Flexural Creep Performance of Pre-cracked Kenaf Bio Fibrous Concrete Composite Subjected to Sustained Bending Loading

Authors

  • Ezekiel Babatunde OGUNBODE Department of Building, School of Environmental Technology, Federal University of Technology Minna, Niger State, Nigeria Author
  • Yakubu Aminu DODO Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Engineering, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul Turkey. Department of Research and Development, Wood Expo Nigeria, Asokoro, Abuja – Nigeria Author
  • Aliyu ABDUL Department of Civil Engineering, Niger State Polytechnic, Zungeru, Niger State, Nigeria Author
  • David OYERINDE Department of Civil Engineering, Niger State Polytechnic, Zungeru, Niger State, Nigeria Author
  • Abbas Sa'id EL-NAFATY Department of Architecture, Faculty of Environmental Technology, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University Bauchi, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/zy0pf366

Keywords:

Fibrous Concrete, Flexural Creep, KBFCC, Kenaf fibre, Pre-Cracked

Abstract

Fibre inclusion in fresh concrete mix is meant to enhance the residual strength and ductility of the concrete element. Currently, structural applications of fibrous concrete composites remain relatively scarce, as their time-dependent behavior is still poorly understood. This paper presents the possible usage and experimental campaign regarding the flexural creep of cracked Kenaf bio-fibrous concrete composite (KBFCC). In the test setup, prismatic plain and fibrous concrete specimens were considered, and the concrete material is characterized according to the ASTM and BSEN standards. Also, the samples were pre-cracked to localize the creep deformations and for in-service simulation. The PC and KBFCC specimens were subjected to a sustained bending load, whereby two different load levels (25% and 35%) with respect to the individual residual post-crack flexural strength are considered at 7 and 28 days loading age. The experimental studies revealed that cracked KBFCC shows less creep compared to fiberless concrete, and the magnitude of sustained load level and loading age are the major sources of the creep behavior. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Mohammadhosseini H, Abdul Awal ASM, Mohd Yatim JB. The impact resistance and mechanical properties of concrete reinforced with waste polypropylene carpet fibers. Constr Build Mater 2017; 143:147–57.

[2] Ogunbode EB, Jamaludin MY, Yunus IM, Hamid HA, Azmahani AA, Masoud R. Compressive Creep of Kenaf Bio-Fibrous Concrete Composite Under One-Dimensional Stressing. Malaysian J Civ Eng 2016; 28:

279–89.

[3] Babafemi AJ, Boshoff WP. Tensile Creep of Macro-Synthetic Fibre Reinforced Concrete (MSFRC) under

Uni-axial tensile loading. Cem Concr Compos 2015; 55: 62–9.

[4] García-Taengua E, Arango S, Martí-Vargas J. Flexural Creep of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete in the

Cracked State. Build Mater 2014.

[5] Fládr J, Vodička J, Krátký J. Methodology of Measuring of Creep of Concrete Specimen Reinforced with

Polymer fibers. In: Barros, et al., editors. 8th RILEM Int. Symp. Fibre Reinf. Concr. Challenges Oppor.

(BEFIB 2012), UM, Guimarães: RILEM; 2012, p. 571–80.

[6] Ramaswamy HS, Ahuja BM, Krishnamoorthy S. Behaviour of Concrete Reinforced with Jute, Coir and

Bamboo Fibers. Int J Cem Compos Light Concr 1983;5:3–13.

[7] Elsaid A, Dawood M, Seracino R, Bobko C. Mechanical properties of kenaf fiber reinforced concrete.

Constr Build Mater 2011; 25: 1991–2001.

[8] Ali M, Liu A, Sou H, Chouw N. Mechanical and Dynamic Properties of Coconut Fibre Reinforced

Concrete. Constr Build Mater 2012;30:814–25.

[9] Ogunbode EB, Jamaludin MY, Ishak MY, Meisam R, Masoud R, Norazura MA. Preliminary Investigation

of Kenaf Bio Fibrous Concrete Composites. 2nd Int. Conf. Sci. Eng. Soc. Sci. (ICSESS ’16). Univ. Teknol.

Malaysia, 2016, p. 248–9.

[10] Hasan NS, Sobuz HR, Auwalu AS, Tamanna N. Investigation into the Suitability of Kenaf Fibre to Produce

Structural Concrete. Adv Mater Lett 2015.

[11] Lam TF, Jamaludin MY. Mechanical Properties of Kenaf Fibre Reinforced Concrete with Different Fibre

Content and Fiber Length. J Asian Concr Fed 2015;1:11–21.

[12] Ogunbode EB, Jamaludin MY, Ishak MY, Razavi M. Creep Performance of Kenaf Bio Fibrous Concrete

Composite Under Uniaxial Compression. 11th Int. Semin. Civ. Eng. Res.—The 1st Int. Symp. Expert. Eng.

Des. (SEPKA-ISEED’16), Univ. Teknol. Malaysia, 2016, p. 10–9.

[13] Vajje S, Krishna NR. Study on addition of the natural fibers into concrete. Int J Sci Technol Res 2013; 2:

213–8.

[14] Arango S, Serna P, Martí-Vargas J. A test method to characterize flexural creep behaviour of pre-cracked

FRC specimens. Experimental 2012.

[15] Fládr J, Broukalová I. Testing the Long-Term Flexural Behavior of FRC with Synthetic Fibers. Adv Mater

Res 2015;1106:136–9.

[16] Cochrane JT. Flexural creep behavior of fiber-reinforced concrete under high temperatures. Dalhousie

University, Halifax, 2003.

[17] Ranaivomanana N, Multon S, Turatsinze A. Tensile, compressive and flexural basic creep of concrete at

different stress levels. Cem Concr Res 2013;52:1–10.

[18] Swamy RN, Theodorakopoulos DD. Flexural creep behavior of fiber-reinforced cement composites. Int J

Cem Compos 1979;1:37–49.

[19] Kurtz S, Balaguru P. Postcrack creep of polymeric fiber-reinforced concrete in flexure. Cem Concr Res

2000;30:183–90.

[20] IJSG. The International Jute Study Group 2004. http://www.jute.org/ (accessed June 16, 2017).

[21] Mostofa MG, Rahman L, Hussain MM. Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Contributing Characters in

Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Bangladesh J Pl Breed Genet 2011;24:1–6.

[22] Ogunbode EB, Jamaludin MY, Ishak MY, Razavi M, Razavi M. Potential of Kenaf fibre in composite

production: A review. J Teknol 2015;77:23–30.

[23] Izran K, Mohd Zharif T, Beyer G, Mohamad Jani S, Noor Azrieda AR, Yanti AKa. Kenaf For

Biocomposite: An Overview. J Sci Technol 2014;6:41–66.

[24] FAO. The production and consumption of kenaf in China. Consultation on natural fibers. Food Agric

Organ ESC-Fibers Consult No. 03/6 2003.

[25] MacKay J. Behavior of steel and synthetic fiber reinforced concrete under flexural creep loading.

University of Dalhousie, Canada, 2002.

[26] Arango S, García-Taengua E, Martí-Vargas JR, Serna-Ros P. A Comprehensive Study on the Effect of Fibers and Loading on Flexural Creep of SFRC. In: Joaquim Barros et al., editor. 8th RILEM Int. Symp. Fibre Reinf. Concr. BEFIB 2012, Guimarães: 2012, p. 173–4.

[27] Boshoff WP. Time-Dependent Behavior of Engineered Cement-Based Composites 2007; Ph.D. Thesis:182.

[28] ASTM C 143. Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete. 2003.

[29] BS 1881 103: Testing concrete. Method for determination of compacting factor. 1993.

[30] BS EN 12350-3. Testing fresh concrete. Vebe test. 2009.

[31] BS EN 12390-3. Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. 2009.

[32] ASTM C 496. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.

[33] ASTM C293 / C293M. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam With Center-Point Loading). 2016:1–4.

[34] Zerbino RL BB. Long-term behavior of cracked steel fiber-reinforced concrete beams under sustained loading. ACI Mater J 2012;109:215–224.

[35] Lam TF, Jamaludin MY. The Effects of Fiber Content and Fiber Length on the Mechanical Properties of Kenaf Fibrous Concrete. 6th Int. Conf. Asian Concr. Fed., 21-24 September, 2014, Seoul, Korea: 2014.

[36] Ogunbode EB., Egba E.I., Olaiju O.A., Johnson C.N., Amusuk D.J., Dodo Y.A. Determining the properties of green laterized concrete with fly ash for sustainable solid waste management, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2018, 63, 649-654.

[37] ACI 318M-05. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Michigan: 2005.

Downloads

Published

31.07.2020

How to Cite

Babatunde OGUNBODE, E., Aminu DODO, Y., ABDUL, A., OYERINDE, D., & Sa'id EL-NAFATY, A. (2020). Flexural Creep Performance of Pre-cracked Kenaf Bio Fibrous Concrete Composite Subjected to Sustained Bending Loading. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 5527-5544. https://doi.org/10.61841/zy0pf366