A STEP TOWARDS UNDERSTANDING AND IMPLEMENTING LITERATURE REVIEW IN RESEARCH PAPER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ezxbcg51Keywords:
: Literature searching, Writing a review, Literature reviewAbstract
Composing writing in a research paper is a combination of the pre or post-capability. It will require to attempt a writing survey, either as a feature of a course of study, as a critical advance in the exploration procedure. A writing survey can be only a straightforward synopsis of the sources, yet it ordinarily has an authoritative example and joins both the outline and union of the available materials. It requests a scope of aptitudes, for example, figuring out how to characterize subjects for investigation, gaining abilities of writing looking and recovery, building up the capacity to break down and blend information just as getting adroit at composing and detailing, regularly inside a restricted time scale. The point of this research is to introduce a bit by bit way to deal with composing a writing survey look into the paper to encourage understudy and fledgeling analysts' understanding.
Keywords; ;
Downloads
References
1. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A Literature and Practice Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65: 42-56.
2. Carnwell, R., & Daly, W. (2001). Strategies for the Construction of a Critical Review of the Literature.
3. Colling, J (2003). Demystifying the Clinical Nursing Research Process: The Literature Review. UrolNurs23
(4): 297–9.
4. Cooper, H. M. (1988). The Structure of Knowledge Synthesis. Knowledge in Society, 1: 104-126.
5. Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1):38-43.
6. Faigley L& Witte SP (1981). Analyzing revision. Colleges Composition and Communication. 32:400-14.
7. Flower LS, Hayes JR, Carey L, Schriver KS, Stratman J (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication. 37(1):16-55.
8. Hall, T., Beecham, S., Bowes, D., Gray, D., &Counsell, S. (Ed.). A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Prediction Performance in Software Engineering.
9. Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review. London: Sage Publications.
10. Hayes JR. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.
11. Levy CM, Ransdell SE, editors. The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996. P.1-28.
12. Hess DR. How to Write an Effective Discussion. Respiratory Care. 2004; 29(10):1238-41
13. Hofmann AH. Scientific Writing and Communication. Papers, Proposals, and Presentations. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
14. Galvan, J. L. (2006). Writing literature reviews. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
15. Lawrence, C. N. (2011). Writing a Literature Review in the Social Sciences. Retrieved from www.academic.edu.
16. Martínez I (2005). Native and non-native writers' use of first-person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2005; 14(3):174-90.
17. Okoli, C., &Schabram, K. (2010). A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26).
18. Penrose, A.M. &Katz, S.B (1998). Writing in the Sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1998.
19. Rodman L (1994). The Active Voice in Scientific Articles: Frequency And Discourse Functions. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 1994; 24(3):309-31.
20. Sally. (2013). A Synthesis Matrix as a Tool for Analyzing and Synthesizing Prior Research. Retrieved from http://www.academiccoachingandwriting.org/dissertation-doctor/dissertation-doctor-blog iii-a-synthesis- matrix-as-a-tool-for-analyzing-and-synthesizing-prior-research.
21. San Jose State University (ed.) Guidelines for Writing a Review of Literature Retrieved from https://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/christen/review_guidelines.html.
22. Silvia, P.J (2007). How to Write a Lot. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Single, PB (2010). Demystifying Dissertation Writing: A Streamlined Process of Choice of Topic to Final Text. Virginia: Stylus Publishing LLC; 2010.
24. Soto D., Funes M.J., Guzmán-García A., Warbrick T., Rotshtein P.,& Humphreys GW (2009). Pleasant music overcomes the loss of awareness in patients with visual neglect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.106(14):6011-6.
25. Swales, J.M. & Feak, C.B (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students. 2nd edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26. Tarone L.E., Dwyer S., Gillette S.,& Icke V. (1998). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers with extensions to other languages and other fields. English for Specific Purposes. 17:113-32.
27. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (nd.). The Writing Center, Literature Review. Retrieved from https://writingcenter.unc.edu/files/2012/09/Literature-Reviews-The-Writing-
28. Timmins, F., & McCabe, C. (2005). How to conduct an effective literature review. Nurs Stand, 20 (11): 417.
29. USC Libraries. (ed.) Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper. Retrieved from http://libguides.usc.edu/writringguide/literaturereview.
30. Whitesides GM. Whitesides’ Group: Writing a Paper. Advance Mater. 2004; 16(15):1375-7.
31. Young BR. Can You Proofread This? In: Rafoth B, editor. A Tutor’s Guide: Helping Writers One to One. Portsmouth, NH: Boyn- ton/Cook Publishers; 2005. p. 140-58.
32. Younger, P. (2004). Using the internet to conduct a literature search. Nurs Stand 19 (6): 45-51
33. Zeiger, M (2000). Essentials of Writing Biomedical Research Papers. 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
34. M. Pradeep, R. Abinya S. Sathya Anandhi and S. Soundarya. "Dynamic Smart Alert Service for Women Safety System." International Journal of Communication and Computer Technologies 5 (2017), 58-
66. doi:10.31838/ijccts/05.02.05
35. Castro-Chavez, F.Most used codons per amino acid and per genome in the code of man compared to other organisms according to the rotating circular genetic code (2011) NeuroQuantology, 9 (4), pp. 747-767.
36. Keen, J.S.The mind, intergalactic space, and phi (2011) NeuroQuantology, 9 (4), pp. 649-659.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
