The Language of F. D. Roosevelt’s ‘Pearl Harbour Address to the Nation’ Persuasive Call to Arms Discourse: A Rhetorical Criticism

Authors

  • Asst. Lect. Ghaidaa Fahmie Yousif Thi-Qar University/ College of Education for Humanities/ Department of English Author
  • Asst. Lect. Inas Malik Mnaathar General Directorate of Education, Iraq, Thi-Qar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/s1d94d21

Keywords:

Call to Arms Discourse,, Rhetoric, Politeness, Political Speeches

Abstract

The aim of this work is to analyze the representative speeches of F. D. Roosevelt with a view to getting some meaningful insight into the political oratory (call to arms) in general and of the speaker in particular. The focus of this work is on identifying various linguistic strategies used in 'Pearl Harbour Address to the Nation’ for realizing various persuasive strategies, intentions and sub-intentions. For doing so, a model of analysis has been developed to include Aristotelian and Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory. This is to understand F. D. Roosevelt’s rhetoric and politeness strategies, which they have used in persuading the masses and influencing their decisions. Hence, this work makes some meaningful observations about persuasive strategies and speech delivery styles of the said orator. In terms of findings, the analysis found that the major intention of the speech and speaker was to persuade the audience to change / affect their view or to take some action as intended by the orator (i.e., persuade the congress to declare war against Japan). Besides that, various strategies have been used to realize these sub/intentions. However, some of these strategies, intentions sub-intentions have been found interlinked, as they have mostly been found occurring together.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benwell, B. (1999) “The Organisation of Knowledge in British University Tutorial Discourse: Issues, Pedagogic Discourse Strategies and Disciplinary Identity”. In Pragmatics, 9 (4), (pp. 535- 565).

Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coulmas, F. (2005) Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers’ Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Foss, S. K. (1996) Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration & Practice (2nd ed.). Illinois: Waveland Press.

Fox, B. A. (1987) Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grote, B., E. Hagen, A. Stein & E. Teich (1997a). “Speech Production in Human- Machine Dialogue: A Natural Language Generation Perspective”. In E. Maier, M. Mast and S. Luperfoy (Eds.), Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems. (pp. 70-85). Berlin: Springer.

Grote, B., N. Lenke & M. Stede. (1997b) “Ma(r)king Concessions in English and German”. In Discourse Processes, 24, (pp. 87-117).

Katea, H. (2018). Understanding Discursive Persuasion in American and Iraqi Call to Arms Discourse: Discursive Strategies as Instruments of Persuasive Politics (Doctoral dissertation, Bangor University).

Kennedy, G. A (Trans.) (2007) Aristotle On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, (2nd Ed.) Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Leech, G. N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.

Long, J. (2011) “Critical Discourse Analysis of Roosevelt's Pearl Harbor Speech”. In

Journal of Kaili University, 4. Retrieved on 21 July 2020

< http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-QDNS201104035.htm> Mann, B. (1999) “An Introduction to Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST)”

Mann, W.C., & S.A. Thompson (1988) “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. In Text, 8 (3) (pp. 243-281).

Muralikrishnan.T.R (2011) “Critical Discourse Analysis: Politics and Verbal coding”.

In Language in India. Retrieved on 15th Feb. 2019 http://www.languageinindia.com/may2011/muralikrishnan.pdf

Roosevelt, F. D. (8th Dec.1941) “Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation” (Text and Speech) Retrieved on 12 Aug. 2019 www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/fdrpearlharbor.htm

Watts, R. J. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

31.07.2020

How to Cite

Yousif , G. F., & Mnaathar, I. M. (2020). The Language of F. D. Roosevelt’s ‘Pearl Harbour Address to the Nation’ Persuasive Call to Arms Discourse: A Rhetorical Criticism. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 8241-8254. https://doi.org/10.61841/s1d94d21