adequate linguistic and rhetorical role they perform.
Downloads
References
Brown, G. (1977). Listening to spoken English. London: Longman. Coates, J. (1986). Women, men and Language. London: Longman.
Crystal, D. Davy, D. (1975). Advanced conversational English. London: Longman. Edmondson, W. (1981). Spoken Discourse. London: Longman.
Holmes, J. (1984). Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures, 2, 59-79.
Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in Science Research Article.
Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in Scientific Research Articles.
Applied Linguistics, 17, 433-454.
Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hyland, K. (1995). The author in the text: Hedging Scientific Writing. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching 18, 33-42.
James, A.R. (1983). Compromisers in English: a cross-disciplinary approach to their interpersonal significance. Journal of Pragmatics 7,191-206.
Lakoff, R. (1972). The pragmatics of modality. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers 8, 229,246.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and the women’s place. New York: Harper & Row.
Ostman, J.O. (1981). ‘you know’: a discourse functional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s B.V.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2000). Hedging and positivism. English for specific purposes, 19(2),
175-187.
Schourup, L.C (1985). Common discourse particles in English conversation. New York.
Garland Publishing co.
Selinker, L. (1979). On the use of informants in discourse analysis and language for specialized purposes. lral 17, 189-215.
Skelton, J. (1988). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT Journal, 42, 37-43.
Stockwell, P. (2002). Sociolinguistics, A resource book for students. Routledge: London and New York.
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich, Language in Society: 179-195.
Source of text 1: https://doi.org/101136/bmjj5855
Source of hedging expressions: Hedging Language Academic English UK. www.academic- englishuk.com/hedging.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
