Integration of Metacognition and CLIL in the First Year Engineering Classes – A Study

Authors

  • R. Gomathy Kongu Engineering College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/rncag460

Keywords:

Metacognition, Reading Strategies, MARSI Questionnaire,, Scaffolding, CLIL

Abstract

A huge number of research have been made on reading strategies as it is considered as an active process to gather new information from any sort of content. Among the various strategies, metacognition (Flavell, 1985) (thinking about thinking) and its strategies is one of the processes to make reading a self regulatory learning. In this regard, general survey has been made among the first year engineering students to learn about their reading strategies. From the survey made, it is understood that they find difficult to make them comfortable and feel monotonous to do a prolonged reading and it is also understood that they are not aware of the reading strategies as they have not been encouraged to do reading from their childhood. So the researchers propose to make an analysis to find out their awareness about the strategies of Metacognition with the help of the MARSI Questionnaire (Kouider Mokhtari and Carla Reichard, 2002). Such an analysis is made to help the learners to know the metacognitive strategies which would act as Scaffolding (Vygotsky, 1978) to develop their autonomous learning to enhance their proficiency in English. The paper also gives various strategies to integrate Metacognition with CLIL in the reading classes.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Afflerbach. P., Pearson, P.D., & Paris, S.G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61, 364-373.

[2] Anderson, N.J. 1999. Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies. Toronto: Heinle & Heinle.

[3] BAKER, L. (2002) „Metacognitive comprehension instruction‟, in I. C. C. Blocka, M. Pressley (Eds.) Comprehension Instruction: Research- Based Best Practices New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 77–95.

[4] Carrell, P.L., L. Gajalusek and T. Wise, 1998. Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. Instructional Science.

26: 97-112.

[5] Carrell, P.L. 1998. Introduction. In Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading, ed. P.L. Carrell,

J. Derine and D.E. Heskey, 1-5 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[6] Chamot, A., Barnhardt, S, El-Dinary, P. & Robbins, J. (1999). The Learning Strategies Handbook. New York: Pearson Education. Longman.

[7] COYLE, D., HOOD, P., & MARSH, D. (2010). CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[8] Flavell, J.H. (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.

[9] FLAVELL, J. H. (1976) „Metacognitive aspects of problem solving‟, in L. B. Resnick (Ed.) The Nature of Intelligence Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[10] FLAVELL, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluve (Eds.) Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. Hillsdale: NJ, Erlbaum.

[11] Hajduzita Wiwczaroski & Ildiko (2010) CLIL: Preparing for Central Asian Students to Study Animal Husbandry In English., English for Specific Purposes World, Volume 9, Issue 29.

[12] MEYER, O. (2010). Towards quality CLIL: successful planning and teaching strategies. Pulso, 33, 11-29.

[13] SCHREIBER, F. J. (2005). Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Literacy. In Israek, S. E., Block, C. C., Bauserman, K. L. & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (Eds.), Metacognition in Literacy Learning. Theory, Assessment, Instruction and Professional Development. (215–240). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

[14] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[15] https://www.nwfsc.edu/wp-content/ uploads/2017/10/Marsi-test.pdf

[16] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326152721_Revising_the_Metacognitive_Awareness_of_Readin g_Strategies_Inventory_MARSI_and_testing_for_factorial_invariance

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Gomathy , R. (2020). Integration of Metacognition and CLIL in the First Year Engineering Classes – A Study. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 5084-5089. https://doi.org/10.61841/rncag460