Interdisciplinary Integration in the Learning Process of Students in Humanities

Authors

  • Elvira V. Shachkova Design Humanities and Education Science Academy (branch) of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University in Yalta. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/3hke9614

Keywords:

interactivity, , Miniature Composition, Intuition, Intellect, Scientific Cognition,, Creative Project, Students, , Artist Teacher, Design, Methods of Activating the Creative Process

Abstract

The paper analyzes the process of interdisciplinary integration, learner-centered and interactive approach in teaching future teachers in humanities.

The aim of the work is to analyze the subject matter of synthesis and the process of integration, which consists of creative forces: artistic intuition and intellect of future humanitarians. The methods and results justify the importance of interdisciplinary integration in the learning process of students in humanities, which is considered leaning on individual and interactive approaches.

The essence of teacher's professional individuality lies in an efficient self-consciousness that includes a reasonable position of personality, internal system of abilities, harmony and integrity, continuous self-development and formation of a personality, acquisition of competencies and self-assertion, self-actualization and realization of individual value in personal and social factors.

In education, the professional individuality is described as a progressive phenomenon, multilevel system, or a personal life agenda. The subject matter of the interconnection between intuition and intellect in the scientific cognition of the existing reality is revealed. The authors also describe the methods promoting activation of creative activity are given.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Arnkheym, R. (2007). Iskusstvo i vizual'noe vospriyatie [Art and visual perception]. Moscow: Arkhitektura, 390p.

[2] Al'tshuller, G.S. (1988). Tvorchestvo kak tochnaya nauka [Creativity as an exact science]. Kazan: Izd-vo Kazan. kn-ta, 212p.

[3] Ayzekson, U. (2012). Stiv Dzhobs [Steve Jobs]. Moscow: Astrel', CORPUS, 704 p.

[4] Baskakov, A.Ya. & Tulenkov, N.V. (2002). Metodologiya nauchnogo issledovaniya [Scientificкesearch methodology]. Kiev: MAUP, 96–97.

[5] Beda, I.V. (1989). Osnovy izobrazitel'noy gramoty [Fundamentals of fine arts]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 192p.

[6] Blokh, O.A. (2015). Pedagogika i psikhologiya muzykal'nogo tvorchestva [Pedagogy and psychology of musical creativity]. Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet kul'tury i iskusstv, 156p.

[7] Varfolomeeva, T.P. (2008). Istoriya psikhologii [History of psychology]. Samara: SGPU, 152p.

[8] Vashchenko, G.A. (2000). Trudy po pedagogike i psikhologii [Works in pedagogy and psychology]. Moscow: Shkol'nik-Fada LTD, 192p.

[9] Gil'manov, S.A. (1996). Tvorcheskaya individual'nost' uchitelya [Teacher's creative individuality]. Moscow: Smysl, 43p.

[10] Grinenko, I.V. (2008). Pedagogicheskie usloviya razvitiya kreativnosti budushchikh uchiteley gumanitarnogo profilya v protsesse professional'noy podgotovki [Pedagogical conditions for the development of creativity in future teachers of humanities in the process of professional training]. Ternopol, 20p.

[11] Grushevsky, S.P. (2001). Pedagogika i psikhologiya vysshey shkoly [Pedagogy and psychology in higher school]. Krasnodar, 385p.

[12] Zimnyaya, I.A. (2004). Klyuchevye kompetentnosti kak rezul'tatno-tselevaya osnova kompetentnostnogo podkhoda v obrazovanii [Key competencies as a result target basis of competence approach in education]. Moskcow: Issledovatel'skiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 40p.

[13] Kondakov, N.I. (1975). Logicheskiy slovar'-spravochnik [Reference dictionary in logic]. Moscow: Nauka, 415.

[14] Kraevskyб V.V. (2000). Metodologiya pedagogicheskoy nauki [Pedagogical science ethodology]. Moscow:

Dashkov i K', 82

[15] Kuzin, V.S. (2005). Psikhologiya zhivopisi: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov [Painting psychology: university coursebook]. Moscow: Oniks 21 vek, 304p.

[16] Levit, S.Ya. (1998). Kul'turologiya 20 vek [Culturology of XX century]. Sankt-Peterburg: Univerkniga,

114.

[17] Nazarova, N.M. (1998). Ponyatie integratsiya v spetsial'noy pedagogike [Concept of "integration" in special pedagogy]. Ekaterinburg, 262p.

[18] Nemensky, B.M. (1987). Mudrost' krasoty [Wisdom of beauty]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 255p.

[19] Nesterenko, V.V. (2012). Sushchnost' i zadaniya lichnostno-orientirovannogo podkhoda v obrazovanii [Essence and tasks of the student-centered approach in education]. Moscow: Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 15p.

[20] Petrenko, M.A. (2016). Interaktivnaya tekhnologiya razvitiya tvorcheskoy aktivnosti [Interactive technology for the development of creative activity]. Cheboksary: TSNS "Interaktiv plyus", 50p.

[21] Rostovtsev, N.N. (1995). Akademicheskiy risunok [Academic drawing]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 239p.

[22] Rubinshteyn, S.L. (2007). Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology]. Sankt- Peterburg: Piter, 713p.

[23] Ushinsky, K.D. (1954). Izbrannye pedagogicheskie sochineniya [Collected works in pedagogy]. Moskva: Uchpedgiz, 735p.

[24] Chaplygina, O.V. (2003). Pedagogicheskie usloviya razvitiya tvorcheskoy individual'nosti studentov [Pedagogical conditions for the development of creative individuality in students]. Kursk, 163p.

[25] Shorokhov, E.V. (1979). Osnovy kompozitsii [Basics in composition]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 303p.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Shachkova, E. V. (2020). Interdisciplinary Integration in the Learning Process of Students in Humanities. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 6229-6242. https://doi.org/10.61841/3hke9614