Rule of Darā' and Doubt about Expediency in the Enforcement of Criminal Judgments

Authors

  • Abdolamir Dayani Najaf Abadi Department of Divinity, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, NajafAbad, Iran Author
  • Ahamdreza Tavakoli Department of Divinity, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, NajafAbad, Iran Author
  • Mohsen ShekarchiZadeh Department of Low, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, NajafAbad, Iran Author
  • Mohammad Hadi Mahdavi Department of Low, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, NajafAbad, Iran Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/tchbh452

Keywords:

Doubt, expediency, criminal judgments, Hudud, retaliation in kind, monetary compensation, discretionary punishment, darā

Abstract

The effect of doubt and expediency on the enforcement of criminal judgments has long been considered by the early and late jurisprudents, and contemporary jurists and jurisprudents have also discussed it in their jurisprudential and legal books. The issue of doubt that has been raised in the rule of darā' is a common rule and is taken from the text and is widely used in criminal judgments, including Hudud (prescribed punishment), Qisas (retaliation in kind), and Ta’zir (discretionary punishment). It is also considered among the rules agreed by the five Islamic religions. Although famous jurisprudents believe that the provisions of this rule can be used in errors of fact (doubt about facts), according to the acceptance of this rule, which is taken from narratives, it can also be applied to errors of law (doubt about law). In criminal law, doubt is sometimes about the legal element, i.e., legislative decree, and sometimes it is about the spiritual element, or actus reus (wrongful act), which is the same as doubt about the realization of crime. The inclusion of the rule has also been accepted in these cases. On the other hand, “expediency” is also effective in enforcing criminal judgments, even Hudud, and can cause delay, change, and even stop the enforcement of the judgment. It seems that error (or doubt) is also effective in the stage of enforcing criminal judgments and can stop the enforcement; that is, execution of a judgment where social justice is not fully implemented is a matter of error (or doubt). Thus, along with the errors of fact and law, we also have probability of mistake and reluctance, doubt of the judge and the accused, probability of repentance, and doubt about the enforcement of judgment, which are a new alternative to errors or doubts. In this study, semantic analysis of doubt and expediency in Islamic jurisprudence and the effect of doubt about expediency on criminal judgments, including Hudud, retaliation in kind, monetary compensation and discretionary punishment, have been addressed through a descriptive-analytical method 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Al-Auda, Abdul Qadir, Islamic criminal law, vol. 1, research by Al-Seyyed Muhammad Ismail al-Sadr, Tehran: Al-Be'sat Institute, Second Edition, 1982.

2. Al-Jaziri, Abdul Rahman, Jurisprudence in quadruple religions, vol. 5, Beirut, Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.

3. Al-Samawi al-Yamani, Muhammad, Al-Musu'a al-'Arabiyya fi al-Alfaz al-Zeddiyya val Shazarat alLughawiyyah, vol. 2, Beirut, Markaz al-Dirasat va al-Bohus, First Edition, 1989.

4. Al-Tarmadi, Muhammed bin Isa, Sunan of Tarmadi, vol. 2, research and description by Ahmad Muhammad Shaker, Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, 1974.

5. Al-Zarkeshi, Badr al-Din Muhammad ibn Bahador al-Shafi’I, Al-Mansur fi Qawaid al-Fiqhiyyah, vol. 2, Kuwait, Dar al-Kuwait lil Sahafat, Second Edition, 1985.

6. Ameli, Zayn al-Din bin Ali (Shahid Sani), Masalik al-Afham, vol. 2, Bita.

7. Ardebili, Seyyed Abdul Karim, Jurisprudence of Hudud (prescribed punishment) and Ta’zir (discretionary punishment), Qom, School of Amir al-Mu'minin (Dar al-Ilm al-Mufid), First Edition, 1993.

8. Bojnordi (Mousavi), Seyyed Mohammad, Jurisprudential Rules, Tehran: Mi’ad, Second Edition, 1993.

9. Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar, Dehkhoda Dictionary, vol. 4 & 12, Tehran: Tehran University, First Edition, new volume, 1994.

10. Farahidi, Khalil bin Ahmad, vol. 1 & 3, Qom: Dar al-Hijrah, Second Edition, 1989.

11. Fazel Lankarani, Muhammad, Tafsir al-Shari'a, Book al-Hudud, Qom: Moallef, First Edition, 1986.

12. Feyz, Ali Reza, Comparison in general Islamic criminal law, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance Publications, 2006.

13. Ghazzali, Muhammad, Al-Mustasfa min Ilm al-Usul, vol. 1, Beirut, Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.

14. Gorji, Abul Qasim, Legal Proceedings, vol. 1, Tehran: Tehran University Press, Second Edition, 1996.

15. Hemo, Foundations of Jurisprudence and Principles, Tehran: Tehran University Press, 2005.

16. Hemo, Jami' al-Masail, vol. 1, First Edition, 1996.17. Hilli, Ja'far ibn al-Hassan, Shara'i Al-Islam fi Masa'il al-Halal wal-Haram, vol. 4, Najaf: Matba'a al-Adab, 1969.

18. Holy Quran

19. Hurr Amili, Mohammad bin Hassan, Wasail al-Shia, vols. 12, 18, & 28, Qom, Al-Bayt Institute (AS), Third Edition, 1996.

20. Ibn Hazm, Abu Muhammad Ali, Al-Mahalli al-Asar, vol. 12, Beirut, Dar al-Fikr, Bita.

21. Ibn Homam, Kamal al-Din Muhammad, Fath al-Qadir, Bulaq Press, Al-Matba’a al-Yomniyyah, 1921.

22. Ibn Majah, Sunan of Ibn Majah, vol. 2, Muhammad Fu'ad 'Abdul Baqi 'Isa al-Babi, Matba'a al-Halabi, Cairo, 1952.

23. Ibn Manzour, Muhammad ibn Mukarram, Lisan al-Arab, vol. 1 & 2, Beirut, Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi, 1988.

24. Ibn Najim, Zayn al-Din bin Ibrahim, Al-Ashbah wa al-Nazair, research by Muhammad Muti’ al-Hafiz, Damascus, Dar al-Fikr, First Edition, 1983.

25. Johari, Ismail bin Hammad, Al-Sahah, vol. 1, 2 & 6, Beirut, Dar al-Ilm lil Mullahs (House of Knowledge for Mullahs), Fourth Edition, 1987.

26. Karimi Jahromi, Ali, Al-Dur al-Manzud fi Ahkam al-Hudud (statements of Ayatullah Golpayegani's lesson), vol. 1, Qom: Dar al-Quran al-Karim, 1992.

27. Khansari, Seyyed Ahmad, Jami’ al-Madarik, vol. 6, Tehran: Maktab al-Saduq, First Edition, 1974.

28. Khuei, Seyyed Abul Qasim, Mabani Takmilat al-Minhaj, vol. 1, Qom, Second Edition, 1976.

29. Letter of Mufid, Mufid University, No. 23, Autumn 2000.

30. Makarem Shirazi, Naser, Anwar al-Fiqahat kitab al-Hudud va al-Ta'zir, vol. 1, Qom, School of Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib (AS), First Edition, 1998.

31. Makki, Jamal al-Din (First martyr), Al-Qawaid val Fawaid, vol. 1, Qom: Maktab al-Mufid, Bita.

32. Montazeri, Hossein Ali, Islamic punishments and human rights, Qom: Arghavan Danesh, First Edition, 2008.

33. Moqaddas Ardebili, Ahmad bin Muhammad, Majma' al-Faedah val Burhan fi Sharh Irshad al-Azhan, vol. 1, Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute, 2000.

34. Mousavi Khomeini, Seyyed Ruhollah, Tahrir al-Wasilah, Najaf: Matba'a al-Adab, Second Edition, 1970.

35. Mousavi, Bojnordi, Seyyed Mohammad, Comparative jurisprudence (criminal section), vol. 1, Tehran: Mi’ad Publishing, First Edition, 1997.

36. Muhaqqiq Damad, Seyyed Mustafa, Rules of Criminal Jurisprudence, Tehran: Islamic Publishing Center, First Edition, 2010.

37. Najafi, Mohammad Hassan, Jawaher al-Kalam, vol. 41, Tehran: Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyah, Third Edition, 1989.

38. Naraqi, Ahmad bin Muhammad, Awaid al-Ayyam, vol. 2, Bina, Bija, 1903.

39. Ragheb Esfahani, Hossein, Mu'jam al-Mufradat al-Faz al-Quran, Al-Taqaddum al-'Arabi, 1972.

40. Sabzevari, Seyyed Abdul A’la, Muhazzab al-Ahkam, vol. 27, Office of Ayatullah Sabzevari, Fourth Edition, 1997.

41. Saduq, Muhammad bin Ali bin Babuyeh, Man la Yahduruhu al-Faqih, vol. 4, Beirut, Al-A'lami Institute, First Edition, 1986.

42. Sayyah, Ahmad, Great Novin Jame Dictionary, vol. 2, Tehran: Islam Publications, Tenth Edition, 1986.

43. Stephanie, Gaston et al., General criminal law, vol. 1, translated by Dr. Hassan Dadban, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University Press, First Edition, 1998.

44. Tabatabaei, Seyyed Ali, Riyaz al-Masail, vol. 2 & 13, Qom, Islamic Publishing Institute, First Edition, 2001.

45. Zuhhayli, Wahbah, Islamic jurisprudence and arguments, vol. 5, Damascus, Dar al-Fikr, Second Edition, 1989.

Downloads

Published

30.04.2020

How to Cite

Dayani Najaf Abadi, A., Tavakoli, A., ShekarchiZadeh, M., & Hadi Mahdavi, M. (2020). Rule of Darā’ and Doubt about Expediency in the Enforcement of Criminal Judgments. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 6023-6036. https://doi.org/10.61841/tchbh452