ISSUES OF IMPROVEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN: NATIONAL AND FOREIGN PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/tjj3vv71Keywords:
administrative body, administrative dispute, individual, legal entity, , the person concerned, administrative court,, administrative procedures, public administration,, complaint,, administrative document, administrative processAbstract
Administrative disputes arising in the relations of public administration between administrative body and the person are common in every state of the world. The administrative dispute resolution system is known as the "Administrative Justices" in theoretical and legal documents. However, the system of administrative justices has its own peculiarities in each country. Prompt, transparent and open implementation of the system serves to promote human rights in that country. Corruption that is rampant in some countries today can be prevented as a result of the perfect implementation of this system.
Downloads
References
1. Baron S.A.Korf. Administrative justice in Russia. S. Petersburg. 2007.p. 87
2. G.T.Hakimov. Problems of Development of Administrative Justice in Uzbekistan. Monograph. T .: Publishing house of Tashkent State University Of Law, 2009. p.125.
3. J.Nematov. Improvement of Administrative Procedures in the Republic of Uzbekistan: Fundamentals of Administrative Law: A Comparative-Legal Analysis: Textbook- Vol: 2015.p.32.
4. Starilov Y.N. Administrative proceedings and administrative courts in the Russian Federation: reality and prospects // Russian judge, 2012. No. 2. His own. Administrative Justice Theory, history, perspectives. M .: Norm, 2001.p.304.
23 Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Statistical data of Administrative Courts for the 1st half of 2018
24 Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Statistical data of Administrative Courts for the 1st half of 2018
25A.Lukasheva. Human rights. Moscow, 1999. P. 103.
5. Belsky K.S. Questions on the subject of administrative law// GiP, 1997. - No. 11. - P. 20-21.
6. M Adler, ‘A Socio-Legal Approach to Administrative Justice’ (2003) 25 Law and Policy 323-324 and M. Adler, ‘Understanding and Analysing Administrative Justice’ in M. Adler (ed), Administrative Justice in Context (Hart 2010) 129.
7. StarilovYu.N. Administrative Justice Theory, history, perspectives. - M., 2001 .-- P. 68.
8. Sukhareva N.V. The essence of administrative disputes //Lawyer, 1999. - No. 10. - P. 52.
9. National Database of information of legislation, dated 03.01.2018, 03/18/457/0525
10. J. Nematov. Improvement of Administrative Procedures in the Republic of Uzbekistan: Administrative and Legal Framework: Comparative-Legal Analysis: Textbook-T .;2015.P.86.
11. Ya. Tsiko. Fundamentals of legislation on administrative procedures in Germany. Public Law Yearbook 2014.-M. p.365
12. Davydov K.V. The principles of administrative procedures: comparative legal research // Actual issues of public law.- 2015. No. 4 (34). P. 18.
13. Lars Broker. Inquisition principle in administrative procedure. Public Law Yearbook 2018. The principles of administrative procedures and administrative proceedings.-M. p.16
14. Bogdandi A. von, Huber P.M. State, public administration and administrative law in Germany // Digest of Public Law. 2014. No. 1 (3). P. 46.
15. Moshe Cohen-Elia, IddoPorat. The American method of weighing interests and the German test of proportionality: historical roots // Comparative Constitutional Review. 2011. No 3 (82). P.61.
16. I.A. Khamedov, I.M. Tsai. Institute of Administrative Procedures in the Light of the Reform of Administrative Procedure Law in Uzbekistan. Public Law Yearbook 2014: “Administrative Law: Comparative Legal Approaches”. - M.: Infotropic Media, 2014. p. 395-397.
17. Code of Administrative Procedure Germany // Collection of legislative acts on administrative court proceedings. 3rd edition. - M.: Info-tropic Media, 2018.P.191
18. Code of Administrative Justice (Legislative Part) (as of July 2013) (in French) //https://www.legislationline.org/topics/topic/83/country/30
19. I.Alimov. Judicial practice on administrative cases. - Tashkent. “Complex Print”, 2018. Page 6
20. Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Statistical data of Administrative Courts for the 1st half of 2018
21. Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Statistical data of Administrative Courts for the 1st half of 2018
22. A.Lukasheva. Human rights. Moscow, 1999. P.103.
23. Shan, L. Consciousness is an entity with entangled states: Correlating the measurement problem with non- local consciousness (2018) NeuroQuantology, 16 (7), pp. 70-78.
24. Majumdar, S., Roy, S. Relevance of quantum mechanics in bacterial communication (2018) NeuroQuantology, 16 (3), pp. 1-6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
